Articles | Volume 12, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-4421-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-4421-2019
Research article
 | 
19 Aug 2019
Research article |  | 19 Aug 2019

3+2 + X: what is the most useful depolarization input for retrieving microphysical properties of non-spherical particles from lidar measurements using the spheroid model of Dubovik et al. (2006)?

Matthias Tesche, Alexei Kolgotin, Moritz Haarig, Sharon P. Burton, Richard A. Ferrare, Chris A. Hostetler, and Detlef Müller

Viewed

Total article views: 2,299 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,355 893 51 2,299 50 61
  • HTML: 1,355
  • PDF: 893
  • XML: 51
  • Total: 2,299
  • BibTeX: 50
  • EndNote: 61
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Mar 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 20 Mar 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,299 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,982 with geography defined and 317 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 24 Feb 2024
Download
Short summary
Today, few lidar are capable of triple-wavelength particle linear depolarization ratio (PLDR) measurements. This study is the first systematic investigation of the effect of different choices of PLDR input on the inversion of lidar measurements of mineral dust and dusty mixtures using light scattering by randomly oriented spheroids. We provide recommendations of the most suitable input parameters for use with the applied methodology, based on a relational assessment of the inversion output.