Articles | Volume 12, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-4421-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-4421-2019
Research article
 | 
19 Aug 2019
Research article |  | 19 Aug 2019

3+2 + X: what is the most useful depolarization input for retrieving microphysical properties of non-spherical particles from lidar measurements using the spheroid model of Dubovik et al. (2006)?

Matthias Tesche, Alexei Kolgotin, Moritz Haarig, Sharon P. Burton, Richard A. Ferrare, Chris A. Hostetler, and Detlef Müller

Related authors

Multi-section reference value for the analysis of horizontally scanning aerosol lidar observations
Juseon Shin, Gahyeong Kim, Dukhyeon Kim, Matthias Tesche, Gahyeon Park, and Youngmin Noh
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 397–406, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-397-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-397-2024, 2024
Short summary
A cloud-by-cloud approach for studying aerosol-cloud interaction in satellite observations
Fani Alexandri, Felix Müller, Goutam Choudhury, Peggy Achtert, Torsten Seelig, and Matthias Tesche
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2773,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2773, 2023
Short summary
A first global height-resolved cloud condensation nuclei data set derived from spaceborne lidar measurements
Goutam Choudhury and Matthias Tesche
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 3747–3760, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3747-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3747-2023, 2023
Short summary
TrackMatcher – a tool for finding intercepts in tracks of geographical positions
Peter Bräuer and Matthias Tesche
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7557–7572, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7557-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7557-2022, 2022
Short summary
Locations for the best lidar view of mid-level and high clouds
Matthias Tesche and Vincent Noel
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4225–4240, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4225-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4225-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Derivation of depolarization ratios of aerosol fluorescence and water vapor Raman backscatters from lidar measurements
Igor Veselovskii, Qiaoyun Hu, Philippe Goloub, Thierry Podvin, William Boissiere, Mikhail Korenskiy, Nikita Kasianik, Sergey Khaykyn, and Robin Miri
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1023–1036, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1023-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1023-2024, 2024
Short summary
Long-term aerosol particle depolarization ratio measurements with HALO Photonics Doppler lidar
Viet Le, Hannah Lobo, Ewan J. O'Connor, and Ville Vakkari
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 921–941, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-921-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-921-2024, 2024
Short summary
HETEAC-Flex: an optimal estimation method for aerosol typing based on lidar-derived intensive optical properties
Athena Augusta Floutsi, Holger Baars, and Ulla Wandinger
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 693–714, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-693-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-693-2024, 2024
Short summary
MAGARA: a Multi-Angle Geostationary Aerosol Retrieval Algorithm
James A. Limbacher, Ralph A. Kahn, Mariel D. Friberg, Jaehwa Lee, Tyler Summers, and Hai Zhang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 471–498, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-471-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-471-2024, 2024
Short summary
Multi-section reference value for the analysis of horizontally scanning aerosol lidar observations
Juseon Shin, Gahyeong Kim, Dukhyeon Kim, Matthias Tesche, Gahyeon Park, and Youngmin Noh
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 397–406, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-397-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-397-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Ansmann, A. and Müller, D.: Lidar and atmospheric aerosol particles, in: LIDAR–Range-resolved optical remote sensing of the atmosphere, edited by: Weitkamp, C., 105–141, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2005. a, b, c
Baars, H., Kanitz, T., Engelmann, R., Althausen, D., Heese, B., Komppula, M., Preißler, J., Tesche, M., Ansmann, A., Wandinger, U., Lim, J.-H., Ahn, J. Y., Stachlewska, I. S., Amiridis, V., Marinou, E., Seifert, P., Hofer, J., Skupin, A., Schneider, F., Bohlmann, S., Foth, A., Bley, S., Pfüller, A., Giannakaki, E., Lihavainen, H., Viisanen, Y., Hooda, R. K., Pereira, S. N., Bortoli, D., Wagner, F., Mattis, I., Janicka, L., Markowicz, K. M., Achtert, P., Artaxo, P., Pauliquevis, T., Souza, R. A. F., Sharma, V. P., van Zyl, P. G., Beukes, J. P., Sun, J., Rohwer, E. G., Deng, R., Mamouri, R.-E., and Zamorano, F.: An overview of the first decade of PollyNET: an emerging network of automated Raman-polarization lidars for continuous aerosol profiling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5111–5137, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5111-2016, 2016. a
Bi, L., Lin, W., Liu, D., and Zhang, K.: Assessing the depolarization capabilities of nonspherical particles in a super-ellipsoidal shape space, Opt. Express, 26, 1726-1742, https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.001726, 2018. a, b
Burton, S. P., Ferrare, R. A., Hostetler, C. A., Hair, J. W., Rogers, R. R., Obland, M. D., Butler, C. F., Cook, A. L., Harper, D. B., and Froyd, K. D.: Aerosol classification using airborne High Spectral Resolution Lidar measurements – methodology and examples, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 73–98, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-73-2012, 2012. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i
Burton, S. P., Vaughan, M. A., Ferrare, R. A., and Hostetler, C. A.: Separating mixtures of aerosol types in airborne High Spectral Resolution Lidar data, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 419–436, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-419-2014, 2014. a, b, c, d, e
Download
Short summary
Today, few lidar are capable of triple-wavelength particle linear depolarization ratio (PLDR) measurements. This study is the first systematic investigation of the effect of different choices of PLDR input on the inversion of lidar measurements of mineral dust and dusty mixtures using light scattering by randomly oriented spheroids. We provide recommendations of the most suitable input parameters for use with the applied methodology, based on a relational assessment of the inversion output.