Articles | Volume 9, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5281-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5281-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Community Air Sensor Network (CAIRSENSE) project: evaluation of low-cost sensor performance in a suburban environment in the southeastern United States
Wan Jiao
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Research and
Development, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA
Gayle Hagler
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Research and
Development, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA
Ronald Williams
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Research and
Development, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA
Robert Sharpe
ARCADIS US, Inc., Durham, NC 27713, USA
Ryan Brown
US EPA, Region 4, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA
Daniel Garver
US EPA, Region 4, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA
Robert Judge
US EPA, Region 1, Boston, MA 02109, USA
Motria Caudill
US EPA, Region 5, Chicago, IL 60604, USA
Joshua Rickard
US EPA, Region 8, Denver, CO 80202, USA
Michael Davis
US EPA, Region 7, Lenexa, KS 66219, USA
Lewis Weinstock
US EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle
Park, NC 27711, USA
Susan Zimmer-Dauphinee
Georgia Environmental Protection Division, Atlanta, GA 30354, USA
Ken Buckley
Georgia Environmental Protection Division, Atlanta, GA 30354, USA
Viewed
Total article views: 20,447 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 21 Jun 2016)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12,148 | 7,788 | 511 | 20,447 | 947 | 187 | 257 |
- HTML: 12,148
- PDF: 7,788
- XML: 511
- Total: 20,447
- Supplement: 947
- BibTeX: 187
- EndNote: 257
Total article views: 13,137 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Nov 2016)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5,848 | 6,787 | 502 | 13,137 | 704 | 180 | 252 |
- HTML: 5,848
- PDF: 6,787
- XML: 502
- Total: 13,137
- Supplement: 704
- BibTeX: 180
- EndNote: 252
Total article views: 7,310 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 21 Jun 2016)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6,300 | 1,001 | 9 | 7,310 | 243 | 7 | 5 |
- HTML: 6,300
- PDF: 1,001
- XML: 9
- Total: 7,310
- Supplement: 243
- BibTeX: 7
- EndNote: 5
Cited
278 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Application of Machine Learning for the in-Field Correction of a PM2.5 Low-Cost Sensor Network W. Wang et al. 10.3390/s20175002
- Errors in ambient gas concentration measurement caused by acoustic response of electrochemical gas sensors A. Farquhar et al. 10.1016/j.sna.2023.114254
- On-field test and data calibration of a low-cost sensor for fine particles exposure assessment Y. Jiang et al. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.111958
- Performance evaluation of light weight gas sensor system suitable for airborne applications against co-location gas analysers over Delhi A. Ahlawat et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134016
- Domain Adaptation-Based Deep Calibration of Low-Cost PM₂.₅ Sensors S. Jha et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3118454
- Optimising Citizen-Driven Air Quality Monitoring Networks for Cities S. Gupta et al. 10.3390/ijgi7120468
- Evaluating uncertainty in sensor networks for urban air pollution insights D. Peters et al. 10.5194/amt-15-321-2022
- Automated data scanning for dense networks of low-cost air quality instruments: Detection and differentiation of instrumental error and local to regional scale environmental abnormalities M. Alavi-Shoshtari et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.12.002
- Assessing the accuracy of commercially available gas sensors for the measurement of ambient ozone and nitrogen dioxide K. Isiugo et al. 10.1080/15459624.2018.1513135
- Anomaly Detection and Repairing for Improving Air Quality Monitoring F. Rollo et al. 10.3390/s23020640
- Spatially dense air pollutant sampling: Implications of spatial variability on the representativeness of stationary air pollutant monitors H. Li et al. 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100012
- Temporal changes in field calibration relationships for Aeroqual S500 O3 and NO2 sensor-based monitors N. Masey et al. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.07.087
- Modeling fine-grained spatio-temporal pollution maps with low-cost sensors S. Iyer et al. 10.1038/s41612-022-00293-z
- Secondhand smoke exposure in public and private high-rise multiunit housing serving low-income residents in New York City prior to federal smoking ban in public housing, 2018 E. Anastasiou et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135322
- Interpreting Mobile and Handheld Air Sensor Readings in Relation to Air Quality Standards and Health Effect Reference Values: Tackling the Challenges G. Woodall et al. 10.3390/atmos8100182
- Added Value of Vaisala AQT530 Sensors as a Part of a Sensor Network for Comprehensive Air Quality Monitoring T. Petäjä et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2021.719567
- Low- and Medium-Cost Sensors for Tropospheric Ozone Monitoring—Results of an Evaluation Study in Wrocław, Poland M. Badura et al. 10.3390/atmos13040542
- Developing a Modular Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Platform for Air Pollution Profiling Q. Gu et al. 10.3390/s18124363
- Evaluation of high-resolution GRAMM–GRAL (v15.12/v14.8) NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> simulations over the city of Zürich, Switzerland A. Berchet et al. 10.5194/gmd-10-3441-2017
- Pilot study of the vertical variations in outdoor pollutant concentrations and environmental conditions along the height of a tall building P. Azimi et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.04.031
- Outlier detection and gap filling methodologies for low-cost air quality measurements T. Ottosen & P. Kumar 10.1039/C8EM00593A
- Impacts of pollution heterogeneity on population exposure in dense urban areas using ultra-fine resolution air quality data W. Che et al. 10.1016/j.jes.2022.02.041
- Reversible Electrochemical Gelation of Metal Chalcogenide Quantum Dots C. Hewa-Rahinduwage et al. 10.1021/jacs.0c03156
- Development and evaluation of a palm-sized optical PM2.5sensor T. Nakayama et al. 10.1080/02786826.2017.1375078
- End-user perspective of low-cost sensors for outdoor air pollution monitoring A. Rai et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.266
- Laboratory evaluation of particle-size selectivity of optical low-cost particulate matter sensors J. Kuula et al. 10.5194/amt-13-2413-2020
- A systematic investigation on the effects of temperature and relative humidity on the performance of eight low-cost particle sensors and devices Y. Zou et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2020.105715
- Evaluation of low-cost gas sensors to quantify intra-urban variability of atmospheric pollutants A. Baruah et al. 10.1039/D2EA00165A
- Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors: One-Year Field Comparative Measurement of Different Gas Sensors and Particle Counters with Reference Monitors at Tušimice Observatory P. Bauerová et al. 10.3390/atmos11050492
- Field Evaluation of Low-Cost PM Sensors (Purple Air PA-II) Under Variable Urban Air Quality Conditions, in Greece I. Stavroulas et al. 10.3390/atmos11090926
- Advances in Application of Air Quality Sensors in Environmental Monitoring 英. 宋 10.12677/AEP.2019.93037
- Spatial modelling of particulate matter air pollution sensor measurements collected by community scientists while cycling, land use regression with spatial cross-validation, and applications of machine learning for data correction M. Adams et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117479
- Significance of sources and size distribution on calibration of low-cost particle sensors: Evidence from a field sampling campaign V. Malyan et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2022.106114
- Spatial and temporal variability of urban cyclists’ exposure to PM2.5 in Medellín, Colombia J. Martínez et al. 10.1016/j.apr.2023.101946
- Insights about the Sources of PM2.5 in an Urban Area from Measurements of a Low-Cost Sensor Network G. Kosmopoulos et al. 10.3390/atmos13030440
- The Imperial County Community Air Monitoring Network: A Model for Community-based Environmental Monitoring for Public Health Action P. English et al. 10.1289/EHP1772
- Using a network of lower-cost monitors to identify the influence of modifiable factors driving spatial patterns in fine particulate matter concentrations in an urban environment S. Rose Eilenberg et al. 10.1038/s41370-020-0255-x
- In Situ Calibration Algorithms for Environmental Sensor Networks: A Review F. Delaine et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2019.2910317
- Tropical Air Chemistry in Lagos, Nigeria A. Odu-Onikosi et al. 10.3390/atmos13071059
- From low-cost sensors to high-quality data: A summary of challenges and best practices for effectively calibrating low-cost particulate matter mass sensors M. Giordano et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105833
- Evaluation of low-cost sensors for quantitative personal exposure monitoring S. Mahajan & P. Kumar 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102076
- City Scale Particulate Matter Monitoring Using LoRaWAN Based Air Quality IoT Devices S. Johnston et al. 10.3390/s19010209
- Development of Low-Cost Air Quality Stations for Next Generation Monitoring Networks: Calibration and Validation of PM2.5 and PM10 Sensors A. Cavaliere et al. 10.3390/s18092843
- Long-term sensor measurements of lung deposited surface area of particulate matter emitted from local vehicular and residential wood combustion sources J. Kuula et al. 10.1080/02786826.2019.1668909
- Community-based participatory research for the study of air pollution: a review of motivations, approaches, and outcomes A. Commodore et al. 10.1007/s10661-017-6063-7
- Using Low-Cost Air Quality Sensor Networks to Improve the Spatial and Temporal Resolution of Concentration Maps F. Ahangar et al. 10.3390/ijerph16071252
- Contribution of low-cost sensor measurements to the prediction of PM2.5 levels: A case study in Imperial County, California, USA J. Bi et al. 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108810
- Environment-Adaptive Calibration System for Outdoor Low-Cost Electrochemical Gas Sensors B. Tian et al. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2916826
- Evaluation of the Performance of Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors at a High Mountain Station with Complex Meteorological Conditions H. Li et al. 10.3390/atmos11020212
- On Memory-Based Precise Calibration of Cost-Efficient NO2 Sensor Using Artificial Intelligence and Global Response Correction S. Koziel et al. 10.1016/j.knosys.2024.111564
- Challenges and Opportunities in Calibrating Low-Cost Environmental Sensors N. Nalakurthi et al. 10.3390/s24113650
- In-car and Near-road Exposure to PM2.5 and BC C. Ma & G. Kang 10.5572/ajae.2020.14.2.146
- Design and Evaluation of a Reliable Low-Cost Atmospheric Pollution Station in Urban Environment G. Astudillo et al. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2980736
- Using a distributed air sensor network to investigate the spatiotemporal patterns of PM2.5 concentrations R. Cao et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114549
- Understanding social and behavioral drivers and impacts of air quality sensor use B. Hubbell et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.275
- Field calibration of electrochemical NO<sub>2</sub> sensors in a citizen science context B. Mijling et al. 10.5194/amt-11-1297-2018
- Integrating Fixed Monitoring Systems with Low-Cost Sensors to Create High-Resolution Air Quality Maps for the Northern China Plain Region C. Chao et al. 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00174
- Response of low-cost sensors to high PM 2.5 concentrations during bushfire and haze events X. Liu et al. 10.1080/02786826.2024.2368733
- Low Cost Sensor With IoT LoRaWAN Connectivity and Machine Learning-Based Calibration for Air Pollution Monitoring S. Ali et al. 10.1109/TIM.2020.3034109
- Machine learning calibration of low-cost NO<sub>2</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> sensors: non-linear algorithms and their impact on site transferability P. Nowack et al. 10.5194/amt-14-5637-2021
- Assessment of aerosol persistence in ICUs via low-cost sensor network and zonal models K. Glenn et al. 10.1038/s41598-023-30778-7
- Humidity, density, and inlet aspiration efficiency correction improve accuracy of a low-cost sensor during field calibration at a suburban site in the North-Western Indo-Gangetic plain (NW-IGP) H. Pawar & B. Sinha 10.1080/02786826.2020.1719971
- Performance of a Low-Cost Sensor Community Air Monitoring Network in Imperial County, CA P. English et al. 10.3390/s20113031
- Leveraging low-cost sensors to predict nitrogen dioxide for epidemiologic exposure assessment C. Zuidema et al. 10.1038/s41370-024-00667-w
- A citizen science approach for enhancing public understanding of air pollution S. Mahajan et al. 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101800
- Response of consumer and research grade indoor air quality monitors to residential sources of fine particles B. Singer & W. Delp 10.1111/ina.12463
- Electrochemical Gas Sensors as Microphones D. Williams et al. 10.2139/ssrn.4094644
- End-User Feedback on a Low-Cost Portable Air Quality Sensor System—Are We There Yet? J. Robinson et al. 10.3390/s18113768
- Concentration-Temporal Multilevel Calibration of Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensors R. Day et al. 10.3390/su141610015
- Evaluation of a new low-cost particle sensor as an internet-of-things device for outdoor air quality monitoring F. Roberts et al. 10.1080/10962247.2022.2093293
- Examining the functional range of commercially available low‐cost airborne particle sensors and consequences for monitoring of indoor air quality in residences Y. Zou et al. 10.1111/ina.12621
- Investigating measurement variation of modified low-cost particle sensors S. Collingwood et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2019.04.017
- Gaussian process regression model for dynamically calibrating and surveilling a wireless low-cost particulate matter sensor network in Delhi T. Zheng et al. 10.5194/amt-12-5161-2019
- Air Quality Sensors and Data Adjustment Algorithms: When Is It No Longer a Measurement? G. Hagler et al. 10.1021/acs.est.8b01826
- A low-cost monitor for measurement of fine particulate matter and aerosol optical depth – Part 2: Citizen-science pilot campaign in northern Colorado B. Ford et al. 10.5194/amt-12-6385-2019
- Machine-learning-based precise cost-efficient NO2 sensor calibration by means of time series matching and global data pre-processing S. Koziel et al. 10.1016/j.jestch.2024.101729
- Air Quality in Puerto Rico in the Aftermath of Hurricane Maria: A Case Study on the Use of Lower Cost Air Quality Monitors R. Subramanian et al. 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00079
- Air pollution monitoring network using low-cost sensors, a case study in Hanoi, Vietnam T. Nguyen et al. 10.1088/1755-1315/266/1/012017
- UNI-CAL: A Universal AI-Driven Model for Air Pollutant Sensor Calibration With Domain-Specific Knowledge Inputs Y. Han et al. 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3410171
- Node-to-node field calibration of wireless distributed air pollution sensor network F. Kizel et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.09.042
- Particulate matters: student-led air quality research in the third-year environmental chemistry classroom and the field S. Gao et al. 10.1007/s00216-018-0972-3
- The Kansas City Transportation and Local-Scale Air Quality Study (KC-TRAQS): Integration of Low-Cost Sensors and Reference Grade Monitoring in a Complex Metropolitan Area. Part 1: Overview of the Project S. Kimbrough et al. 10.3390/chemosensors7020026
- Schoolchildren’s exposure to PM2.5: a student club–based air quality monitoring campaign using low-cost sensors L. Chen et al. 10.1007/s11869-020-00815-9
- Estimating concentrations for particle and gases in a mechanically ventilated building in Hong Kong: multivariate method and machine learning W. Che et al. 10.1007/s11869-021-01093-9
- Amperometric Gas Sensors as a Low Cost Emerging Technology Platform for Air Quality Monitoring Applications: A Review R. Baron & J. Saffell 10.1021/acssensors.7b00620
- Using crowd-sourced low-cost sensors in a land use regression of PM2.5 in 6 US cities T. Lu et al. 10.1007/s11869-022-01162-7
- Errors in Ambient Gas Concentration Measurement Caused by Acoustic Response of Electrochemical Gas Sensors D. Williams et al. 10.2139/ssrn.4159819
- Response Characterization of an Inexpensive Aerosol Sensor J. Kuula et al. 10.3390/s17122915
- Field evaluation of low-cost particulate matter sensors in high- and low-concentration environments T. Zheng et al. 10.5194/amt-11-4823-2018
- On the Security and Data Integrity of Low-Cost Sensor Networks for Air Quality Monitoring L. Luo et al. 10.3390/s18124451
- Effects of personal air pollution exposure on asthma symptoms, lung function and airway inflammation L. Chambers et al. 10.1111/cea.13130
- Low-Power Wide-Area technologies as building block for smart sensors in air quality measurements M. Knoll et al. 10.1007/s00502-018-0639-y
- The performance assessment of low-cost air pollution sensor in city and the prospect of the autonomous vehicle for air pollution reduction L. Phuong Linh et al. 10.1088/1757-899X/819/1/012018
- Evaluation of Cairpol and Aeroqual Air Sensors in Biomass Burning Plumes A. Whitehill et al. 10.3390/atmos13060877
- CLEAN - Collaborative low-cost environmental and air-quality network F. Campo et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105664
- Nitrogen Dioxide, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Transportation in Urban Areas: Lessons From the Covid-19 Pandemic C. Restrepo 10.3389/fenvs.2021.689985
- A Low-Cost Optoacoustic Sensor for Environmental Monitoring A. Stylogiannis et al. 10.3390/s21041379
- Air Quality Sensor Networks for Evidence-Based Policy Making: Best Practices for Actionable Insights J. Hofman et al. 10.3390/atmos13060944
- High-performance machine-learning-based calibration of low-cost nitrogen dioxide sensor using environmental parameter differentials and global data scaling S. Koziel et al. 10.1038/s41598-024-77214-y
- A protocol for measuring the impact of a smoke-free housing policy on indoor tobacco smoke exposure R. Cardozo et al. 10.1186/s12889-019-7043-3
- Investigation of LASSO Regression Method as a Correction Measurements’ Factor for Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors I. Christakis et al. 10.3390/signals5010004
- Performance evaluation of MeteoTracker mobile sensor for outdoor applications F. Barbano et al. 10.5194/amt-17-3255-2024
- Testing the performance of field calibration techniques for low-cost gas sensors in new deployment locations: across a county line and across Colorado J. Casey & M. Hannigan 10.5194/amt-11-6351-2018
- Self-Portraits of Personal Exposure to Air Pollution: on where and when People Are Exposed, and on why it Is Difficult to Avoid N. da Schio 10.1007/s10745-020-00176-y
- Low-Cost Air Quality Monitoring Tools: From Research to Practice (A Workshop Summary) A. Clements et al. 10.3390/s17112478
- Design Considerations for a Distributed Low-Cost Air Quality Sensing System for Urban Environments in Low-Resource Settings E. Bainomugisha et al. 10.3390/atmos14020354
- Understanding the effect of temperature and relative humidity on sensor sensitivities in field environments and improving the calibration models of multiple electrochemical carbon monoxide (CO) sensors in a tropical environment R. Ariyaratne et al. 10.1016/j.snb.2023.133935
- The BErkeley Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> Observation Network: field calibration and evaluation of low-cost air quality sensors J. Kim et al. 10.5194/amt-11-1937-2018
- Field comparison of electrochemical gas sensor data correction algorithms for ambient air measurements Y. Liang et al. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128897
- Evaluating the Performance of Using Low-Cost Sensors to Calibrate for Cross-Sensitivities in a Multipollutant Network M. Levy Zamora et al. 10.1021/acsestengg.1c00367
- Precision and Accuracy of a Direct-Reading Miniaturized Monitor in PM2.5 Exposure Assessment F. Borghi et al. 10.3390/s18093089
- Ambient Air Quality Measurement with Low-Cost Optical and Electrochemical Sensors: An Evaluation of Continuous Year-Long Operation J. Bílek et al. 10.3390/environments8110114
- Association between microenvironment air quality and cardiovascular health outcomes Y. Tan et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137027
- Evaluation methods for low-cost particulate matter sensors J. Bean 10.5194/amt-14-7369-2021
- Characterising a mobile reference station (MoRS) to quantify personal exposure to air quality M. Hedges et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120160
- Atomically dispersed Pb ionic sites in PbCdSe quantum dot gels enhance room-temperature NO2 sensing X. Geng et al. 10.1038/s41467-021-25192-4
- Association between particulate matter and respiratory symptoms in students in the municipality of Guachetá, Colombia B. Saavedra Bayona et al. 10.17533/udea.redin.20210954
- Evaluation of two collocated federal equivalent method PM2.5 instruments over a wide range of concentrations in Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina G. Hagler et al. 10.1016/j.apr.2022.101374
- Fine particle mass monitoring with low-cost sensors: Corrections and long-term performance evaluation C. Malings et al. 10.1080/02786826.2019.1623863
- Network of low-cost air quality sensors for monitoring indoor, outdoor, and personal PM2.5 exposure in Seattle during the 2020 wildfire season J. He et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119244
- Identification of indoor air quality events using a K-means clustering analysis of gas sensors data A. Caron et al. 10.1016/j.snb.2019.126709
- Air Quality Enhancement Districts: democratizing data to improve respiratory health K. Stevens et al. 10.1007/s13412-021-00670-9
- Effects of Road Traffic on the Accuracy and Bias of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensor Measurements in Houston, Texas T. Oluwadairo et al. 10.3390/ijerph19031086
- A Survey on Sensor Calibration in Air Pollution Monitoring Deployments B. Maag et al. 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2853660
- Field evaluation of low-cost electrochemical air quality gas sensors under extreme temperature and relative humidity conditions R. Papaconstantinou et al. 10.5194/amt-16-3313-2023
- Effects of aerosol particle size on the measurement of airborne PM2.5 with a low-cost particulate matter sensor (LCPMS) in a laboratory chamber T. Oluwadairo et al. 10.1007/s10661-021-09715-6
- Minimized Training of Machine Learning-Based Calibration Methods for Low-Cost O3 Sensors S. Tondini et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2023.3339202
- Monitoring of greenhouse gases and pollutants across an urban area using a light-rail public transit platform L. Mitchell et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.05.044
- A Variational Bayesian Blind Calibration Approach for Air Quality Sensor Deployments G. Li et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2022.3212009
- Development of Air Quality Boxes Based on Low-Cost Sensor Technology for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring P. Gäbel et al. 10.3390/s22103830
- Review of low-cost sensors for indoor air quality: Features and applications M. Ródenas García et al. 10.1080/05704928.2022.2085734
- Probability-guaranteed distributed set-membership filtering over sensor networks: A stochastic communication protocol case H. Yu et al. 10.1016/j.sysconle.2024.105800
- Performance evaluation of twelve low-cost PM2.5 sensors at an ambient air monitoring site B. Feenstra et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116946
- Low-Cost Outdoor Air Quality Monitoring and Sensor Calibration F. Concas et al. 10.1145/3446005
- Leveraging Citizen Science and Low-Cost Sensors to Characterize Air Pollution Exposure of Disadvantaged Communities in Southern California T. Lu et al. 10.3390/ijerph19148777
- Youth Engaged Participatory Air Monitoring: A ‘Day in the Life’ in Urban Environmental Justice Communities J. Johnston et al. 10.3390/ijerph17010093
- A compact, modular and low-cost Internet of Things (IoT) platform for air quality monitoring in urban areas C. Spandonidis et al. 10.1088/1742-6596/1710/1/012004
- Low-cost sensors as an alternative for long-term air quality monitoring X. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109438
- Exploration of intra-city and inter-city PM2.5 regional calibration models to improve low-cost sensor performance S. Jain & N. Zimmerman 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2024.106335
- An overview of outdoor low-cost gas-phase air quality sensor deployments: current efforts, trends, and limitations K. Okorn & L. Iraci 10.5194/amt-17-6425-2024
- Calibrating low-cost sensors for ambient air monitoring: Techniques, trends, and challenges L. Liang 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111163
- Gaps and future directions in research on health effects of air pollution R. Vilcassim & G. Thurston 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104668
- SCAN B. Maag et al. 10.1145/3090084
- Estimating hourly PM2.5 concentrations at the neighborhood scale using a low-cost air sensor network: A Los Angeles case study Y. Lu et al. 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110653
- A Community-Based Sensor Network for Monitoring the Air Quality in Urban Romania L. Velea et al. 10.3390/atmos14050840
- Mobile phones as monitors of personal exposure to air pollution: Is this the future? M. Nyarku et al. 10.1371/journal.pone.0193150
- Measuring Spatial and Temporal PM2.5 Variations in Sacramento, California, Communities Using a Network of Low-Cost Sensors A. Mukherjee et al. 10.3390/s19214701
- Estimating Mass Concentration Using a Low-cost Portable Particle Counter Based on Full-year Observations: Issues to Obtain Reliable Atmospheric PM2.5 Data S. Ueda et al. 10.5572/ajae.2020.14.2.155
- Enhancing the reliability of particulate matter sensing by multivariate Tobit model using weather and air quality data W. Won et al. 10.1038/s41598-023-40468-z
- Design and integration of air pollutants monitoring system for emergency management in construction site based on BIM and edge computing Z. Xu et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108725
- Use of electrochemical sensors for measurement of air pollution: correcting interference response and validating measurements E. Cross et al. 10.5194/amt-10-3575-2017
- A New Black Carbon Sensor for Dense Air Quality Monitoring Networks J. Caubel et al. 10.3390/s18030738
- Development and field validation of a community-engaged particulate matter air quality monitoring network in Imperial, California, USA G. Carvlin et al. 10.1080/10962247.2017.1369471
- Low-Cost CO Sensor Calibration Using One Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network S. Ali et al. 10.3390/s23020854
- Identification of the Safe Variation Limits for the Optimization of the Measurements in Low-Cost Electrochemical Air Quality Sensors I. Christakis et al. 10.3390/electrochem5010001
- Low‐cost air quality monitoring networks for long‐term field campaigns: A review F. Carotenuto et al. 10.1002/met.2161
- Long-term field comparison of multiple low-cost particulate matter sensors in an outdoor urban environment F. Bulot et al. 10.1038/s41598-019-43716-3
- Deployment of networked low-cost sensors and comparison to real-time stationary monitors in New Delhi J. Prakash et al. 10.1080/10962247.2021.1890276
- A citizen science approach for air quality monitoring in a Kenyan informal development T. Manshur et al. 10.1016/j.cacint.2023.100105
- Impact Analysis of Temperature and Humidity Conditions on Electrochemical Sensor Response in Ambient Air Quality Monitoring P. Wei et al. 10.3390/s18020059
- Influence of particle properties and environmental factors on the performance of typical particle monitors and low-cost particle sensors in the market of China D. Wu et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118825
- MAIC: Metalearning-Based Adaptive In-Field Calibration for IoT Air Quality Monitoring System N. Liu et al. 10.1109/JIOT.2022.3150849
- Quantifying Neighborhood-Scale Spatial Variations of Ozone at Open Space and Urban Sites in Boulder, Colorado Using Low-Cost Sensor Technology L. Cheadle et al. 10.3390/s17092072
- Citizen as Sensors' Commitment in Urban Public Action G. l'Her et al. 10.4018/IJEPR.2019100103
- Wildfire Smoke Adjustment Factors for Low-Cost and Professional PM2.5 Monitors with Optical Sensors W. Delp & B. Singer 10.3390/s20133683
- Air pollution measurement errors: is your data fit for purpose? S. Diez et al. 10.5194/amt-15-4091-2022
- Application of Gaussian Mixture Regression for the Correction of Low Cost PM2.5 Monitoring Data in Accra, Ghana C. McFarlane et al. 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00217
- Laboratory Evaluations of Correction Equations with Multiple Choices for Seed Low-Cost Particle Sensing Devices in Sensor Networks W. Wang et al. 10.3390/s20133661
- Field and laboratory performance evaluations of 28 gas-phase air quality sensors by the AQ-SPEC program A. Collier-Oxandale et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117092
- Technical note: Understanding the effect of COVID-19 on particle pollution using a low-cost sensor network E. Chadwick et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105766
- Data Quality in IoT-Based Air Quality Monitoring Systems: a Systematic Mapping Study J. Buelvas et al. 10.1007/s11270-023-06127-9
- Intra-urban spatial variability of surface ozone in Riverside, CA: viability and validation of low-cost sensors K. Sadighi et al. 10.5194/amt-11-1777-2018
- Robust statistical calibration and characterization of portable low-cost air quality monitoring sensors to quantify real-time O<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations in diverse environments R. Sahu et al. 10.5194/amt-14-37-2021
- Evaluation of calibration performance of a low-cost particulate matter sensor using collocated and distant NO2 K. Ko et al. 10.5194/amt-17-3303-2024
- Review of the Performance of Low-Cost Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring F. Karagulian et al. 10.3390/atmos10090506
- Methodology for Addressing Infectious Aerosol Persistence in Real-Time Using Sensor Network S. Makhsous et al. 10.3390/s21113928
- Low-cost urban carbon monitoring network and implications for china: a comprehensive review H. Jiang et al. 10.1007/s11356-023-29836-4
- Features and Practicability of the Next-Generation Sensors and Monitors for Exposure Assessment to Airborne Pollutants: A Systematic Review G. Fanti et al. 10.3390/s21134513
- Estimating personal exposures from a multi-hazard sensor network C. Zuidema et al. 10.1038/s41370-019-0146-1
- Examining spatiotemporal variability of urban particulate matter and application of high-time resolution data from a network of low-cost air pollution sensors S. Feinberg et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.026
- Challenges and opportunities of low-cost sensors in capturing the impacts of construction activities on neighborhood air quality W. Jaafar et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111363
- Data Evaluation of a Low-Cost Sensor Network for Atmospheric Particulate Matter Monitoring in 15 Municipalities in Serbia D. Stojanović et al. 10.3390/s24134052
- Development and application of a United States-wide correction for PM<sub>2.5</sub> data collected with the PurpleAir sensor K. Barkjohn et al. 10.5194/amt-14-4617-2021
- Bio(sensors) based on molecularly imprinted polymers and silica materials used for food safety and biomedical analysis: Recent trends and future prospects X. Yan et al. 10.1016/j.talanta.2024.126292
- Performance evaluation of ozone and particulate matter sensors H. DeWitt et al. 10.1080/10962247.2020.1713921
- Effect of Three-Dimensional-Printed Thermoplastics Used in Sensor Housings on Common Atmospheric Trace Gasses T. Mangin et al. 10.3390/s24082610
- Distant calibration of low-cost PM and NO2 sensors; evidence from multiple sensor testbeds J. Hofman et al. 10.1016/j.apr.2021.101246
- Emulation of a Chemical Transport Model to Assess Air Quality under Future Emission Scenarios for the Southwest of Western Australia S. Vander Hoorn et al. 10.3390/atmos13122009
- Effect of environmental conditions on the performance of a low-cost atmospheric particulate matter sensor B. Macías-Hernández et al. 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101753
- Calibration and Inter-Unit Consistency Assessment of an Electrochemical Sensor System Using Machine Learning I. Apostolopoulos et al. 10.3390/s24134110
- A methodology for the characterization of portable sensors for air quality measure with the goal of deployment in citizen science B. Languille et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134698
- Community-Based Measurements Reveal Unseen Differences during Air Pollution Episodes K. Kelly et al. 10.1021/acs.est.0c02341
- Particulate Matter Emissions at Different Microenvironments Using Low-Cost Sensors in Megacity Dhaka, Bangladesh M. Nayeem et al. 10.3390/atmos15080897
- Dissecting PM sensor capabilities: A combined experimental and theoretical study on particle sizing and physicochemical properties X. Qin et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124354
- Cost-Efficient measurement platform and machine-learning-based sensor calibration for precise NO2 pollution monitoring A. Pietrenko-Dabrowska et al. 10.1016/j.measurement.2024.115168
- Predicting airborne pollutant concentrations and events in a commercial building using low-cost pollutant sensors and machine learning: A case study A. Mohammadshirazi et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108833
- A Review of Literature on the Usage of Low-Cost Sensors to Measure Particulate Matter A. Raysoni et al. 10.3390/earth4010009
- Spatial-Temporal Analysis of PM2.5 and NO2 Concentrations Collected Using Low-Cost Sensors in Peñuelas, Puerto Rico S. Reece et al. 10.3390/s18124314
- Performance of low-cost indoor air quality monitors for PM2.5 and PM10 from residential sources Z. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106654
- A User-Centric Design Thinking Approach for Advancement in Off-Line PM Air Samplers: Current Status and Future Directions K. Biswas et al. 10.1007/s41810-020-00071-5
- Incorporating Low-Cost Sensor Measurements into High-Resolution PM2.5 Modeling at a Large Spatial Scale J. Bi et al. 10.1021/acs.est.9b06046
- The Spatial and Temporal Variability of the Indoor Environmental Quality during Three Simulated Office Studies at a Living Lab N. Clements et al. 10.3390/buildings9030062
- Improvement of community monitoring network data for urban heat island investigation in Hong Kong Y. Lam et al. 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100852
- Air Pollution Effects on Mental Health Relationships: Scoping Review on Historically Used Methodologies to Analyze Adult Populations K. Leontjevaite et al. 10.3390/air2030016
- Estimating the spatial variability of fine particles at the neighborhood scale using a distributed network of particle sensors R. Shafran-Nathan et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117011
- In search of an optimal in-field calibration method of low-cost gas sensors for ambient air pollutants: Comparison of linear, multilinear and artificial neural network approaches D. Topalović et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.028
- Long-term behavior and stability of calibration models for NO and NO<sub>2</sub> low-cost sensors H. Kim et al. 10.5194/amt-15-2979-2022
- Statistical data pre-processing and time series incorporation for high-efficacy calibration of low-cost NO2 sensor using machine learning S. Koziel et al. 10.1038/s41598-024-59993-6
- Applications of low-cost sensing technologies for air quality monitoring and exposure assessment: How far have they gone? L. Morawska et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2018.04.018
- A Smart Rig for Calibration of Gas Sensor Nodes M. Benammar et al. 10.3390/s20082341
- Key factors in epidemiological exposure and insights for environmental management: Evidence from meta-analysis Y. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124991
- A Novel Method for Removing Baseline Drifts in Multivariate Chemical Sensor A. Grover & B. Lall 10.1109/TIM.2020.2976224
- Personal exposure to fine particulate air pollutants impacts blood pressure and heart rate variability D. Lee et al. 10.1038/s41598-020-73205-x
- First-Principles Algorithm for Air Quality Electrochemical Gas Sensors B. Ouyang 10.1021/acssensors.0c01129
- Low cost air pollution monitoring systems: A review of protocols and enabling technologies Z. Idrees & L. Zheng 10.1016/j.jii.2019.100123
- Missing Data Imputation on IoT Sensor Networks: Implications for on-Site Sensor Calibration N. Okafor & D. Delaney 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3105442
- Seasonal Influence on the Performance of Low-Cost NO2 Sensor Calibrations S. Ratingen et al. 10.3390/s21237919
- Analysis of fine particle pollution data measured at 29 US diplomatic posts worldwide R. Dhammapala 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.05.070
- Fleet-based vehicle emission factors using low-cost sensors: Case study in parking garages B. Liu & N. Zimmerman 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102635
- Low-Cost Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring - the Current State of the Technology and a Use Overview P. Buček et al. 10.2478/cdem-2021-0003
- Wildland Fires Worsened Population Exposure to PM2.5 Pollution in the Contiguous United States D. Zhang et al. 10.1021/acs.est.3c05143
- Feasibility and acceptability of monitoring personal air pollution exposure with sensors for asthma self-management S. Xie et al. 10.1186/s40733-021-00079-9
- Nonlinear Regression Approach as a Correction Factor of Measurements of Low-Cost Electrochemical Air Quality Sensors I. Christakis et al. 10.3390/app14083282
- Mindful Application of Digitalization for Sustainable Development: The Digitainability Assessment Framework S. Gupta & J. Rhyner 10.3390/su14053114
- Continuous in-home PM2.5 concentrations of smokers with and without a history of respiratory exacerbations in Iowa, during and after an air purifier intervention E. Stapleton et al. 10.1038/s41370-020-0235-1
- Air quality assessment system based on self-driven drone and LoRaWAN network A. Simo et al. 10.1016/j.comcom.2021.04.032
- What can we learn from nested IoT low‐cost sensor networks for air quality? A case study of PM2.5 in Birmingham, UK N. Cowell et al. 10.1002/met.2220
- Agent-based modeling to estimate exposures to urban air pollution from transportation: Exposure disparities and impacts of high-resolution data S. Gurram et al. 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.01.002
- ICT Y. Cheng et al. 10.1145/3314393
- Research of low-cost air quality monitoring models with different machine learning algorithms G. Wang et al. 10.5194/amt-17-181-2024
- Correction and Accuracy of PurpleAir PM2.5 Measurements for Extreme Wildfire Smoke K. Barkjohn et al. 10.3390/s22249669
- A machine learning calibration model using random forests to improve sensor performance for lower-cost air quality monitoring N. Zimmerman et al. 10.5194/amt-11-291-2018
- Evaluation of low-cost optical particle counters for monitoring individual indoor aerosol sources P. Salimifard et al. 10.1080/02786826.2019.1697423
- Low-cost sensors for measuring airborne particulate matter: Field evaluation and calibration at a South-Eastern European site G. Kosmopoulos et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141396
- Deployment, Calibration, and Cross-Validation of Low-Cost Electrochemical Sensors for Carbon Monoxide, Nitrogen Oxides, and Ozone for an Epidemiological Study C. Zuidema et al. 10.3390/s21124214
- Characterization of Ambient Air Quality in Selected Urban Areas in Uganda Using Low-Cost Sensing and Measurement Technologies D. Okure et al. 10.1021/acs.est.1c01443
- The U.S. EPA wildland fire sensor challenge: Performance and evaluation of solver submitted multi-pollutant sensor systems M. Landis et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118165
- QUANT: a long-term multi-city commercial air sensor dataset for performance evaluation S. Diez et al. 10.1038/s41597-024-03767-2
- A novel application of mobile low-cost sensors for atmospheric particulate matter monitoring in open-pit mines A. Zafra-Pérez et al. 10.1016/j.eti.2022.102974
- Estimating daily PM2.5 concentrations in New York City at the neighborhood-scale: Implications for integrating non-regulatory measurements K. Huang et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134094
- Low-processing data enrichment and calibration for PM2.5 low-cost sensors D. Stojanovic et al. 10.2298/TSCI221109221S
- Leveraging Temporal Information to Improve Machine Learning-Based Calibration Techniques for Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors S. Ali et al. 10.3390/s24092930
- Design of an ozone and nitrogen dioxide sensor unit and its long-term operation within a sensor network in the city of Zurich M. Mueller et al. 10.5194/amt-10-3783-2017
- No one knows which city has the highest concentration of fine particulate matter R. Martin et al. 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100040
- Evaluating the Impact of Airborne Fine Particulate Matter and Heavy Metals on Oxidative Stress via Vitamin Supplementation E. Lee et al. 10.3390/toxics12070465
- Use of Low-Cost Air Quality Monitoring Devices for Assessment of Road Transport Related Emissions N. Celikkaya et al. 10.1016/j.trpro.2019.09.125
- An improved low-power measurement of ambient NO<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> combining electrochemical sensor clusters and machine learning K. Smith et al. 10.5194/amt-12-1325-2019
- Efficacy of Low-Cost Sensor Networks at Detecting Fine-Scale Variations in Particulate Matter in Urban Environments A. Heintzelman et al. 10.3390/ijerph20031934
- Assessment of air quality microsensors versus reference methods: The EuNetAir Joint Exercise – Part II C. Borrego et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.08.028
- IoT-Enabled Particulate Matter Monitoring and Forecasting Method Based on Cluster Analysis J. Yun & J. Woo 10.1109/JIOT.2020.3038862
- Laboratory evaluation of low-cost PurpleAir PM monitors and in-field correction using co-located portable filter samplers J. Tryner et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117067
- Establishing A Sustainable Low-Cost Air Quality Monitoring Setup: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art M. Narayana et al. 10.3390/s22010394
- Global Ozone (GO3) Project and AQTreks: Use of evolving technologies by students and citizen scientists to monitor air pollutants J. Ellenburg et al. 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100048
- A Statistical Calibration Framework for Improving Non-Reference Method Particulate Matter Reporting: A Focus on Community Air Monitoring Settings S. Commodore et al. 10.3390/atmos11080807
- Impact of California Fires on Local and Regional Air Quality: The Role of a Low‐Cost Sensor Network and Satellite Observations P. Gupta et al. 10.1029/2018GH000136
- An efficient spatiotemporal data calibration approach for the low-cost PM2.5 sensing network: A case study in Taiwan C. Lee et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2019.05.032
- Dynamic Measurement and Data Calibration for Aerial Mobile IoT J. Gu et al. 10.1109/JIOT.2020.2977910
- Practical Field Calibration of Portable Monitors for Mobile Measurements of Multiple Air Pollutants C. Lin et al. 10.3390/atmos8120231
- Long-term evaluation of air sensor technology under ambient conditions in Denver, Colorado S. Feinberg et al. 10.5194/amt-11-4605-2018
- Assessing the value of complex refractive index and particle density for calibration of low-cost particle matter sensor for size-resolved particle count and PM2.5 measurements C. Huang et al. 10.1371/journal.pone.0259745
- Particulate Matter in the Korea Train eXpress (KTX) Cabin and its Exposure C. Ma & G. Kang 10.5572/ajae.2022.041
- Improving Data Quality of Low-cost IoT Sensors in Environmental Monitoring Networks Using Data Fusion and Machine Learning Approach N. Okafor et al. 10.1016/j.icte.2020.06.004
- The evaluation and optimization of calibration methods for low-cost particulate matter sensors: Inter-comparison between fixed and mobile methods X. Qin et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136791
- Assessing the effects of mobility on air quality: The Liverpool Smart Pedestrian project N. Verstaevel et al. 10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.276
- In-car particulate matter exposure across ten global cities P. Kumar et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141395
- The Development of a Low-Cost Particulate Matter 2.5 Sensor Calibration Model in Daycare Centers Using Long Short-Term Memory Algorithms H. Jeon et al. 10.3390/atmos14081228
- Application of Low-Cost Electrochemical Sensors to Aqueous Systems to Allow Automated Determination of NH3 and H2S in Water M. Cämmerer et al. 10.3390/s20102814
- Testing the performance of sensors for ozone pollution monitoring in a citizen science approach A. Ripoll et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.257
- Mapping Occupational Hazards with a Multi-sensor Network in a Heavy-Vehicle Manufacturing Facility C. Zuidema et al. 10.1093/annweh/wxy111
- Inter- versus Intracity Variations in the Performance and Calibration of Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensors: A Multicity Assessment in India S. V et al. 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.2c00257
- Calibration and assessment of electrochemical air quality sensors by co-location with regulatory-grade instruments D. Hagan et al. 10.5194/amt-11-315-2018
- Urban Air Quality Management at Low Cost Using Micro Air Sensors: A Case Study from Accra, Ghana C. Hodoli et al. 10.1021/acsestair.4c00172
- Calibration Assessment of Low-Cost Carbon Dioxide Sensors Using the Extremely Randomized Trees Algorithm T. Araújo et al. 10.3390/s23136153
- Assessing the Utility of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors over a 12-Week Period in the Cuyama Valley of California A. Mukherjee et al. 10.3390/s17081805
- How to Get the Best from Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors: Guidelines and Practical Recommendations E. Brattich et al. 10.3390/s20113073
- Performance Evaluation and Community Application of Low-Cost Sensors for Ozone and Nitrogen Dioxide R. Duvall et al. 10.3390/s16101698
- Development and evaluation of an open-source, low-cost distributed sensor network for environmental monitoring applications N. Gunawardena et al. 10.1088/1361-6501/aa97fb
- Disruptive Technologies for Environment and Health Research: An Overview of Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain, and Internet of Things F. M. Bublitz et al. 10.3390/ijerph16203847
275 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Application of Machine Learning for the in-Field Correction of a PM2.5 Low-Cost Sensor Network W. Wang et al. 10.3390/s20175002
- Errors in ambient gas concentration measurement caused by acoustic response of electrochemical gas sensors A. Farquhar et al. 10.1016/j.sna.2023.114254
- On-field test and data calibration of a low-cost sensor for fine particles exposure assessment Y. Jiang et al. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.111958
- Performance evaluation of light weight gas sensor system suitable for airborne applications against co-location gas analysers over Delhi A. Ahlawat et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134016
- Domain Adaptation-Based Deep Calibration of Low-Cost PM₂.₅ Sensors S. Jha et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3118454
- Optimising Citizen-Driven Air Quality Monitoring Networks for Cities S. Gupta et al. 10.3390/ijgi7120468
- Evaluating uncertainty in sensor networks for urban air pollution insights D. Peters et al. 10.5194/amt-15-321-2022
- Automated data scanning for dense networks of low-cost air quality instruments: Detection and differentiation of instrumental error and local to regional scale environmental abnormalities M. Alavi-Shoshtari et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.12.002
- Assessing the accuracy of commercially available gas sensors for the measurement of ambient ozone and nitrogen dioxide K. Isiugo et al. 10.1080/15459624.2018.1513135
- Anomaly Detection and Repairing for Improving Air Quality Monitoring F. Rollo et al. 10.3390/s23020640
- Spatially dense air pollutant sampling: Implications of spatial variability on the representativeness of stationary air pollutant monitors H. Li et al. 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100012
- Temporal changes in field calibration relationships for Aeroqual S500 O3 and NO2 sensor-based monitors N. Masey et al. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.07.087
- Modeling fine-grained spatio-temporal pollution maps with low-cost sensors S. Iyer et al. 10.1038/s41612-022-00293-z
- Secondhand smoke exposure in public and private high-rise multiunit housing serving low-income residents in New York City prior to federal smoking ban in public housing, 2018 E. Anastasiou et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135322
- Interpreting Mobile and Handheld Air Sensor Readings in Relation to Air Quality Standards and Health Effect Reference Values: Tackling the Challenges G. Woodall et al. 10.3390/atmos8100182
- Added Value of Vaisala AQT530 Sensors as a Part of a Sensor Network for Comprehensive Air Quality Monitoring T. Petäjä et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2021.719567
- Low- and Medium-Cost Sensors for Tropospheric Ozone Monitoring—Results of an Evaluation Study in Wrocław, Poland M. Badura et al. 10.3390/atmos13040542
- Developing a Modular Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Platform for Air Pollution Profiling Q. Gu et al. 10.3390/s18124363
- Evaluation of high-resolution GRAMM–GRAL (v15.12/v14.8) NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> simulations over the city of Zürich, Switzerland A. Berchet et al. 10.5194/gmd-10-3441-2017
- Pilot study of the vertical variations in outdoor pollutant concentrations and environmental conditions along the height of a tall building P. Azimi et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.04.031
- Outlier detection and gap filling methodologies for low-cost air quality measurements T. Ottosen & P. Kumar 10.1039/C8EM00593A
- Impacts of pollution heterogeneity on population exposure in dense urban areas using ultra-fine resolution air quality data W. Che et al. 10.1016/j.jes.2022.02.041
- Reversible Electrochemical Gelation of Metal Chalcogenide Quantum Dots C. Hewa-Rahinduwage et al. 10.1021/jacs.0c03156
- Development and evaluation of a palm-sized optical PM2.5sensor T. Nakayama et al. 10.1080/02786826.2017.1375078
- End-user perspective of low-cost sensors for outdoor air pollution monitoring A. Rai et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.266
- Laboratory evaluation of particle-size selectivity of optical low-cost particulate matter sensors J. Kuula et al. 10.5194/amt-13-2413-2020
- A systematic investigation on the effects of temperature and relative humidity on the performance of eight low-cost particle sensors and devices Y. Zou et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2020.105715
- Evaluation of low-cost gas sensors to quantify intra-urban variability of atmospheric pollutants A. Baruah et al. 10.1039/D2EA00165A
- Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors: One-Year Field Comparative Measurement of Different Gas Sensors and Particle Counters with Reference Monitors at Tušimice Observatory P. Bauerová et al. 10.3390/atmos11050492
- Field Evaluation of Low-Cost PM Sensors (Purple Air PA-II) Under Variable Urban Air Quality Conditions, in Greece I. Stavroulas et al. 10.3390/atmos11090926
- Advances in Application of Air Quality Sensors in Environmental Monitoring 英. 宋 10.12677/AEP.2019.93037
- Spatial modelling of particulate matter air pollution sensor measurements collected by community scientists while cycling, land use regression with spatial cross-validation, and applications of machine learning for data correction M. Adams et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117479
- Significance of sources and size distribution on calibration of low-cost particle sensors: Evidence from a field sampling campaign V. Malyan et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2022.106114
- Spatial and temporal variability of urban cyclists’ exposure to PM2.5 in Medellín, Colombia J. Martínez et al. 10.1016/j.apr.2023.101946
- Insights about the Sources of PM2.5 in an Urban Area from Measurements of a Low-Cost Sensor Network G. Kosmopoulos et al. 10.3390/atmos13030440
- The Imperial County Community Air Monitoring Network: A Model for Community-based Environmental Monitoring for Public Health Action P. English et al. 10.1289/EHP1772
- Using a network of lower-cost monitors to identify the influence of modifiable factors driving spatial patterns in fine particulate matter concentrations in an urban environment S. Rose Eilenberg et al. 10.1038/s41370-020-0255-x
- In Situ Calibration Algorithms for Environmental Sensor Networks: A Review F. Delaine et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2019.2910317
- Tropical Air Chemistry in Lagos, Nigeria A. Odu-Onikosi et al. 10.3390/atmos13071059
- From low-cost sensors to high-quality data: A summary of challenges and best practices for effectively calibrating low-cost particulate matter mass sensors M. Giordano et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105833
- Evaluation of low-cost sensors for quantitative personal exposure monitoring S. Mahajan & P. Kumar 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102076
- City Scale Particulate Matter Monitoring Using LoRaWAN Based Air Quality IoT Devices S. Johnston et al. 10.3390/s19010209
- Development of Low-Cost Air Quality Stations for Next Generation Monitoring Networks: Calibration and Validation of PM2.5 and PM10 Sensors A. Cavaliere et al. 10.3390/s18092843
- Long-term sensor measurements of lung deposited surface area of particulate matter emitted from local vehicular and residential wood combustion sources J. Kuula et al. 10.1080/02786826.2019.1668909
- Community-based participatory research for the study of air pollution: a review of motivations, approaches, and outcomes A. Commodore et al. 10.1007/s10661-017-6063-7
- Using Low-Cost Air Quality Sensor Networks to Improve the Spatial and Temporal Resolution of Concentration Maps F. Ahangar et al. 10.3390/ijerph16071252
- Contribution of low-cost sensor measurements to the prediction of PM2.5 levels: A case study in Imperial County, California, USA J. Bi et al. 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108810
- Environment-Adaptive Calibration System for Outdoor Low-Cost Electrochemical Gas Sensors B. Tian et al. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2916826
- Evaluation of the Performance of Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors at a High Mountain Station with Complex Meteorological Conditions H. Li et al. 10.3390/atmos11020212
- On Memory-Based Precise Calibration of Cost-Efficient NO2 Sensor Using Artificial Intelligence and Global Response Correction S. Koziel et al. 10.1016/j.knosys.2024.111564
- Challenges and Opportunities in Calibrating Low-Cost Environmental Sensors N. Nalakurthi et al. 10.3390/s24113650
- In-car and Near-road Exposure to PM2.5 and BC C. Ma & G. Kang 10.5572/ajae.2020.14.2.146
- Design and Evaluation of a Reliable Low-Cost Atmospheric Pollution Station in Urban Environment G. Astudillo et al. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2980736
- Using a distributed air sensor network to investigate the spatiotemporal patterns of PM2.5 concentrations R. Cao et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114549
- Understanding social and behavioral drivers and impacts of air quality sensor use B. Hubbell et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.275
- Field calibration of electrochemical NO<sub>2</sub> sensors in a citizen science context B. Mijling et al. 10.5194/amt-11-1297-2018
- Integrating Fixed Monitoring Systems with Low-Cost Sensors to Create High-Resolution Air Quality Maps for the Northern China Plain Region C. Chao et al. 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00174
- Response of low-cost sensors to high PM 2.5 concentrations during bushfire and haze events X. Liu et al. 10.1080/02786826.2024.2368733
- Low Cost Sensor With IoT LoRaWAN Connectivity and Machine Learning-Based Calibration for Air Pollution Monitoring S. Ali et al. 10.1109/TIM.2020.3034109
- Machine learning calibration of low-cost NO<sub>2</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> sensors: non-linear algorithms and their impact on site transferability P. Nowack et al. 10.5194/amt-14-5637-2021
- Assessment of aerosol persistence in ICUs via low-cost sensor network and zonal models K. Glenn et al. 10.1038/s41598-023-30778-7
- Humidity, density, and inlet aspiration efficiency correction improve accuracy of a low-cost sensor during field calibration at a suburban site in the North-Western Indo-Gangetic plain (NW-IGP) H. Pawar & B. Sinha 10.1080/02786826.2020.1719971
- Performance of a Low-Cost Sensor Community Air Monitoring Network in Imperial County, CA P. English et al. 10.3390/s20113031
- Leveraging low-cost sensors to predict nitrogen dioxide for epidemiologic exposure assessment C. Zuidema et al. 10.1038/s41370-024-00667-w
- A citizen science approach for enhancing public understanding of air pollution S. Mahajan et al. 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101800
- Response of consumer and research grade indoor air quality monitors to residential sources of fine particles B. Singer & W. Delp 10.1111/ina.12463
- Electrochemical Gas Sensors as Microphones D. Williams et al. 10.2139/ssrn.4094644
- End-User Feedback on a Low-Cost Portable Air Quality Sensor System—Are We There Yet? J. Robinson et al. 10.3390/s18113768
- Concentration-Temporal Multilevel Calibration of Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensors R. Day et al. 10.3390/su141610015
- Evaluation of a new low-cost particle sensor as an internet-of-things device for outdoor air quality monitoring F. Roberts et al. 10.1080/10962247.2022.2093293
- Examining the functional range of commercially available low‐cost airborne particle sensors and consequences for monitoring of indoor air quality in residences Y. Zou et al. 10.1111/ina.12621
- Investigating measurement variation of modified low-cost particle sensors S. Collingwood et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2019.04.017
- Gaussian process regression model for dynamically calibrating and surveilling a wireless low-cost particulate matter sensor network in Delhi T. Zheng et al. 10.5194/amt-12-5161-2019
- Air Quality Sensors and Data Adjustment Algorithms: When Is It No Longer a Measurement? G. Hagler et al. 10.1021/acs.est.8b01826
- A low-cost monitor for measurement of fine particulate matter and aerosol optical depth – Part 2: Citizen-science pilot campaign in northern Colorado B. Ford et al. 10.5194/amt-12-6385-2019
- Machine-learning-based precise cost-efficient NO2 sensor calibration by means of time series matching and global data pre-processing S. Koziel et al. 10.1016/j.jestch.2024.101729
- Air Quality in Puerto Rico in the Aftermath of Hurricane Maria: A Case Study on the Use of Lower Cost Air Quality Monitors R. Subramanian et al. 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00079
- Air pollution monitoring network using low-cost sensors, a case study in Hanoi, Vietnam T. Nguyen et al. 10.1088/1755-1315/266/1/012017
- UNI-CAL: A Universal AI-Driven Model for Air Pollutant Sensor Calibration With Domain-Specific Knowledge Inputs Y. Han et al. 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3410171
- Node-to-node field calibration of wireless distributed air pollution sensor network F. Kizel et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.09.042
- Particulate matters: student-led air quality research in the third-year environmental chemistry classroom and the field S. Gao et al. 10.1007/s00216-018-0972-3
- The Kansas City Transportation and Local-Scale Air Quality Study (KC-TRAQS): Integration of Low-Cost Sensors and Reference Grade Monitoring in a Complex Metropolitan Area. Part 1: Overview of the Project S. Kimbrough et al. 10.3390/chemosensors7020026
- Schoolchildren’s exposure to PM2.5: a student club–based air quality monitoring campaign using low-cost sensors L. Chen et al. 10.1007/s11869-020-00815-9
- Estimating concentrations for particle and gases in a mechanically ventilated building in Hong Kong: multivariate method and machine learning W. Che et al. 10.1007/s11869-021-01093-9
- Amperometric Gas Sensors as a Low Cost Emerging Technology Platform for Air Quality Monitoring Applications: A Review R. Baron & J. Saffell 10.1021/acssensors.7b00620
- Using crowd-sourced low-cost sensors in a land use regression of PM2.5 in 6 US cities T. Lu et al. 10.1007/s11869-022-01162-7
- Errors in Ambient Gas Concentration Measurement Caused by Acoustic Response of Electrochemical Gas Sensors D. Williams et al. 10.2139/ssrn.4159819
- Response Characterization of an Inexpensive Aerosol Sensor J. Kuula et al. 10.3390/s17122915
- Field evaluation of low-cost particulate matter sensors in high- and low-concentration environments T. Zheng et al. 10.5194/amt-11-4823-2018
- On the Security and Data Integrity of Low-Cost Sensor Networks for Air Quality Monitoring L. Luo et al. 10.3390/s18124451
- Effects of personal air pollution exposure on asthma symptoms, lung function and airway inflammation L. Chambers et al. 10.1111/cea.13130
- Low-Power Wide-Area technologies as building block for smart sensors in air quality measurements M. Knoll et al. 10.1007/s00502-018-0639-y
- The performance assessment of low-cost air pollution sensor in city and the prospect of the autonomous vehicle for air pollution reduction L. Phuong Linh et al. 10.1088/1757-899X/819/1/012018
- Evaluation of Cairpol and Aeroqual Air Sensors in Biomass Burning Plumes A. Whitehill et al. 10.3390/atmos13060877
- CLEAN - Collaborative low-cost environmental and air-quality network F. Campo et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105664
- Nitrogen Dioxide, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Transportation in Urban Areas: Lessons From the Covid-19 Pandemic C. Restrepo 10.3389/fenvs.2021.689985
- A Low-Cost Optoacoustic Sensor for Environmental Monitoring A. Stylogiannis et al. 10.3390/s21041379
- Air Quality Sensor Networks for Evidence-Based Policy Making: Best Practices for Actionable Insights J. Hofman et al. 10.3390/atmos13060944
- High-performance machine-learning-based calibration of low-cost nitrogen dioxide sensor using environmental parameter differentials and global data scaling S. Koziel et al. 10.1038/s41598-024-77214-y
- A protocol for measuring the impact of a smoke-free housing policy on indoor tobacco smoke exposure R. Cardozo et al. 10.1186/s12889-019-7043-3
- Investigation of LASSO Regression Method as a Correction Measurements’ Factor for Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors I. Christakis et al. 10.3390/signals5010004
- Performance evaluation of MeteoTracker mobile sensor for outdoor applications F. Barbano et al. 10.5194/amt-17-3255-2024
- Testing the performance of field calibration techniques for low-cost gas sensors in new deployment locations: across a county line and across Colorado J. Casey & M. Hannigan 10.5194/amt-11-6351-2018
- Self-Portraits of Personal Exposure to Air Pollution: on where and when People Are Exposed, and on why it Is Difficult to Avoid N. da Schio 10.1007/s10745-020-00176-y
- Low-Cost Air Quality Monitoring Tools: From Research to Practice (A Workshop Summary) A. Clements et al. 10.3390/s17112478
- Design Considerations for a Distributed Low-Cost Air Quality Sensing System for Urban Environments in Low-Resource Settings E. Bainomugisha et al. 10.3390/atmos14020354
- Understanding the effect of temperature and relative humidity on sensor sensitivities in field environments and improving the calibration models of multiple electrochemical carbon monoxide (CO) sensors in a tropical environment R. Ariyaratne et al. 10.1016/j.snb.2023.133935
- The BErkeley Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> Observation Network: field calibration and evaluation of low-cost air quality sensors J. Kim et al. 10.5194/amt-11-1937-2018
- Field comparison of electrochemical gas sensor data correction algorithms for ambient air measurements Y. Liang et al. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128897
- Evaluating the Performance of Using Low-Cost Sensors to Calibrate for Cross-Sensitivities in a Multipollutant Network M. Levy Zamora et al. 10.1021/acsestengg.1c00367
- Precision and Accuracy of a Direct-Reading Miniaturized Monitor in PM2.5 Exposure Assessment F. Borghi et al. 10.3390/s18093089
- Ambient Air Quality Measurement with Low-Cost Optical and Electrochemical Sensors: An Evaluation of Continuous Year-Long Operation J. Bílek et al. 10.3390/environments8110114
- Association between microenvironment air quality and cardiovascular health outcomes Y. Tan et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137027
- Evaluation methods for low-cost particulate matter sensors J. Bean 10.5194/amt-14-7369-2021
- Characterising a mobile reference station (MoRS) to quantify personal exposure to air quality M. Hedges et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120160
- Atomically dispersed Pb ionic sites in PbCdSe quantum dot gels enhance room-temperature NO2 sensing X. Geng et al. 10.1038/s41467-021-25192-4
- Association between particulate matter and respiratory symptoms in students in the municipality of Guachetá, Colombia B. Saavedra Bayona et al. 10.17533/udea.redin.20210954
- Evaluation of two collocated federal equivalent method PM2.5 instruments over a wide range of concentrations in Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina G. Hagler et al. 10.1016/j.apr.2022.101374
- Fine particle mass monitoring with low-cost sensors: Corrections and long-term performance evaluation C. Malings et al. 10.1080/02786826.2019.1623863
- Network of low-cost air quality sensors for monitoring indoor, outdoor, and personal PM2.5 exposure in Seattle during the 2020 wildfire season J. He et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119244
- Identification of indoor air quality events using a K-means clustering analysis of gas sensors data A. Caron et al. 10.1016/j.snb.2019.126709
- Air Quality Enhancement Districts: democratizing data to improve respiratory health K. Stevens et al. 10.1007/s13412-021-00670-9
- Effects of Road Traffic on the Accuracy and Bias of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensor Measurements in Houston, Texas T. Oluwadairo et al. 10.3390/ijerph19031086
- A Survey on Sensor Calibration in Air Pollution Monitoring Deployments B. Maag et al. 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2853660
- Field evaluation of low-cost electrochemical air quality gas sensors under extreme temperature and relative humidity conditions R. Papaconstantinou et al. 10.5194/amt-16-3313-2023
- Effects of aerosol particle size on the measurement of airborne PM2.5 with a low-cost particulate matter sensor (LCPMS) in a laboratory chamber T. Oluwadairo et al. 10.1007/s10661-021-09715-6
- Minimized Training of Machine Learning-Based Calibration Methods for Low-Cost O3 Sensors S. Tondini et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2023.3339202
- Monitoring of greenhouse gases and pollutants across an urban area using a light-rail public transit platform L. Mitchell et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.05.044
- A Variational Bayesian Blind Calibration Approach for Air Quality Sensor Deployments G. Li et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2022.3212009
- Development of Air Quality Boxes Based on Low-Cost Sensor Technology for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring P. Gäbel et al. 10.3390/s22103830
- Review of low-cost sensors for indoor air quality: Features and applications M. Ródenas García et al. 10.1080/05704928.2022.2085734
- Probability-guaranteed distributed set-membership filtering over sensor networks: A stochastic communication protocol case H. Yu et al. 10.1016/j.sysconle.2024.105800
- Performance evaluation of twelve low-cost PM2.5 sensors at an ambient air monitoring site B. Feenstra et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116946
- Low-Cost Outdoor Air Quality Monitoring and Sensor Calibration F. Concas et al. 10.1145/3446005
- Leveraging Citizen Science and Low-Cost Sensors to Characterize Air Pollution Exposure of Disadvantaged Communities in Southern California T. Lu et al. 10.3390/ijerph19148777
- Youth Engaged Participatory Air Monitoring: A ‘Day in the Life’ in Urban Environmental Justice Communities J. Johnston et al. 10.3390/ijerph17010093
- A compact, modular and low-cost Internet of Things (IoT) platform for air quality monitoring in urban areas C. Spandonidis et al. 10.1088/1742-6596/1710/1/012004
- Low-cost sensors as an alternative for long-term air quality monitoring X. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109438
- Exploration of intra-city and inter-city PM2.5 regional calibration models to improve low-cost sensor performance S. Jain & N. Zimmerman 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2024.106335
- An overview of outdoor low-cost gas-phase air quality sensor deployments: current efforts, trends, and limitations K. Okorn & L. Iraci 10.5194/amt-17-6425-2024
- Calibrating low-cost sensors for ambient air monitoring: Techniques, trends, and challenges L. Liang 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111163
- Gaps and future directions in research on health effects of air pollution R. Vilcassim & G. Thurston 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104668
- SCAN B. Maag et al. 10.1145/3090084
- Estimating hourly PM2.5 concentrations at the neighborhood scale using a low-cost air sensor network: A Los Angeles case study Y. Lu et al. 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110653
- A Community-Based Sensor Network for Monitoring the Air Quality in Urban Romania L. Velea et al. 10.3390/atmos14050840
- Mobile phones as monitors of personal exposure to air pollution: Is this the future? M. Nyarku et al. 10.1371/journal.pone.0193150
- Measuring Spatial and Temporal PM2.5 Variations in Sacramento, California, Communities Using a Network of Low-Cost Sensors A. Mukherjee et al. 10.3390/s19214701
- Estimating Mass Concentration Using a Low-cost Portable Particle Counter Based on Full-year Observations: Issues to Obtain Reliable Atmospheric PM2.5 Data S. Ueda et al. 10.5572/ajae.2020.14.2.155
- Enhancing the reliability of particulate matter sensing by multivariate Tobit model using weather and air quality data W. Won et al. 10.1038/s41598-023-40468-z
- Design and integration of air pollutants monitoring system for emergency management in construction site based on BIM and edge computing Z. Xu et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108725
- Use of electrochemical sensors for measurement of air pollution: correcting interference response and validating measurements E. Cross et al. 10.5194/amt-10-3575-2017
- A New Black Carbon Sensor for Dense Air Quality Monitoring Networks J. Caubel et al. 10.3390/s18030738
- Development and field validation of a community-engaged particulate matter air quality monitoring network in Imperial, California, USA G. Carvlin et al. 10.1080/10962247.2017.1369471
- Low-Cost CO Sensor Calibration Using One Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network S. Ali et al. 10.3390/s23020854
- Identification of the Safe Variation Limits for the Optimization of the Measurements in Low-Cost Electrochemical Air Quality Sensors I. Christakis et al. 10.3390/electrochem5010001
- Low‐cost air quality monitoring networks for long‐term field campaigns: A review F. Carotenuto et al. 10.1002/met.2161
- Long-term field comparison of multiple low-cost particulate matter sensors in an outdoor urban environment F. Bulot et al. 10.1038/s41598-019-43716-3
- Deployment of networked low-cost sensors and comparison to real-time stationary monitors in New Delhi J. Prakash et al. 10.1080/10962247.2021.1890276
- A citizen science approach for air quality monitoring in a Kenyan informal development T. Manshur et al. 10.1016/j.cacint.2023.100105
- Impact Analysis of Temperature and Humidity Conditions on Electrochemical Sensor Response in Ambient Air Quality Monitoring P. Wei et al. 10.3390/s18020059
- Influence of particle properties and environmental factors on the performance of typical particle monitors and low-cost particle sensors in the market of China D. Wu et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118825
- MAIC: Metalearning-Based Adaptive In-Field Calibration for IoT Air Quality Monitoring System N. Liu et al. 10.1109/JIOT.2022.3150849
- Quantifying Neighborhood-Scale Spatial Variations of Ozone at Open Space and Urban Sites in Boulder, Colorado Using Low-Cost Sensor Technology L. Cheadle et al. 10.3390/s17092072
- Citizen as Sensors' Commitment in Urban Public Action G. l'Her et al. 10.4018/IJEPR.2019100103
- Wildfire Smoke Adjustment Factors for Low-Cost and Professional PM2.5 Monitors with Optical Sensors W. Delp & B. Singer 10.3390/s20133683
- Air pollution measurement errors: is your data fit for purpose? S. Diez et al. 10.5194/amt-15-4091-2022
- Application of Gaussian Mixture Regression for the Correction of Low Cost PM2.5 Monitoring Data in Accra, Ghana C. McFarlane et al. 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00217
- Laboratory Evaluations of Correction Equations with Multiple Choices for Seed Low-Cost Particle Sensing Devices in Sensor Networks W. Wang et al. 10.3390/s20133661
- Field and laboratory performance evaluations of 28 gas-phase air quality sensors by the AQ-SPEC program A. Collier-Oxandale et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117092
- Technical note: Understanding the effect of COVID-19 on particle pollution using a low-cost sensor network E. Chadwick et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105766
- Data Quality in IoT-Based Air Quality Monitoring Systems: a Systematic Mapping Study J. Buelvas et al. 10.1007/s11270-023-06127-9
- Intra-urban spatial variability of surface ozone in Riverside, CA: viability and validation of low-cost sensors K. Sadighi et al. 10.5194/amt-11-1777-2018
- Robust statistical calibration and characterization of portable low-cost air quality monitoring sensors to quantify real-time O<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations in diverse environments R. Sahu et al. 10.5194/amt-14-37-2021
- Evaluation of calibration performance of a low-cost particulate matter sensor using collocated and distant NO2 K. Ko et al. 10.5194/amt-17-3303-2024
- Review of the Performance of Low-Cost Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring F. Karagulian et al. 10.3390/atmos10090506
- Methodology for Addressing Infectious Aerosol Persistence in Real-Time Using Sensor Network S. Makhsous et al. 10.3390/s21113928
- Low-cost urban carbon monitoring network and implications for china: a comprehensive review H. Jiang et al. 10.1007/s11356-023-29836-4
- Features and Practicability of the Next-Generation Sensors and Monitors for Exposure Assessment to Airborne Pollutants: A Systematic Review G. Fanti et al. 10.3390/s21134513
- Estimating personal exposures from a multi-hazard sensor network C. Zuidema et al. 10.1038/s41370-019-0146-1
- Examining spatiotemporal variability of urban particulate matter and application of high-time resolution data from a network of low-cost air pollution sensors S. Feinberg et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.026
- Challenges and opportunities of low-cost sensors in capturing the impacts of construction activities on neighborhood air quality W. Jaafar et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111363
- Data Evaluation of a Low-Cost Sensor Network for Atmospheric Particulate Matter Monitoring in 15 Municipalities in Serbia D. Stojanović et al. 10.3390/s24134052
- Development and application of a United States-wide correction for PM<sub>2.5</sub> data collected with the PurpleAir sensor K. Barkjohn et al. 10.5194/amt-14-4617-2021
- Bio(sensors) based on molecularly imprinted polymers and silica materials used for food safety and biomedical analysis: Recent trends and future prospects X. Yan et al. 10.1016/j.talanta.2024.126292
- Performance evaluation of ozone and particulate matter sensors H. DeWitt et al. 10.1080/10962247.2020.1713921
- Effect of Three-Dimensional-Printed Thermoplastics Used in Sensor Housings on Common Atmospheric Trace Gasses T. Mangin et al. 10.3390/s24082610
- Distant calibration of low-cost PM and NO2 sensors; evidence from multiple sensor testbeds J. Hofman et al. 10.1016/j.apr.2021.101246
- Emulation of a Chemical Transport Model to Assess Air Quality under Future Emission Scenarios for the Southwest of Western Australia S. Vander Hoorn et al. 10.3390/atmos13122009
- Effect of environmental conditions on the performance of a low-cost atmospheric particulate matter sensor B. Macías-Hernández et al. 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101753
- Calibration and Inter-Unit Consistency Assessment of an Electrochemical Sensor System Using Machine Learning I. Apostolopoulos et al. 10.3390/s24134110
- A methodology for the characterization of portable sensors for air quality measure with the goal of deployment in citizen science B. Languille et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134698
- Community-Based Measurements Reveal Unseen Differences during Air Pollution Episodes K. Kelly et al. 10.1021/acs.est.0c02341
- Particulate Matter Emissions at Different Microenvironments Using Low-Cost Sensors in Megacity Dhaka, Bangladesh M. Nayeem et al. 10.3390/atmos15080897
- Dissecting PM sensor capabilities: A combined experimental and theoretical study on particle sizing and physicochemical properties X. Qin et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124354
- Cost-Efficient measurement platform and machine-learning-based sensor calibration for precise NO2 pollution monitoring A. Pietrenko-Dabrowska et al. 10.1016/j.measurement.2024.115168
- Predicting airborne pollutant concentrations and events in a commercial building using low-cost pollutant sensors and machine learning: A case study A. Mohammadshirazi et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108833
- A Review of Literature on the Usage of Low-Cost Sensors to Measure Particulate Matter A. Raysoni et al. 10.3390/earth4010009
- Spatial-Temporal Analysis of PM2.5 and NO2 Concentrations Collected Using Low-Cost Sensors in Peñuelas, Puerto Rico S. Reece et al. 10.3390/s18124314
- Performance of low-cost indoor air quality monitors for PM2.5 and PM10 from residential sources Z. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106654
- A User-Centric Design Thinking Approach for Advancement in Off-Line PM Air Samplers: Current Status and Future Directions K. Biswas et al. 10.1007/s41810-020-00071-5
- Incorporating Low-Cost Sensor Measurements into High-Resolution PM2.5 Modeling at a Large Spatial Scale J. Bi et al. 10.1021/acs.est.9b06046
- The Spatial and Temporal Variability of the Indoor Environmental Quality during Three Simulated Office Studies at a Living Lab N. Clements et al. 10.3390/buildings9030062
- Improvement of community monitoring network data for urban heat island investigation in Hong Kong Y. Lam et al. 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100852
- Air Pollution Effects on Mental Health Relationships: Scoping Review on Historically Used Methodologies to Analyze Adult Populations K. Leontjevaite et al. 10.3390/air2030016
- Estimating the spatial variability of fine particles at the neighborhood scale using a distributed network of particle sensors R. Shafran-Nathan et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117011
- In search of an optimal in-field calibration method of low-cost gas sensors for ambient air pollutants: Comparison of linear, multilinear and artificial neural network approaches D. Topalović et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.028
- Long-term behavior and stability of calibration models for NO and NO<sub>2</sub> low-cost sensors H. Kim et al. 10.5194/amt-15-2979-2022
- Statistical data pre-processing and time series incorporation for high-efficacy calibration of low-cost NO2 sensor using machine learning S. Koziel et al. 10.1038/s41598-024-59993-6
- Applications of low-cost sensing technologies for air quality monitoring and exposure assessment: How far have they gone? L. Morawska et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2018.04.018
- A Smart Rig for Calibration of Gas Sensor Nodes M. Benammar et al. 10.3390/s20082341
- Key factors in epidemiological exposure and insights for environmental management: Evidence from meta-analysis Y. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124991
- A Novel Method for Removing Baseline Drifts in Multivariate Chemical Sensor A. Grover & B. Lall 10.1109/TIM.2020.2976224
- Personal exposure to fine particulate air pollutants impacts blood pressure and heart rate variability D. Lee et al. 10.1038/s41598-020-73205-x
- First-Principles Algorithm for Air Quality Electrochemical Gas Sensors B. Ouyang 10.1021/acssensors.0c01129
- Low cost air pollution monitoring systems: A review of protocols and enabling technologies Z. Idrees & L. Zheng 10.1016/j.jii.2019.100123
- Missing Data Imputation on IoT Sensor Networks: Implications for on-Site Sensor Calibration N. Okafor & D. Delaney 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3105442
- Seasonal Influence on the Performance of Low-Cost NO2 Sensor Calibrations S. Ratingen et al. 10.3390/s21237919
- Analysis of fine particle pollution data measured at 29 US diplomatic posts worldwide R. Dhammapala 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.05.070
- Fleet-based vehicle emission factors using low-cost sensors: Case study in parking garages B. Liu & N. Zimmerman 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102635
- Low-Cost Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring - the Current State of the Technology and a Use Overview P. Buček et al. 10.2478/cdem-2021-0003
- Wildland Fires Worsened Population Exposure to PM2.5 Pollution in the Contiguous United States D. Zhang et al. 10.1021/acs.est.3c05143
- Feasibility and acceptability of monitoring personal air pollution exposure with sensors for asthma self-management S. Xie et al. 10.1186/s40733-021-00079-9
- Nonlinear Regression Approach as a Correction Factor of Measurements of Low-Cost Electrochemical Air Quality Sensors I. Christakis et al. 10.3390/app14083282
- Mindful Application of Digitalization for Sustainable Development: The Digitainability Assessment Framework S. Gupta & J. Rhyner 10.3390/su14053114
- Continuous in-home PM2.5 concentrations of smokers with and without a history of respiratory exacerbations in Iowa, during and after an air purifier intervention E. Stapleton et al. 10.1038/s41370-020-0235-1
- Air quality assessment system based on self-driven drone and LoRaWAN network A. Simo et al. 10.1016/j.comcom.2021.04.032
- What can we learn from nested IoT low‐cost sensor networks for air quality? A case study of PM2.5 in Birmingham, UK N. Cowell et al. 10.1002/met.2220
- Agent-based modeling to estimate exposures to urban air pollution from transportation: Exposure disparities and impacts of high-resolution data S. Gurram et al. 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.01.002
- ICT Y. Cheng et al. 10.1145/3314393
- Research of low-cost air quality monitoring models with different machine learning algorithms G. Wang et al. 10.5194/amt-17-181-2024
- Correction and Accuracy of PurpleAir PM2.5 Measurements for Extreme Wildfire Smoke K. Barkjohn et al. 10.3390/s22249669
- A machine learning calibration model using random forests to improve sensor performance for lower-cost air quality monitoring N. Zimmerman et al. 10.5194/amt-11-291-2018
- Evaluation of low-cost optical particle counters for monitoring individual indoor aerosol sources P. Salimifard et al. 10.1080/02786826.2019.1697423
- Low-cost sensors for measuring airborne particulate matter: Field evaluation and calibration at a South-Eastern European site G. Kosmopoulos et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141396
- Deployment, Calibration, and Cross-Validation of Low-Cost Electrochemical Sensors for Carbon Monoxide, Nitrogen Oxides, and Ozone for an Epidemiological Study C. Zuidema et al. 10.3390/s21124214
- Characterization of Ambient Air Quality in Selected Urban Areas in Uganda Using Low-Cost Sensing and Measurement Technologies D. Okure et al. 10.1021/acs.est.1c01443
- The U.S. EPA wildland fire sensor challenge: Performance and evaluation of solver submitted multi-pollutant sensor systems M. Landis et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118165
- QUANT: a long-term multi-city commercial air sensor dataset for performance evaluation S. Diez et al. 10.1038/s41597-024-03767-2
- A novel application of mobile low-cost sensors for atmospheric particulate matter monitoring in open-pit mines A. Zafra-Pérez et al. 10.1016/j.eti.2022.102974
- Estimating daily PM2.5 concentrations in New York City at the neighborhood-scale: Implications for integrating non-regulatory measurements K. Huang et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134094
- Low-processing data enrichment and calibration for PM2.5 low-cost sensors D. Stojanovic et al. 10.2298/TSCI221109221S
- Leveraging Temporal Information to Improve Machine Learning-Based Calibration Techniques for Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors S. Ali et al. 10.3390/s24092930
- Design of an ozone and nitrogen dioxide sensor unit and its long-term operation within a sensor network in the city of Zurich M. Mueller et al. 10.5194/amt-10-3783-2017
- No one knows which city has the highest concentration of fine particulate matter R. Martin et al. 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100040
- Evaluating the Impact of Airborne Fine Particulate Matter and Heavy Metals on Oxidative Stress via Vitamin Supplementation E. Lee et al. 10.3390/toxics12070465
- Use of Low-Cost Air Quality Monitoring Devices for Assessment of Road Transport Related Emissions N. Celikkaya et al. 10.1016/j.trpro.2019.09.125
- An improved low-power measurement of ambient NO<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> combining electrochemical sensor clusters and machine learning K. Smith et al. 10.5194/amt-12-1325-2019
- Efficacy of Low-Cost Sensor Networks at Detecting Fine-Scale Variations in Particulate Matter in Urban Environments A. Heintzelman et al. 10.3390/ijerph20031934
- Assessment of air quality microsensors versus reference methods: The EuNetAir Joint Exercise – Part II C. Borrego et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.08.028
- IoT-Enabled Particulate Matter Monitoring and Forecasting Method Based on Cluster Analysis J. Yun & J. Woo 10.1109/JIOT.2020.3038862
- Laboratory evaluation of low-cost PurpleAir PM monitors and in-field correction using co-located portable filter samplers J. Tryner et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117067
- Establishing A Sustainable Low-Cost Air Quality Monitoring Setup: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art M. Narayana et al. 10.3390/s22010394
- Global Ozone (GO3) Project and AQTreks: Use of evolving technologies by students and citizen scientists to monitor air pollutants J. Ellenburg et al. 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100048
- A Statistical Calibration Framework for Improving Non-Reference Method Particulate Matter Reporting: A Focus on Community Air Monitoring Settings S. Commodore et al. 10.3390/atmos11080807
- Impact of California Fires on Local and Regional Air Quality: The Role of a Low‐Cost Sensor Network and Satellite Observations P. Gupta et al. 10.1029/2018GH000136
- An efficient spatiotemporal data calibration approach for the low-cost PM2.5 sensing network: A case study in Taiwan C. Lee et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2019.05.032
- Dynamic Measurement and Data Calibration for Aerial Mobile IoT J. Gu et al. 10.1109/JIOT.2020.2977910
- Practical Field Calibration of Portable Monitors for Mobile Measurements of Multiple Air Pollutants C. Lin et al. 10.3390/atmos8120231
- Long-term evaluation of air sensor technology under ambient conditions in Denver, Colorado S. Feinberg et al. 10.5194/amt-11-4605-2018
- Assessing the value of complex refractive index and particle density for calibration of low-cost particle matter sensor for size-resolved particle count and PM2.5 measurements C. Huang et al. 10.1371/journal.pone.0259745
- Particulate Matter in the Korea Train eXpress (KTX) Cabin and its Exposure C. Ma & G. Kang 10.5572/ajae.2022.041
- Improving Data Quality of Low-cost IoT Sensors in Environmental Monitoring Networks Using Data Fusion and Machine Learning Approach N. Okafor et al. 10.1016/j.icte.2020.06.004
- The evaluation and optimization of calibration methods for low-cost particulate matter sensors: Inter-comparison between fixed and mobile methods X. Qin et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136791
- Assessing the effects of mobility on air quality: The Liverpool Smart Pedestrian project N. Verstaevel et al. 10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.276
- In-car particulate matter exposure across ten global cities P. Kumar et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141395
- The Development of a Low-Cost Particulate Matter 2.5 Sensor Calibration Model in Daycare Centers Using Long Short-Term Memory Algorithms H. Jeon et al. 10.3390/atmos14081228
- Application of Low-Cost Electrochemical Sensors to Aqueous Systems to Allow Automated Determination of NH3 and H2S in Water M. Cämmerer et al. 10.3390/s20102814
- Testing the performance of sensors for ozone pollution monitoring in a citizen science approach A. Ripoll et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.257
- Mapping Occupational Hazards with a Multi-sensor Network in a Heavy-Vehicle Manufacturing Facility C. Zuidema et al. 10.1093/annweh/wxy111
- Inter- versus Intracity Variations in the Performance and Calibration of Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensors: A Multicity Assessment in India S. V et al. 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.2c00257
- Calibration and assessment of electrochemical air quality sensors by co-location with regulatory-grade instruments D. Hagan et al. 10.5194/amt-11-315-2018
- Urban Air Quality Management at Low Cost Using Micro Air Sensors: A Case Study from Accra, Ghana C. Hodoli et al. 10.1021/acsestair.4c00172
- Calibration Assessment of Low-Cost Carbon Dioxide Sensors Using the Extremely Randomized Trees Algorithm T. Araújo et al. 10.3390/s23136153
- Assessing the Utility of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors over a 12-Week Period in the Cuyama Valley of California A. Mukherjee et al. 10.3390/s17081805
- How to Get the Best from Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors: Guidelines and Practical Recommendations E. Brattich et al. 10.3390/s20113073
3 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Performance Evaluation and Community Application of Low-Cost Sensors for Ozone and Nitrogen Dioxide R. Duvall et al. 10.3390/s16101698
- Development and evaluation of an open-source, low-cost distributed sensor network for environmental monitoring applications N. Gunawardena et al. 10.1088/1361-6501/aa97fb
- Disruptive Technologies for Environment and Health Research: An Overview of Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain, and Internet of Things F. M. Bublitz et al. 10.3390/ijerph16203847
Discussed (final revised paper)
Discussed (final revised paper)
Latest update: 23 Nov 2024
Short summary
Emerging lower cost and miniaturized sensors have potential to increase spatial and temporal information on air pollution. To evaluate these technologies, air quality sensor devices were collocated with regulatory-grade instruments in a suburban outdoor setting in the southeastern United States. Additionally, a multi-node sensor network, with several nodes solar-powered and wirelessly transmitting data, was established to test the feasibility of high density, continuous air monitoring.
Emerging lower cost and miniaturized sensors have potential to increase spatial and temporal...