Articles | Volume 11, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3569-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3569-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
20 Jun 2018
Research article |
| 20 Jun 2018
| 20 Jun 2018
Assessing a low-cost methane sensor quantification system for use in complex rural and urban environments
Ashley Collier-Oxandale
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Environmental Engineering, University of Colorado
Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Joanna Gordon Casey
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado
Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Ricardo Piedrahita
Berkeley Air Monitoring Group, Boulder, CO 80302, USA
John Ortega
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
Hannah Halliday
NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23666, USA
Jill Johnston
Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern
California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
Michael P. Hannigan
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado
Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Viewed
Total article views: 5,175 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 12 Jan 2018)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,945 | 2,060 | 170 | 5,175 | 106 | 137 |
- HTML: 2,945
- PDF: 2,060
- XML: 170
- Total: 5,175
- BibTeX: 106
- EndNote: 137
Total article views: 3,907 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 20 Jun 2018)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,269 | 1,486 | 152 | 3,907 | 99 | 103 |
- HTML: 2,269
- PDF: 1,486
- XML: 152
- Total: 3,907
- BibTeX: 99
- EndNote: 103
Total article views: 1,268 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 12 Jan 2018)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 676 | 574 | 18 | 1,268 | 7 | 34 |
- HTML: 676
- PDF: 574
- XML: 18
- Total: 1,268
- BibTeX: 7
- EndNote: 34
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 5,175 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,991 with geography defined
and 184 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,907 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,767 with geography defined
and 140 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,268 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,224 with geography defined
and 44 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
46 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Addressing Low-Cost Methane Sensor Calibration Shortcomings with Machine Learning E. Kiplimo et al. 10.3390/atmos15111313
- Statistical shape analysis pre-processing of temperature modulated metal oxide gas sensor response for machine learning improved selectivity of gases detection in real atmospheric conditions V. Krivetskiy et al. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.129187
- Ideas and perspectives: Enhancing research and monitoring of carbon pools and land-to-atmosphere greenhouse gases exchange in developing countries D. Kim et al. 10.5194/bg-19-1435-2022
- Improving Air Pollutant Metal Oxide Sensor Quantification Practices through: An Exploration of Sensor Signal Normalization, Multi-Sensor and Universal Calibration Model Generation, and Physical Factors Such as Co-Location Duration and Sensor Age K. Okorn & M. Hannigan 10.3390/atmos12050645
- Technical note: Facilitating the use of low-cost methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) sensors in flux chambers – calibration, data processing, and an open-source make-it-yourself logger D. Bastviken et al. 10.5194/bg-17-3659-2020
- Flame-Made La2O3-Based Nanocomposite CO2 Sensors as Perspective Part of GHG Monitoring System M. Andreev et al. 10.3390/s21217297
- Reconstruction of high-frequency methane atmospheric concentration peaks from measurements using metal oxide low-cost sensors R. Rivera Martinez et al. 10.5194/amt-16-2209-2023
- Characterizing methane and total non-methane hydrocarbon levels in Los Angeles communities with oil and gas facilities using air quality monitors K. Okorn et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146194
- The River Runner: a low-cost sensor prototype for continuous dissolved greenhouse gas measurements M. Dalvai Ragnoli & G. Singer 10.5194/jsss-13-41-2024
- Methane Advances: Trends and Summary from Selected Studies S. Akpasi et al. 10.3390/methane3020016
- Development and machine learning-based calibration of low-cost multiparametric stations for the measurement of CO2 and CH4 in air R. Biagi et al. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29772
- Direct measurement of methane emissions from the upstream oil and gas sector: Review of measurement results and technology advances (2018–2022) X. Yang et al. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137693
- The evaluation and optimization of calibration methods for low-cost particulate matter sensors: Inter-comparison between fixed and mobile methods X. Qin et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136791
- Using gas-phase air quality sensors to disentangle potential sources in a Los Angeles neighborhood A. Collier-Oxandale et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117519
- Calibration of a Low-Cost Methane Sensor Using Machine Learning H. Mitchell et al. 10.3390/s24041066
- Characterization of inexpensive metal oxide sensor performance for trace methane detection D. Furuta et al. 10.5194/amt-15-5117-2022
- Determining methane mole fraction at a landfill site using the Figaro Taguchi gas sensor 2611-C00 and wind direction measurements A. Shah et al. 10.1039/D3EA00138E
- Compact Non-Dispersive Infrared Multi-Gas Sensing Platform for Large Scale Deployment with Sub-ppm Resolution B. Wastine et al. 10.3390/atmos13111789
- Quantile regression with a metal oxide sensors array for methane prediction over a municipal solid waste treatment plant E. Taguem et al. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.129590
- Methane Mitigation: Methods to Reduce Emissions, on the Path to the Paris Agreement E. Nisbet et al. 10.1029/2019RG000675
- Understanding the ability of low-cost MOx sensors to quantify ambient VOCs A. Collier-Oxandale et al. 10.5194/amt-12-1441-2019
- Development of a low-cost UAV-based system for CH4monitoring over oil fields S. Liu et al. 10.1080/09593330.2020.1724199
- Assessment of the applicability of a low-cost sensor–based methane monitoring system for continuous multi-channel sampling I. Nagahage et al. 10.1007/s10661-021-09290-w
- Design and evaluation of a low-cost sensor node for near-background methane measurement D. Furuta et al. 10.5194/amt-17-2103-2024
- Laboratory and field evaluation of a low-cost methane sensor and key environmental factors for sensor calibration J. Lin et al. 10.1039/D2EA00100D
- Characterising the methane gas and environmental response of the Figaro Taguchi Gas Sensor (TGS) 2611-E00 A. Shah et al. 10.5194/amt-16-3391-2023
- Hazardous Air Pollutants Associated with Upstream Oil and Natural Gas Development: A Critical Synthesis of Current Peer-Reviewed Literature D. Garcia-Gonzales et al. 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-043715
- Long-term reliability of the Figaro TGS 2600 solid-state methane sensor under low-Arctic conditions at Toolik Lake, Alaska W. Eugster et al. 10.5194/amt-13-2681-2020
- Methane (CH4) Detection System Using The TGS2611 Sensor and MQ-4 Sensor M. Ainur Rahma et al. 10.1088/1742-6596/2780/1/012034
- Exposure monitoring toward environmental justice L. Racz & W. Rish 10.1002/ieam.4534
- An overview of outdoor low-cost gas-phase air quality sensor deployments: current efforts, trends, and limitations K. Okorn & L. Iraci 10.5194/amt-17-6425-2024
- Quantification of Si dopant in β-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-based semiconductor gas sensors by total reflection X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (TXRF) D. Filatova et al. 10.26896/1028-6861-2022-88-8-5-9
- Utilization of a Low-Cost Sensor Array for Mobile Methane Monitoring J. Silberstein et al. 10.3390/s24020519
- Emissions of volatile organic compounds from crude oil processing – Global emission inventory and environmental release H. Rajabi et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138654
- Calibration and field deployment of low-cost sensor network to monitor underground pipeline leakage Y. Cho et al. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.131276
- Kitchen Area Air Quality Measurements in Northern Ghana: Evaluating the Performance of a Low-Cost Particulate Sensor within a Household Energy Study E. Coffey et al. 10.3390/atmos10070400
- Using metal oxide gas sensors to estimate the emission rates and locations of methane leaks in an industrial site: assessment with controlled methane releases R. Rivera-Martinez et al. 10.5194/amt-17-4257-2024
- The Potential of Low-Cost Tin-Oxide Sensors Combined with Machine Learning for Estimating Atmospheric CH4 Variations around Background Concentration R. Rivera Martinez et al. 10.3390/atmos12010107
- Design and Evaluation of a Reliable Low-Cost Atmospheric Pollution Station in Urban Environment G. Astudillo et al. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2980736
- Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Dots Induced Enhancement in CO2 Sensing Response From ZnO–Porous Silicon Hybrid Structure J. Ramos-Ramón et al. 10.3389/fchem.2020.00291
- Applications and Limitations of Quantifying Speciated and Source-Apportioned VOCs with Metal Oxide Sensors K. Okorn & M. Hannigan 10.3390/atmos12111383
- Quantification of Si Dopant in β-Ga2O3-Based Semiconductor Gas Sensors by Total Reflection X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy (TXRF) D. Filatova et al. 10.1134/S0020168523140066
- Chemical Exposures, Health, and Environmental Justice in Communities Living on the Fenceline of Industry J. Johnston & L. Cushing 10.1007/s40572-020-00263-8
- A cautionary report of calculating methane emissions using low-cost fence-line sensors S. Riddick et al. 10.1525/elementa.2022.00021
- Community-Based Health and Exposure Study around Urban Oil Developments in South Los Angeles B. Shamasunder et al. 10.3390/ijerph15010138
- Comparing Building and Neighborhood-Scale Variability of CO2 and O3 to Inform Deployment Considerations for Low-Cost Sensor System Use A. Collier-Oxandale et al. 10.3390/s18051349
42 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Addressing Low-Cost Methane Sensor Calibration Shortcomings with Machine Learning E. Kiplimo et al. 10.3390/atmos15111313
- Statistical shape analysis pre-processing of temperature modulated metal oxide gas sensor response for machine learning improved selectivity of gases detection in real atmospheric conditions V. Krivetskiy et al. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.129187
- Ideas and perspectives: Enhancing research and monitoring of carbon pools and land-to-atmosphere greenhouse gases exchange in developing countries D. Kim et al. 10.5194/bg-19-1435-2022
- Improving Air Pollutant Metal Oxide Sensor Quantification Practices through: An Exploration of Sensor Signal Normalization, Multi-Sensor and Universal Calibration Model Generation, and Physical Factors Such as Co-Location Duration and Sensor Age K. Okorn & M. Hannigan 10.3390/atmos12050645
- Technical note: Facilitating the use of low-cost methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) sensors in flux chambers – calibration, data processing, and an open-source make-it-yourself logger D. Bastviken et al. 10.5194/bg-17-3659-2020
- Flame-Made La2O3-Based Nanocomposite CO2 Sensors as Perspective Part of GHG Monitoring System M. Andreev et al. 10.3390/s21217297
- Reconstruction of high-frequency methane atmospheric concentration peaks from measurements using metal oxide low-cost sensors R. Rivera Martinez et al. 10.5194/amt-16-2209-2023
- Characterizing methane and total non-methane hydrocarbon levels in Los Angeles communities with oil and gas facilities using air quality monitors K. Okorn et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146194
- The River Runner: a low-cost sensor prototype for continuous dissolved greenhouse gas measurements M. Dalvai Ragnoli & G. Singer 10.5194/jsss-13-41-2024
- Methane Advances: Trends and Summary from Selected Studies S. Akpasi et al. 10.3390/methane3020016
- Development and machine learning-based calibration of low-cost multiparametric stations for the measurement of CO2 and CH4 in air R. Biagi et al. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29772
- Direct measurement of methane emissions from the upstream oil and gas sector: Review of measurement results and technology advances (2018–2022) X. Yang et al. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137693
- The evaluation and optimization of calibration methods for low-cost particulate matter sensors: Inter-comparison between fixed and mobile methods X. Qin et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136791
- Using gas-phase air quality sensors to disentangle potential sources in a Los Angeles neighborhood A. Collier-Oxandale et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117519
- Calibration of a Low-Cost Methane Sensor Using Machine Learning H. Mitchell et al. 10.3390/s24041066
- Characterization of inexpensive metal oxide sensor performance for trace methane detection D. Furuta et al. 10.5194/amt-15-5117-2022
- Determining methane mole fraction at a landfill site using the Figaro Taguchi gas sensor 2611-C00 and wind direction measurements A. Shah et al. 10.1039/D3EA00138E
- Compact Non-Dispersive Infrared Multi-Gas Sensing Platform for Large Scale Deployment with Sub-ppm Resolution B. Wastine et al. 10.3390/atmos13111789
- Quantile regression with a metal oxide sensors array for methane prediction over a municipal solid waste treatment plant E. Taguem et al. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.129590
- Methane Mitigation: Methods to Reduce Emissions, on the Path to the Paris Agreement E. Nisbet et al. 10.1029/2019RG000675
- Understanding the ability of low-cost MOx sensors to quantify ambient VOCs A. Collier-Oxandale et al. 10.5194/amt-12-1441-2019
- Development of a low-cost UAV-based system for CH4monitoring over oil fields S. Liu et al. 10.1080/09593330.2020.1724199
- Assessment of the applicability of a low-cost sensor–based methane monitoring system for continuous multi-channel sampling I. Nagahage et al. 10.1007/s10661-021-09290-w
- Design and evaluation of a low-cost sensor node for near-background methane measurement D. Furuta et al. 10.5194/amt-17-2103-2024
- Laboratory and field evaluation of a low-cost methane sensor and key environmental factors for sensor calibration J. Lin et al. 10.1039/D2EA00100D
- Characterising the methane gas and environmental response of the Figaro Taguchi Gas Sensor (TGS) 2611-E00 A. Shah et al. 10.5194/amt-16-3391-2023
- Hazardous Air Pollutants Associated with Upstream Oil and Natural Gas Development: A Critical Synthesis of Current Peer-Reviewed Literature D. Garcia-Gonzales et al. 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-043715
- Long-term reliability of the Figaro TGS 2600 solid-state methane sensor under low-Arctic conditions at Toolik Lake, Alaska W. Eugster et al. 10.5194/amt-13-2681-2020
- Methane (CH4) Detection System Using The TGS2611 Sensor and MQ-4 Sensor M. Ainur Rahma et al. 10.1088/1742-6596/2780/1/012034
- Exposure monitoring toward environmental justice L. Racz & W. Rish 10.1002/ieam.4534
- An overview of outdoor low-cost gas-phase air quality sensor deployments: current efforts, trends, and limitations K. Okorn & L. Iraci 10.5194/amt-17-6425-2024
- Quantification of Si dopant in β-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-based semiconductor gas sensors by total reflection X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (TXRF) D. Filatova et al. 10.26896/1028-6861-2022-88-8-5-9
- Utilization of a Low-Cost Sensor Array for Mobile Methane Monitoring J. Silberstein et al. 10.3390/s24020519
- Emissions of volatile organic compounds from crude oil processing – Global emission inventory and environmental release H. Rajabi et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138654
- Calibration and field deployment of low-cost sensor network to monitor underground pipeline leakage Y. Cho et al. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.131276
- Kitchen Area Air Quality Measurements in Northern Ghana: Evaluating the Performance of a Low-Cost Particulate Sensor within a Household Energy Study E. Coffey et al. 10.3390/atmos10070400
- Using metal oxide gas sensors to estimate the emission rates and locations of methane leaks in an industrial site: assessment with controlled methane releases R. Rivera-Martinez et al. 10.5194/amt-17-4257-2024
- The Potential of Low-Cost Tin-Oxide Sensors Combined with Machine Learning for Estimating Atmospheric CH4 Variations around Background Concentration R. Rivera Martinez et al. 10.3390/atmos12010107
- Design and Evaluation of a Reliable Low-Cost Atmospheric Pollution Station in Urban Environment G. Astudillo et al. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2980736
- Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Dots Induced Enhancement in CO2 Sensing Response From ZnO–Porous Silicon Hybrid Structure J. Ramos-Ramón et al. 10.3389/fchem.2020.00291
- Applications and Limitations of Quantifying Speciated and Source-Apportioned VOCs with Metal Oxide Sensors K. Okorn & M. Hannigan 10.3390/atmos12111383
- Quantification of Si Dopant in β-Ga2O3-Based Semiconductor Gas Sensors by Total Reflection X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy (TXRF) D. Filatova et al. 10.1134/S0020168523140066
4 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Chemical Exposures, Health, and Environmental Justice in Communities Living on the Fenceline of Industry J. Johnston & L. Cushing 10.1007/s40572-020-00263-8
- A cautionary report of calculating methane emissions using low-cost fence-line sensors S. Riddick et al. 10.1525/elementa.2022.00021
- Community-Based Health and Exposure Study around Urban Oil Developments in South Los Angeles B. Shamasunder et al. 10.3390/ijerph15010138
- Comparing Building and Neighborhood-Scale Variability of CO2 and O3 to Inform Deployment Considerations for Low-Cost Sensor System Use A. Collier-Oxandale et al. 10.3390/s18051349
Discussed (preprint)
Latest update: 30 Jan 2025
Short summary
Low-cost air quality sensors and air quality sensor systems have the potential to open up new ways of measuring pollutants. In this paper, we explored ways to use low-cost sensors (approximately USD 10 per sensor) to estimate methane – a pollutant important for its contributions to climate change. We found that while these sensors will likely never replace traditional air quality monitoring methods, they can provide useful supplementary information on local pollution sources and regional trends.
Low-cost air quality sensors and air quality sensor systems have the potential to open up new...
