Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 3.668
IF3.668
IF 5-year value: 3.707
IF 5-year
3.707
CiteScore value: 6.3
CiteScore
6.3
SNIP value: 1.383
SNIP1.383
IPP value: 3.75
IPP3.75
SJR value: 1.525
SJR1.525
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 77
Scimago H
index
77
h5-index value: 49
h5-index49
Volume 9, issue 4
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 1785–1797, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1785-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 1785–1797, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1785-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 26 Apr 2016

Research article | 26 Apr 2016

Uncertainties in cloud phase and optical thickness retrievals from the Earth Polychromatic Imaging Camera (EPIC)

Kerry Meyer et al.

Data sets

MODIS Atmosphere L2 Cloud Product (06_L2) Steven Platnick, Michael King, Gala Wind, Steve Ackerman, Paul Menzel, and Rich Frey https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD06_L2.006

MODIS/Aqua Calibrated Radiances 5-Min L1B Swath 1km MODIS Characterization Support Team (MCST)/MODIS Adaptive Processing System (MODAPS) https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MYD021KM.006

MODIS/Aqua Cloud Mask and Spectral Test Results 5-Min L2 Swath 250 m and 1 km Ackerman, S. and Frey, R. https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MYD35_L2.006

MODIS/Aqua Clouds 5-Min L2 Swath 1 km and 5 km, Dataset Platnick, S., King, M. D., Wind, G., Ackerman, S., Menzel, W. P., and Frey, R. https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MYD06_L2.006

Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
This paper presents the expected uncertainties of a single-channel cloud opacity retrieval technique and a temperature-based cloud phase approach in support of the Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR) mission; DSCOVR cloud products will be derived from Earth Polychromatic Imaging Camera (EPIC) observations. Results show that, for ice clouds, retrieval errors are minimal (< 2 %), while for liquid clouds the error is limited to within 10 %, although for thin clouds the error can be higher.
This paper presents the expected uncertainties of a single-channel cloud opacity retrieval...
Citation