Articles | Volume 9, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2409-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2409-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
| 
01 Jun 2016
Research article |
| 01 Jun 2016
HOAPS and ERA-Interim precipitation over the sea: validation against shipboard in situ measurements
Karl Bumke
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany
Gert König-Langlo
Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, 27570 Bremerhaven, Germany
Julian Kinzel
GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany
Deutscher Wetterdienst, Satellite Based Climate Monitoring, 63067 Offenbach, Germany
Marc Schröder
Deutscher Wetterdienst, Satellite Based Climate Monitoring, 63067 Offenbach, Germany
Viewed
Total article views: 3,420 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 05 Feb 2016)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,005 | 898 | 517 | 3,420 | 95 | 90 |
- HTML: 2,005
- PDF: 898
- XML: 517
- Total: 3,420
- BibTeX: 95
- EndNote: 90
Total article views: 2,993 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Jun 2016)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,792 | 689 | 512 | 2,993 | 90 | 83 |
- HTML: 1,792
- PDF: 689
- XML: 512
- Total: 2,993
- BibTeX: 90
- EndNote: 83
Total article views: 427 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 05 Feb 2016)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 213 | 209 | 5 | 427 | 5 | 7 |
- HTML: 213
- PDF: 209
- XML: 5
- Total: 427
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 7
Cited
11 citations as recorded by crossref.
- How Accurately Can Warm Rain Realistically Be Retrieved with Satellite Sensors? Part I: DSD Uncertainties R. Schulte et al. 10.1175/JAMC-D-21-0158.1
- How accurate are satellite estimates of precipitation over the north Indian Ocean? S. Prakash et al. 10.1007/s00704-017-2287-2
- Validation of ERA-Interim Precipitation Estimates over the Baltic Sea K. Bumke 10.3390/atmos7060082
- Validation of HOAPS Rain Retrievals against OceanRAIN In-Situ Measurements over the Atlantic Ocean K. Bumke et al. 10.3390/atmos10010015
- Simulation of Ship-Track versus Satellite-Sensor Differences in Oceanic Precipitation Using an Island-Based Radar J. Burdanowitz et al. 10.3390/rs9060593
- OceanRAIN, a new in-situ shipboard global ocean surface-reference dataset of all water cycle components C. Klepp et al. 10.1038/sdata.2018.122
- Evaluation of six precipitation products in the Mekong River Basin W. Tian et al. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105539
- Evaluation of Eight Global Precipitation Datasets in Hydrological Modeling Y. Xiang et al. 10.3390/rs13142831
- Inter-Comparison of Multiple Gridded Precipitation Datasets over Different Climates at Global Scale W. Qi et al. 10.3390/w16111553
- Assessment of remotely sensed precipitation products for climatic and hydrological studies in arid to semi-arid data-scarce region, central-western Morocco I. Bouizrou et al. 10.1016/j.rsase.2023.100976
- Global-scale evaluation of 22 precipitation datasets using gauge observations and hydrological modeling H. Beck et al. 10.5194/hess-21-6201-2017
11 citations as recorded by crossref.
- How Accurately Can Warm Rain Realistically Be Retrieved with Satellite Sensors? Part I: DSD Uncertainties R. Schulte et al. 10.1175/JAMC-D-21-0158.1
- How accurate are satellite estimates of precipitation over the north Indian Ocean? S. Prakash et al. 10.1007/s00704-017-2287-2
- Validation of ERA-Interim Precipitation Estimates over the Baltic Sea K. Bumke 10.3390/atmos7060082
- Validation of HOAPS Rain Retrievals against OceanRAIN In-Situ Measurements over the Atlantic Ocean K. Bumke et al. 10.3390/atmos10010015
- Simulation of Ship-Track versus Satellite-Sensor Differences in Oceanic Precipitation Using an Island-Based Radar J. Burdanowitz et al. 10.3390/rs9060593
- OceanRAIN, a new in-situ shipboard global ocean surface-reference dataset of all water cycle components C. Klepp et al. 10.1038/sdata.2018.122
- Evaluation of six precipitation products in the Mekong River Basin W. Tian et al. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105539
- Evaluation of Eight Global Precipitation Datasets in Hydrological Modeling Y. Xiang et al. 10.3390/rs13142831
- Inter-Comparison of Multiple Gridded Precipitation Datasets over Different Climates at Global Scale W. Qi et al. 10.3390/w16111553
- Assessment of remotely sensed precipitation products for climatic and hydrological studies in arid to semi-arid data-scarce region, central-western Morocco I. Bouizrou et al. 10.1016/j.rsase.2023.100976
- Global-scale evaluation of 22 precipitation datasets using gauge observations and hydrological modeling H. Beck et al. 10.5194/hess-21-6201-2017
Latest update: 14 Dec 2024
Short summary
Satellite-derived HOAPS and ERA-Interim reanalysis data were validated against shipboard precipitation measurements. Results show that HOAPS detects the frequency of precipitation well, while ERA-Interim strongly overestimates it, especially at low latitudes. However, HOAPS underestimates precipitation rates, while ERA-Interim's Atlantic-wide precipitation rate is close to measurements. ERA-Interim strongly overestimates it in the intertropical convergence zone and southern subtropics.
Satellite-derived HOAPS and ERA-Interim reanalysis data were validated against shipboard...
