Articles | Volume 11, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3569-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3569-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
20 Jun 2018
Research article |
| 20 Jun 2018
| 20 Jun 2018
Assessing a low-cost methane sensor quantification system for use in complex rural and urban environments
Ashley Collier-Oxandale
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Environmental Engineering, University of Colorado
Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Joanna Gordon Casey
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado
Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Ricardo Piedrahita
Berkeley Air Monitoring Group, Boulder, CO 80302, USA
John Ortega
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
Hannah Halliday
NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23666, USA
Jill Johnston
Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern
California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
Michael P. Hannigan
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado
Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Related authors
No articles found.
Daun Jeong, Rebecca S. Hornbrook, Alan J. Hills, Glenn Diskin, Hannah S. Halliday, Joshua P. DiGangi, Alan Fried, Dirk Richter, James Walega, Petter Weibring, Thomas F. Hanisco, Glenn M. Wolfe, Jason St. Clair, Jeff Peischl, Armin Wisthaler, Tomas Mikoviny, John B. Nowak, Felix Piel, Laura Tomsche, Christopher D. Holmes, Amber Soja, Emily Gargulinski, James H. Crawford, Jack Dibb, Carsten Warneke, Joshua Schwarz, and Eric C. Apel
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4703, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4703, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Short summary
Short summary
Formaldehyde is an important atmospheric species that is present at all times throughout the troposphere. Accurately measuring formaldehyde is necessary for understanding key atmospheric chemical cycles. We describe here the first wide-scale demonstration of the gas chromatographic mass spectrometric (GC/MS) technique (NSF NCAR TOGA-TOF) for quantifying formaldehyde in the atmosphere and we show this technique to be highly sensitive and selective.
Christopher D. Holmes, Joshua P. Schwarz, Charles H. Fite, Anxhelo Agastra, Holly K. Nowell, Katherine Ball, T. Paul Bui, Johnathan Dean-Day, Zachary C. J. Decker, Joshua P. DiGagni, Glenn S. Diskin, Emily M. Gargulinski, Hannah Halliday, Shobha Kondragunta, John B. Nowak, David A. Peterson, Michael A. Robinson, Amber J. Soja, Rebecca A. Washenfelder, Chuanyu Xu, and Robert J. Yokelson
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-307, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-307, 2025
Revised manuscript has not been submitted
Short summary
Short summary
Smoke age is an important factor in the chemical and physical evolution of smoke. Two methods for determining the age of smoke are applied to the NASA-NOAA FIREX-AQ field campaign: one based on wind speed and distance, and another using an ensemble of modeled air parcel trajectories. Both methods are evaluated, with the trajectory method, which includes plume rise and uncertainty estimates, proving more accurate.
Georgios I. Gkatzelis, Matthew M. Coggon, Chelsea E. Stockwell, Rebecca S. Hornbrook, Hannah Allen, Eric C. Apel, Megan M. Bela, Donald R. Blake, Ilann Bourgeois, Steven S. Brown, Pedro Campuzano-Jost, Jason M. St. Clair, James H. Crawford, John D. Crounse, Douglas A. Day, Joshua P. DiGangi, Glenn S. Diskin, Alan Fried, Jessica B. Gilman, Hongyu Guo, Johnathan W. Hair, Hannah S. Halliday, Thomas F. Hanisco, Reem Hannun, Alan Hills, L. Gregory Huey, Jose L. Jimenez, Joseph M. Katich, Aaron Lamplugh, Young Ro Lee, Jin Liao, Jakob Lindaas, Stuart A. McKeen, Tomas Mikoviny, Benjamin A. Nault, J. Andrew Neuman, John B. Nowak, Demetrios Pagonis, Jeff Peischl, Anne E. Perring, Felix Piel, Pamela S. Rickly, Michael A. Robinson, Andrew W. Rollins, Thomas B. Ryerson, Melinda K. Schueneman, Rebecca H. Schwantes, Joshua P. Schwarz, Kanako Sekimoto, Vanessa Selimovic, Taylor Shingler, David J. Tanner, Laura Tomsche, Krystal T. Vasquez, Patrick R. Veres, Rebecca Washenfelder, Petter Weibring, Paul O. Wennberg, Armin Wisthaler, Glenn M. Wolfe, Caroline C. Womack, Lu Xu, Katherine Ball, Robert J. Yokelson, and Carsten Warneke
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 929–956, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-929-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-929-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study reports emissions of gases and particles from wildfires. These emissions are related to chemical proxies that can be measured by satellite and incorporated into models to improve predictions of wildfire impacts on air quality and climate.
Laura Tomsche, Felix Piel, Tomas Mikoviny, Claus J. Nielsen, Hongyu Guo, Pedro Campuzano-Jost, Benjamin A. Nault, Melinda K. Schueneman, Jose L. Jimenez, Hannah Halliday, Glenn Diskin, Joshua P. DiGangi, John B. Nowak, Elizabeth B. Wiggins, Emily Gargulinski, Amber J. Soja, and Armin Wisthaler
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 2331–2343, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2331-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2331-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Ammonia (NH3) is an important trace gas in the atmosphere and fires are among the poorly investigated sources. During the 2019 Fire Influence on Regional to Global Environments and Air Quality (FIREX-AQ) aircraft campaign, we measured gaseous NH3 and particulate ammonium (NH4+) in smoke plumes emitted from 6 wildfires in the Western US and 66 small agricultural fires in the Southeastern US. We herein present a comprehensive set of emission factors of NH3 and NHx, where NHx = NH3 + NH4+.
Pamela S. Rickly, Hongyu Guo, Pedro Campuzano-Jost, Jose L. Jimenez, Glenn M. Wolfe, Ryan Bennett, Ilann Bourgeois, John D. Crounse, Jack E. Dibb, Joshua P. DiGangi, Glenn S. Diskin, Maximilian Dollner, Emily M. Gargulinski, Samuel R. Hall, Hannah S. Halliday, Thomas F. Hanisco, Reem A. Hannun, Jin Liao, Richard Moore, Benjamin A. Nault, John B. Nowak, Jeff Peischl, Claire E. Robinson, Thomas Ryerson, Kevin J. Sanchez, Manuel Schöberl, Amber J. Soja, Jason M. St. Clair, Kenneth L. Thornhill, Kirk Ullmann, Paul O. Wennberg, Bernadett Weinzierl, Elizabeth B. Wiggins, Edward L. Winstead, and Andrew W. Rollins
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 15603–15620, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15603-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15603-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Biomass burning sulfur dioxide (SO2) emission factors range from 0.27–1.1 g kg-1 C. Biomass burning SO2 can quickly form sulfate and organosulfur, but these pathways are dependent on liquid water content and pH. Hydroxymethanesulfonate (HMS) appears to be directly emitted from some fire sources but is not the sole contributor to the organosulfur signal. It is shown that HMS and organosulfur chemistry may be an important S(IV) reservoir with the fate dependent on the surrounding conditions.
Ilann Bourgeois, Jeff Peischl, J. Andrew Neuman, Steven S. Brown, Hannah M. Allen, Pedro Campuzano-Jost, Matthew M. Coggon, Joshua P. DiGangi, Glenn S. Diskin, Jessica B. Gilman, Georgios I. Gkatzelis, Hongyu Guo, Hannah A. Halliday, Thomas F. Hanisco, Christopher D. Holmes, L. Gregory Huey, Jose L. Jimenez, Aaron D. Lamplugh, Young Ro Lee, Jakob Lindaas, Richard H. Moore, Benjamin A. Nault, John B. Nowak, Demetrios Pagonis, Pamela S. Rickly, Michael A. Robinson, Andrew W. Rollins, Vanessa Selimovic, Jason M. St. Clair, David Tanner, Krystal T. Vasquez, Patrick R. Veres, Carsten Warneke, Paul O. Wennberg, Rebecca A. Washenfelder, Elizabeth B. Wiggins, Caroline C. Womack, Lu Xu, Kyle J. Zarzana, and Thomas B. Ryerson
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4901–4930, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4901-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4901-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding fire emission impacts on the atmosphere is key to effective air quality management and requires accurate measurements. We present a comparison of airborne measurements of key atmospheric species in ambient air and in fire smoke. We show that most instruments performed within instrument uncertainties. In some cases, further work is needed to fully characterize instrument performance. Comparing independent measurements using different techniques is important to assess their accuracy.
Jin Liao, Glenn M. Wolfe, Reem A. Hannun, Jason M. St. Clair, Thomas F. Hanisco, Jessica B. Gilman, Aaron Lamplugh, Vanessa Selimovic, Glenn S. Diskin, John B. Nowak, Hannah S. Halliday, Joshua P. DiGangi, Samuel R. Hall, Kirk Ullmann, Christopher D. Holmes, Charles H. Fite, Anxhelo Agastra, Thomas B. Ryerson, Jeff Peischl, Ilann Bourgeois, Carsten Warneke, Matthew M. Coggon, Georgios I. Gkatzelis, Kanako Sekimoto, Alan Fried, Dirk Richter, Petter Weibring, Eric C. Apel, Rebecca S. Hornbrook, Steven S. Brown, Caroline C. Womack, Michael A. Robinson, Rebecca A. Washenfelder, Patrick R. Veres, and J. Andrew Neuman
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 18319–18331, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18319-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18319-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Formaldehyde (HCHO) is an important oxidant precursor and affects the formation of O3 and other secondary pollutants in wildfire plumes. We disentangle the processes controlling HCHO evolution from wildfire plumes sampled by NASA DC-8 during FIREX-AQ. We find that OH abundance rather than normalized OH reactivity is the main driver of fire-to-fire variability in HCHO secondary production and estimate an effective HCHO yield per volatile organic compound molecule oxidized in wildfire plumes.
Zachary C. J. Decker, Michael A. Robinson, Kelley C. Barsanti, Ilann Bourgeois, Matthew M. Coggon, Joshua P. DiGangi, Glenn S. Diskin, Frank M. Flocke, Alessandro Franchin, Carley D. Fredrickson, Georgios I. Gkatzelis, Samuel R. Hall, Hannah Halliday, Christopher D. Holmes, L. Gregory Huey, Young Ro Lee, Jakob Lindaas, Ann M. Middlebrook, Denise D. Montzka, Richard Moore, J. Andrew Neuman, John B. Nowak, Brett B. Palm, Jeff Peischl, Felix Piel, Pamela S. Rickly, Andrew W. Rollins, Thomas B. Ryerson, Rebecca H. Schwantes, Kanako Sekimoto, Lee Thornhill, Joel A. Thornton, Geoffrey S. Tyndall, Kirk Ullmann, Paul Van Rooy, Patrick R. Veres, Carsten Warneke, Rebecca A. Washenfelder, Andrew J. Weinheimer, Elizabeth Wiggins, Edward Winstead, Armin Wisthaler, Caroline Womack, and Steven S. Brown
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 16293–16317, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16293-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16293-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
To understand air quality impacts from wildfires, we need an accurate picture of how wildfire smoke changes chemically both day and night as sunlight changes the chemistry of smoke. We present a chemical analysis of wildfire smoke as it changes from midday through the night. We use aircraft observations from the FIREX-AQ field campaign with a chemical box model. We find that even under sunlight typical
nighttimechemistry thrives and controls the fate of key smoke plume chemical processes.
Russell W. Long, Andrew Whitehill, Andrew Habel, Shawn Urbanski, Hannah Halliday, Maribel Colón, Surender Kaushik, and Matthew S. Landis
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 1783–1800, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1783-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1783-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This manuscript details field and laboratory-based evaluations of ozone monitoring methods in smoke. UV photometry, the most widely used measurement method for ozone in ambient air, was shown to suffer from a severe positive interference when operated in the presence of smoke, while chemiluminescence-based methods were shown to be free of interferences. The results detailed in this paper will provide monitoring agencies with the tools needed to address smoke-related ozone measurement challenges.
Demetrios Pagonis, Pedro Campuzano-Jost, Hongyu Guo, Douglas A. Day, Melinda K. Schueneman, Wyatt L. Brown, Benjamin A. Nault, Harald Stark, Kyla Siemens, Alex Laskin, Felix Piel, Laura Tomsche, Armin Wisthaler, Matthew M. Coggon, Georgios I. Gkatzelis, Hannah S. Halliday, Jordan E. Krechmer, Richard H. Moore, David S. Thomson, Carsten Warneke, Elizabeth B. Wiggins, and Jose L. Jimenez
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 1545–1559, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1545-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1545-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We describe the airborne deployment of an extractive electrospray time-of-flight mass spectrometer (EESI-MS). The instrument provides a quantitative 1 Hz measurement of the chemical composition of organic aerosol up to altitudes of
7 km, with single-compound detection limits as low as 50 ng per standard cubic meter.
Cited articles
Allen, D. T.: Methane emissions from natural gas production and use: reconciling bottom-up and top-down measurements, Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng., 5, 78–83, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2014.05.004, 2014.
Adgate, J. L., Goldstein, B. D., and McKenzie, L. M.: Potential public health hazards, exposures and health effects from unconventional natural gas development, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 8307–8320, https://doi.org/10.1021/es404621d, 2014.
Arfire, A., Marjovi, A., and Martinoli, A.: Mitigating slow dynamics of low-cost chemical sensors for mobile air quality monitoring sensor networks. ESWN '16 Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks, Conference Proceedings, 159–167, ISBN: 978-0-9949886-0-7, 2016.
Bamberger, I., Stieger, J., Buchmann, N., and Eugster, W.: Spatial variability of methane: attributing atmospheric concentrations to emissions, Environ. Pollut., 190, 65–74, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.03.028, 2014.
Biaggi-Labiosa, A., Sola, F., Lebron-Colon, M., Evans, L. J., Xu, J. C., Hunter, G., Berger, G. M., and Gonzalez, J. M.: A novel methane sensor based on porous SnO2 nanorods: room temperature to high temperature detection, Nanotechnology, 23, 45, https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/23/45/455501, 2012.
Boulder County: Past review of oil and gas development regulations, available at: https://www.bouldercounty.org/property-and-land/land-use/planning/oil-gas-development/history/, last access: 8 November 2017.
Casey J. G., Ortega, J., Coffey, E., and Hannigan, M.: Low-cost measurement techniques to characterize the influence of home heating fuel on carbon monoxide in Navajo homes, Sci. Total Environ., 625, 608–618, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.312, 2018.
Cheadle, L., Deanes, L., Sadighi, K., Casey, J. G., Collier-Oxandale, A., and Hannigan, M.: Quantifying neighborhood-scale spatial variations of ozone at open space and urban sites in Boulder, Colorado using low-cost sensor technology, Sensors, 17, 9, https://doi.org/10.3390/s17092072, 2017.
Clements, A., Griswold, W., RS, A., Johnston, J. E., Herting, M. M., Thorson, J., Collier-Oxandale, A., and Hannigan, M.: Low-cost air quality monitoring tools: from research to practice (a workshop summary), Sensors, 17, 2478, https://doi.org/10.3390/s17112478, 2017.
Collier, A., Knight, D., Hafich, K., Hannigan, M., Polmear, M., and Graves, B.: On the development and implementation of a project-based learning curriculum for air quality in K-12 schools, 2015 IEEE: Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Conference Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2015.7344246, 2015.
Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC), Wells, data layer, available at: http://cogcc.state.co.us/documents/data/downloads/gis/WELLS_SHP.ZIP (last access: 4 October 2017), 2015.
Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC): Online GIS Tool, available at: https://cogccmap.state.co.us/cogcc_gis_online/, last access: 4 October 2017.
Cross, E. S., Williams, L. R., Lewis, D. K., Magoon, G. R., Onasch, T. B., Kaminsky, M. L., Worsnop, D. R., and Jayne, J. T.: Use of electrochemical sensors for measurement of air pollution: correcting interference response and validating measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 3575–3588, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3575-2017, 2017.
Davis K. J., Deng A., Lauvaux T., Miles N. L., Richardson S. J., Sarmiento D. P., Kevin R., Gurney, R., Hardesty, M., Bonin, T. A., Brewer, W. A., Lamb, B. K., Shepson, P. B., Harvey, R. M., Cambaliza, M. O., Sweeney, C., Turnbull, J. C., Whetstone, J., and Karion, A.: The Indianapolis flux experiment (INFLUX): a test-bed for developing urban greenhouse gas emission measurements, Elem. Sci. Anth. 5, 21, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.188, 2017.
De Vito, S., Massera, E., Piga, M., Martinotto, L., and Di Francia, G.: On field calibration of an electronic nose for benzene estimation in an urban pollution monitoring scenario, Sensor. Actuat. B-Chem., 129, 750–57, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2007.09.060, 2008.
DISCOVER-AQ: Database, https://doi.org/10.5067/Aircraft/DISCOVER-AQ/Aerosol-TraceGas, 2015.
Etheridge, D. M., Steele, L. P., Francey, R. J., and Langenfelds, R. L.: Atmospheric methane between 1000 A.D. and present: evidence of anthropogenic emissions and climatic variability, J. Geophys. Res-Atmos., 103, 15979–15993, https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD00923, 1998.
Eugster, W. and Kling, G. W.: Performance of a low-cost methane sensor for ambient concentration measurements in preliminary studies, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 1925–1934, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-1925-2012, 2012.
Fang, Y., Naik, V., Horowitz, L. W., and Mauzerall, D. L.: Air pollution and associated human mortality: the role of air pollutant emissions, climate change and methane concentration increases from the preindustrial period to present, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 1377–1394, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1377-2013, 2013.
Figaro: TGS 2600 – for the detection of air contaminants, On-line product data sheet, available at: http://www.figarosensor.com/products/2600pdf.pdf (last access: 4 October 2017), 2005.
Fiore, A. M., West, J. J., Horowitz, L. W., Naik, V., and Schwarzkopf, M. D.: Characterizing the tropospheric ozone response to methane emission controls and the benefits to climate and air quality, J. Geophys. Res., 113, 2156–2202, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009162, 2008.
Hagler, G. S. W., Yelverton T. L. B., Vedantham, R., Hansen, A. D. A., and Turner, J. R.: Post-processing method to reduce noise while preserving high time resolution in aethalometer real-time black carbon data, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 11, 539–546, https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2011.05.0055, 2011.
Halliday, H. S., Thompson, A. M., Wisthaler, A., Blake, D., Hornbrook, R. S., Mikoviny, T., Muller, M., Eicher, P., Apel, E. C., and Hills, A. J.: Atmospheric benzene observations from oil and gas production in the Denver Julesburg basin in July and August 2014, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 11055–11074, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025327, 2016.
Heimann, I., Bright, V. B., McLeod, M. W., Mead, M. I., Popoola, O. A. M., Stewart, G. B., and Jones, R. L.: Source attribution of air pollution by spatial scale separation using high spatial density networks of low cost air quality sensors, Atmos. Environ., 113, 10–19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.04.057, 2015.
Helmig, D., Thompson, C. R., Evans, J., Boylan, P., Hueber, J., and Park, J. H.: Highly elevated atmospheric levels of volatile organic compounds in the uintah basin, Utah, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 4707–4715, https://doi.org/10.1021/es405046r, 2014.
Huyberechts, G., Szeco, P., Roggen, J., and Licznerski, B. W.: Simultaneous quantification of carbon monoxide and methane in humid air using a sensor array and an artificial neural network, Sensor. Actuat. B-Chem., 45, 123–30 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4005(97)00283-9, 1997.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report, available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/syr/SYR_AR5_FINAL_full.pdf (last access: 4 October 2017), ISBN: 978-92-9169-143-2, 2015.
Karion, A., Sweeney, C., Pétron, G., Frost, G., Hardesty, R. M., Kofler, J., Miller, B. R., Newberger, T., Wolter, S., Banta, R., Brewer, A., Dlugokencky, E., Lang, P., Montzka, S. A., Schnell, R. S., Tans, P., Trainer, M., Zamora, R., and Conley, S.: Methane emissions estimate from airborne measurements over a western United States natural gas field, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 4393–4397, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50811, 2013.
Kim, J., Shusterman, A. A., Lieschke, K. J., Newman, C., and Cohen, R. C.: The BErkeley Atmospheric CO2 Observation Network: field calibration and evaluation of low-cost air quality sensors, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1937–1946, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1937-2018, 2018.
Kort, E. A., Frankenberg, C., Costigan, K. R., Lindenmaier, R., Dubey, M. K., and Wunch, D.: Four corners: the largest US methane anomaly viewed from space, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 6898–6903, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061503, 2014.
Lewis, A. C., Lee, J., Edwards, P. M., Shaw, M. D., Evans, M. J., Moller, S. J., Smith, K. R., Buckley, J. W., Ellis, M., Gillot, S. R., and White, A.: Evaluating the performance of low cost chemical sensors for air pollution research, Faraday Discuss., 189, 85–103, https://doi.org/10.1039/C5FD00201J, 2016.
Masson, N., Piedrahita, R., and Hannigan, M.: Approach for quantification of metal oxide type semiconductor gas sensors used for ambient air quality monitoring, Sensor. Actuat. B-Chem., 208, 339–345, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2014.11.032, 2015a.
Masson, N., Piedrahita, R., and Hannigan, M.: Quantification method for electrolytic sensors in long-term monitoring of ambient air quality, Sensors, 15, 27283–27302, https://doi.org/10.3390/s151027283, 2015b.
Mead, M. I., Popoola, O. A. M., Stewart, G. B., Landshoff, P., Calleja, M., Hayes, M., Baldovi, J. J., McLeod, M. W., Hodgson, T. F., Dicks, J., Lewis, A., Cohen, J., Baron, R., Saffell, J. R., and Jones, R. L.: The use of electrochemical sensors for monitoring urban air quality in low-cost, high-density networks, Atmos. Environ., 70, 186–203, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.060, 2013.
Miller, S. M., Wofsy, S. C., Michalak, A. M., Kort, E. A., Andrews, A. E., Biraud, S. C., Dlugokencky, E. J., Eluszkiewicz, J., Fischer, M. L., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Miller, B. R., Miller, J. B., Montzka, S. A., Nehrkorn, T., and Sweeney, C.: Anthropogenic emissions of methane in the United States, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 20018–20022, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1314392110, 2013.
Mobile Sensing Technology: U-Pod open-source construction and parts information, available at: http://mobilesensingtechnology.com/, last access: 4 October 2017.
Mocon, Inc – Baseline: Series 9000 Total Hydrocarbon Analyzer, available at: www.baseline-mocon.com (last access: 7 May 2018), 2017.
Moltchanov, S., Levy, I., Etzion, Y., Lerner, U., Broday, D. M., and Fishbain, B.: On the feasibility of measuring urban air pollution by wireless distributed sensor networks, Sci. Total Environ., 502, 537–547, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.09.059, 2015.
Moore, C. W., Zielinska, B., Petron, G., and Jackson, R. B.: Air impacts of increased natural gas acquisition, processing, and use: a critical review, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 8349–8359, https://doi.org/10.1021/es4053472, 2014.
Nam, E. K., Jensen, T. E., and Wallington, T. J.: Methane Emissions from Vehicles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 2005–2010, https://doi.org/10.1021/es034837g, 2004.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA): Global Greenhouse Gas Reference Network: Trends in Atmospheric Methane, available at: https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends_ch4/#global_data, last access: 4 October 2017.
Peischl, J., Ryerson T. B., Brioude, J., Aikin, K. C., Andrews, A. E., Atlas, E., Blake, D., Daube, B.C., De Gouw, J. A., Dlugokencky, E., Frost, G. J., Gentner, D. R., Gilman, J. B., Goldstein, A. H., Harley, R. A., Holloway, J. S., Kofler, J., Kuster, W. C., Lang, P. M., Novelli, P.C., Santoni, G. W., Trainer, M., Wofsy, S. S. C., and Parrish, D. D.: Quantifying sources of methane using light alkanes in the Los Angeles Basin, California, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 4974–90, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50413, 2013.
Penza, M., Suriano, D., Cassano, G., Pfister, V., Amodio, M., Trizio, L., Brattoli, M., and De Gennaro, G.: A case-study of microsensors for landfill air-pollution monitoring applications, Urban Climate, 14, 351–369, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2014.09.002, 2015.
Pétron, G., Karion, A., Sweeney, C., Miller, B. R., Montzka, S. A., Frost, G. J., Trainer, M., Tans, P., Andrews, A., Kofler, J., Helmig, D., Guenther, D., Dlugokencky, E., Lang, P., Newberger, T., Wolter, S., Hall, B., Novelli, P., Brewer, A., Conley, S., Hardesty, M., Banta, R., White, A., Noone, D., Wolfe, D., and Schnell, R.: A new look at methane and nonmethane hydrocarbon emissions from oil and natural gas operations in the Colorado Denver-Julesburg Basin, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 6836–6852, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021272, 2014.
Picarro, Inc: Picarro G2301 CRDS Analyzer CO2 CH4 H2O Measurements in Air, available at: www.picarro.com (last access: 7 May 2018), 2015.
Pfister G., Flocke, F., Hornbrook, R., Orlando, J., Lee, S., and Schroeder, J.: Final Report: Process-Based and Regional Source Impact Analysis for FRAPPÉ and DISCOVER-AQ 2014, National Center for Atmospheric Research, available at: https://www.colorado.gov/airquality/tech_doc_repository.aspx?action=open&file=FRAPPE-NCAR_Final_Report_July2017.pdf, last access: 4 November 2017.
Piedrahita, R., Xiang, Y., Masson, N., Ortega, J., Collier, A., Jiang, Y., Li, K., Dick, R. P., Lv, Q., Hannigan, M., and Shang, L.: The next generation of low-cost personal air quality sensors for quantitative exposure monitoring, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 3325–3336, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3325-2014, 2014.
Popa, M. E., Vollmer, M. K., Jordan, A., Brand, W. A., Pathirana, S. L., Rothe, M., and Röckmann, T.: Vehicle emissions of greenhouse gases and related tracers from a tunnel study: CO : CO2, N2O : CO2, CH4 : CO2, O2 : CO2 ratios, and the stable isotopes 13C and 18O in CO2 and CO, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2105–2123, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2105-2014, 2014.
Quaranta, F., Rella, R., Siciliano, P., Capone, S., Epifani, M., Vasanelli, L., Licciullic, A., and Zoccod, A.: A novel gas sensor based on SnO2/Os thin film for the detection of methane at low temperature, Sensor. Actuat. B-Chem., 58, 350–355, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4005(99)00095-7, 1999.
Sadd, J. and Shamasunder, B.: Oil extraction in Los Angeles: health, land use, and environmental justice consequences, from the Drilling Down Report, by the Liberty Hill Foundation, available at: https://www.libertyhill.org/sites/libertyhillfoundation/files/Drilling Down Report_1.pdf (last access: 4 October 2017), 2015.
Sadighi, K., Coffey, E., Polidori, A., Feenstra, B., Lv, Q., Henze, D. K., and Hannigan, M.: Intra-urban spatial variability of surface ozone in Riverside, CA: viability and validation of low-cost sensors, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1777–1792, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1777-2018, 2018.
Shamasunder, B., Collier-Oxandale, A., Blickley, J., Sadd, J., Chan, M., Navarro, S., Hannigan, M., and Wong, N. J.: Community-based health and exposure study around urban oil developments in south Los Angeles, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 15, 1, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15010138, 2018.
Snyder, E. G., Watkins, T. H., Solomon, P. A., Thoma, E. D., Williams, R. W., Hagler, G. S. W., Shelow, D., Hindin D. A., Kilaru, V. J., and Preuss, P. W.: The changing paradigm of air pollution monitoring, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 11369–11377 https://doi.org/10.1021/es4022602, 2013.
Spinelle, L., Gerboles, M., Villani, M. G., Aleixandre, M., and Bonavitacola, F.: Field calibration of a cluster of low-cost available sensors for air quality monitoring. part A: ozone and nitrogen dioxide, Sensor. Actuat. B-Chem., 215, 249–257, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2015.03.031, 2015.
Spinelle, L., Gerboles, M., Villani, M. G., Aleixandre, M., and Bonavitacola, F.: Field calibration of a cluster of low-cost commercially available sensors for air quality monitoring. part B: NO, CO and CO2, Sensor. Actuat. B-Chem., 238, 706–715, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2016.07.036, 2017.
Subramanian, R., Williams, L. L., Vaughn, T. L., Zimmerle, D., Roscioli, J. R., Herndon, S. C., Yacovitch, T. I., Floerchinger, C., Tkacik, D. S., Mitchell, A. L., Sullivan, M. R., Dallman, T. R., and Robinson, A. L.: Methane emissions from natural gas compressor stations in the transmission and storage sector: measurements and comparisons with the EPA greenhouse gas reporting program protocol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 3252–3261, https://doi.org/10.1021/es5060258, 2015.
Sun, Y. F., Liu, S. B., Meng, F. L., Liu, J. Y., Jin, Z., Kong, L. T., and Liu, J. H.: Metal oxide nanostructures and their gas sensing properties: a review, Sensors 12, 2610–2631, https://doi.org/10.3390/s120302610, 2012.
Thompson, C. R., Hueber, J., and Helmig, D.: Influence of oil and gas emissions on ambient atmospheric non-methane hydrocarbons in residential areas of Northeastern Colorado, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 3, 35, https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000035, 2014.
United States Energy Information Administration (US EIA): Top 100 oil fields, available at: https://www.eia.gov/naturalgas/crudeoilreserves/top100/pdf/top100.pdf (last access: 4 October 2017), 2015.
United States Energy Information Administration (US EIA): States Profiles and Energy Estimates, Colorado, available at: https://www.eia.gov/state/analysis.php?sid=CO (last access: 4 October 2017), 2016a.
United States Energy Information Administration (US EIA): States Profiles and Energy Estimates, California, available at: https://www.eia.gov/state/analysis.php?sid=CA (last access: 4 October 2017), 2016b.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA): Technical Note – Reporting Negative Values for Criteria Pollutant Gaseous Monitors to AQS, available at: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2017-02/documents/negative_values_reporting_to_aqs_10_6_16.pdf (last access: 15 April 2018), 2016.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA): Overview of greenhouse gases: methane, available at: https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases#CH4 reference, last access: 4 October 2017.
Van den Bossche, M., Rose, N. T., and De Wekker, S. F. J.: Potential of a low-cost gas sensor for atmospheric methane monitoring, Sensor. Actuat. B-Chem., 238, 501–509, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2016.07.092, 2017.
Wang, C., Yin, L., Zhang, L., Xiang, D., and Gao, R.: Metal oxide gas sensors: sensitivity and influencing factors, Sensors, 10, 2088–2106, https://doi.org/10.3390/s100302088, 2010.
West, J. J., Arlene, F. M., Horowitz, L. W., and Mauzerall, D. L.: Global health benefits of mitigating ozone pollution with methane emission controls, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 103, 3988–3993, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0600201103, 2006.
Wilcox, J., Gopstein, A. M., Arent, D., Wofsy, S., Brown, N. J., Bradley, R., and Stucky, G. D.: Methane leaks from north american natural gas systems, Science, 343, 733–735, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1247045, 2014.
Wong, K. W., Fu, D., Pongetti, T. J., Newman, S., Kort, E. A., Duren, R., Hsu, Y.-K., Miller, C. E., Yung, Y. L., and Sander, S. P.: Mapping CH4 : CO2 ratios in Los Angeles with CLARS-FTS from Mount Wilson, California, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 241–252, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-241-2015, 2015.
Yacovitch T. I., Herndon, S. C., Pétron, G., Kofler, J., Lyon, D., Zahniser, M. S., and Kolb C. E.: Mobile laboratory observations of methane emissions in the barnett shale region, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 7889–7895, https://doi.org/10.1021/es506352j, 2015.
Zavala-araiza, D., Lyon, D. R., Alvarez, R. A., Davis, K. J., Harriss, R., Herndon, S. C., Karion, A., Kort, E. A., Lamb, B. K., Lan, X. Marchese, A. J., Pacala, S. W., Robinson A. L., Shepson, P. B., Sweeny, C., Talbot, R., Townsend-Small, A., Yacovitch, T. I., Zimmerle D. J., and Hamburg, S. P.: Reconciling divergent estimates of oil and gas methane emissions, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 112, 15597–15602, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1522126112, 2015.
Zimmerman, N., Presto, A. A., Kumar, S. P. N., Gu, J., Hauryliuk, A., Robinson, E. S., Robinson, A. L., and R. Subramanian: A machine learning calibration model using random forests to improve sensor performance for lower-cost air quality monitoring, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 291–313, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-291-2018, 2018.
Zhang, Z., Tong, J., Chen, D., and Yu-bin Lan, Y.: Electronic nose with an air sensor matrix for detecting beef freshness, J. Bionic Eng., 5, 67–73, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(08)60008-6, 2008.
Short summary
Low-cost air quality sensors and air quality sensor systems have the potential to open up new ways of measuring pollutants. In this paper, we explored ways to use low-cost sensors (approximately USD 10 per sensor) to estimate methane – a pollutant important for its contributions to climate change. We found that while these sensors will likely never replace traditional air quality monitoring methods, they can provide useful supplementary information on local pollution sources and regional trends.
Low-cost air quality sensors and air quality sensor systems have the potential to open up new...
