Articles | Volume 12, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-129-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-129-2019
Research article
 | 
10 Jan 2019
Research article |  | 10 Jan 2019

Evaluation of version 3.0B of the BEHR OMI NO2 product

Joshua L. Laughner, Qindan Zhu, and Ronald C. Cohen

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Josh Laughner on behalf of the Authors (11 Nov 2018)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (22 Nov 2018) by Jun Wang
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (03 Dec 2018)
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (11 Dec 2018)
ED: Publish as is (12 Dec 2018) by Jun Wang
Download
Short summary
We compared v3.0B of the BEHR satellite NO2 product against independent measurements to verify its accuracy. We found that the BEHR product generally performs better than standard NO2 products and the previous version of BEHR. Outside of the SE US, using daily NO2 profiles results in similar or better agreement with independent measurements than using monthly profiles, and direct evaluation of those profiles shows they better describe NO2 distribution in urban areas than monthly profiles.