Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
AMT
Articles | Volume 13, issue 4
Articles | Volume 13, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2099-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2099-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 13, issue 4
Research article
 | 
23 Apr 2020
Research article |  | 23 Apr 2020

Shallow cumuli cover and its uncertainties from ground-based lidar–radar data and sky images

Erin A. Riley, Jessica M. Kleiss, Laura D. Riihimaki, Charles N. Long, Larry K. Berg, and Evgueni Kassianov

Viewed

Total article views: 2,852 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,042 732 78 2,852 67 68
  • HTML: 2,042
  • PDF: 732
  • XML: 78
  • Total: 2,852
  • BibTeX: 67
  • EndNote: 68
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Jun 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Jun 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,852 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,447 with geography defined and 405 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 16 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
Discrepancies in hourly shallow cumuli cover estimates can be substantial. Instrument detection differences contribute to long-term bias in shallow cumuli cover estimates, whereas narrow field-of-view configurations impact measurement uncertainty as averaging time decreases. A new tool is introduced to visually assess both impacts on sub-hourly cloud cover estimates. Accurate shallow cumuli cover estimation is needed for model–observation comparisons and studying cloud-surface interactions.
Read more