Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/amtd-7-2339-2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/amtd-7-2339-2014

  07 Mar 2014

07 Mar 2014

Review status: this preprint has been withdrawn by the authors. Please read the editorial note.

Binning effects on in-situ raindrop size distribution measurements

R. Checa-Garcia1, A. Tokay2,3, and F. J. Tapiador4 R. Checa-Garcia et al.
  • 1Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research (IMK), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany
  • 2Joint Center for Earth Systems Technology, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, USA
  • 3NASA Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
  • 4Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Biochemistry. University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain

Abstract. This paper investigates the binning effects on drop size distribution (DSD) measurements obtained by Joss-Waldvogel disdrometer (JWD), Precipitation Occurrence Sensor System (POSS), Thies disdrometer (Thies), Parsivel OTT disdrometer, two-dimensional video disdrometer (2DVD) and optical spectro-pluviometer (OSP) instruments, therefore the evaluation comprises non-regular bin sizes and the effect of minimum and maximum measured sizes of drops. To achieve this goal, 2DVD measurements and simulated gamma size distributions were considered. The analysis of simulated gamma DSD binned according each instrument was performed to understand the role of discretisation and truncation effects together on the integral rainfall parameters and estimators of the DSD parameters. In addition, the drop-by-drop output of the 2DVD is binned to simulate the raw output of the other disdrometers which allowed us estimate sampling and binning effects on selected events from available dataset. From simulated DSD it has been found that binning effects exist in integral rainfall parameters and in the evaluation of DSD parameters of a gamma distribution. This study indicates that POSS and JWD exhibit underestimation of concentration and mean diameter due to binning. Thies and Parsivel report a positive bias for rainfall and reflectivity (reaching 5% for heavy rainfall intensity events). Regarding to DSD parameters, distributions of estimators for the shape and scale parameters were analyzed by moment, truncated moment and maximum likelihood methods. They reported noticeable differences between instruments for all methodologies of estimation applied. The measurements of 2DVD allow sampling error estimation of instruments with smaller capture areas than 2DVD. The results show that the instrument differences due to sampling were a~relevant uncertainty but that concentration, reflectivity and mass-weighted diameter were sensitive to binning.

This preprint has been withdrawn. Please read the editorial note first before accessing the preprint.

R. Checa-Garcia et al.

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

R. Checa-Garcia et al.

R. Checa-Garcia et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,632 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
890 656 86 1,632 58 61
  • HTML: 890
  • PDF: 656
  • XML: 86
  • Total: 1,632
  • BibTeX: 58
  • EndNote: 61
Views and downloads (calculated since 07 Mar 2014)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 07 Mar 2014)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 03 Mar 2021
Download

This preprint has been withdrawn. Please read the editorial note.

Please read the editorial note first before accessing the preprint