Articles | Volume 9, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-3527-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-3527-2016
Research article
 | 
03 Aug 2016
Research article |  | 03 Aug 2016

Assessment of errors and biases in retrievals of XCO2, XCH4, XCO, and XN2O from a 0.5 cm–1 resolution solar-viewing spectrometer

Jacob K. Hedelius, Camille Viatte, Debra Wunch, Coleen M. Roehl, Geoffrey C. Toon, Jia Chen, Taylor Jones, Steven C. Wofsy, Jonathan E. Franklin, Harrison Parker, Manvendra K. Dubey, and Paul O. Wennberg

Viewed

Total article views: 3,889 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,214 1,562 113 3,889 132 132
  • HTML: 2,214
  • PDF: 1,562
  • XML: 113
  • Total: 3,889
  • BibTeX: 132
  • EndNote: 132
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Mar 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Mar 2016)

Cited

Saved (preprint)

Latest update: 22 Feb 2024
Download
Short summary
Portable FTS instruments with lower resolution are being used to measure gases (including CO2, CH4, CO, and N2O) in the atmosphere. We compared measurements from four of these instruments for a few weeks, and with one for nearly a year to a higher resolution TCCON standard. We also performed tests to assess performance under different atmospheric and instrumental conditions. We noted consistent offsets in the short-term (~1 month); more research is still needed to assess precision longer term.