Articles | Volume 9, issue 7
Research article
28 Jul 2016
Research article |  | 28 Jul 2016

MIPAS IMK/IAA CFC-11 (CCl3F) and CFC-12 (CCl2F2) measurements: accuracy, precision and long-term stability

E. Eckert, A. Laeng, S. Lossow, S. Kellmann, G. Stiller, T. von Clarmann, N. Glatthor, M. Höpfner, M. Kiefer, H. Oelhaf, J. Orphal, B. Funke, U. Grabowski, F. Haenel, A. Linden, G. Wetzel, W. Woiwode, P. F. Bernath, C. Boone, G. S. Dutton, J. W. Elkins, A. Engel, J. C. Gille, F. Kolonjari, T. Sugita, G. C. Toon, and K. A. Walker


Total article views: 3,953 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,271 1,364 318 3,953 135 127
  • HTML: 2,271
  • PDF: 1,364
  • XML: 318
  • Total: 3,953
  • BibTeX: 135
  • EndNote: 127
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Jul 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Jul 2015)


Latest update: 02 Mar 2024
Short summary
We investigate the accuracy, precision and long-term stability of the MIPAS Envisat IMK/IAA CFC-11 (CCl3F) and CFC-12 (CCl2F2) products. For comparisons we use several data products from satellite, airplane and balloon-borne instruments as well as ground-based data. MIPAS Envisat CFC-11 has a slight high bias at the lower end of the profile. CFC-12 agrees well with other data products. The temporal stability is good up to ~ 30 km, but still leaves room for improvement.