Articles | Volume 9, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2409-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2409-2016
Research article
 | 
01 Jun 2016
Research article |  | 01 Jun 2016

HOAPS and ERA-Interim precipitation over the sea: validation against shipboard in situ measurements

Karl Bumke, Gert König-Langlo, Julian Kinzel, and Marc Schröder

Viewed

Total article views: 3,304 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,922 873 509 3,304 83 82
  • HTML: 1,922
  • PDF: 873
  • XML: 509
  • Total: 3,304
  • BibTeX: 83
  • EndNote: 82
Views and downloads (calculated since 05 Feb 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 05 Feb 2016)

Cited

Latest update: 12 Jun 2024
Download
Short summary
Satellite-derived HOAPS and ERA-Interim reanalysis data were validated against shipboard precipitation measurements. Results show that HOAPS detects the frequency of precipitation well, while ERA-Interim strongly overestimates it, especially at low latitudes. However, HOAPS underestimates precipitation rates, while ERA-Interim's Atlantic-wide precipitation rate is close to measurements. ERA-Interim strongly overestimates it in the intertropical convergence zone and southern subtropics.