Articles | Volume 13, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2099-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2099-2020
Research article
 | 
23 Apr 2020
Research article |  | 23 Apr 2020

Shallow cumuli cover and its uncertainties from ground-based lidar–radar data and sky images

Erin A. Riley, Jessica M. Kleiss, Laura D. Riihimaki, Charles N. Long, Larry K. Berg, and Evgueni Kassianov

Related authors

Evaluation of the hyperspectral radiometer (HSR1) at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Southern Great Plains (SGP) site
Kelly A. Balmes, Laura D. Riihimaki, John Wood, Connor Flynn, Adam Theisen, Michael Ritsche, Lynn Ma, Gary B. Hodges, and Christian Herrera
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3783–3807, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3783-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3783-2024, 2024
Short summary
Evaluating the potential of short-term instrument deployment to improve distributed wind resource assessment
Lindsay M. Sheridan, Dmitry Duplyakin, Caleb Phillips, Heidi Tinnesand, Raj K. Rai, Julia E. Flaherty, and Larry K. Berg
Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-37,https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2024-37, 2024
Preprint under review for WES
Short summary
Shortwave Array Spectroradiometer-Hemispheric (SAS-He): Design and Evaluation
Evgueni Kassianov, Connor Flynn, James Barnard, Brian Ermold, and Jennifer Comstock
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-13,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-13, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary
Tracking precipitation features and associated large-scale environments over southeastern Texas
Ye Liu, Yun Qian, Larry K. Berg, Zhe Feng, Jianfeng Li, Jingyi Chen, and Zhao Yang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-112,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-112, 2024
Short summary
Year-long buoy-based observations of the air–sea transition zone off the US west coast
Raghavendra Krishnamurthy, Gabriel García Medina, Brian Gaudet, William I. Gustafson Jr., Evgueni I. Kassianov, Jinliang Liu, Rob K. Newsom, Lindsay M. Sheridan, and Alicia M. Mahon
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5667–5699, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5667-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5667-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Synergistic approach of frozen hydrometeor retrievals: considerations on radiative transfer and model uncertainties in a simulated framework
Ethel Villeneuve, Philippe Chambon, and Nadia Fourrié
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3567–3582, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3567-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3567-2024, 2024
Short summary
An evaluation of microphysics in a numerical model using Doppler velocity measured by ground-based radar for application to the EarthCARE satellite
Woosub Roh, Masaki Satoh, Yuichiro Hagihara, Hiroaki Horie, Yuichi Ohno, and Takuji Kubota
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3455–3466, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3455-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3455-2024, 2024
Short summary
Investigation of cirrus cloud properties in the tropical tropopause layer using high-altitude limb-scanning near-IR spectroscopy during NASA-ATTREX
Santo Fedele Colosimo, Nathaniel Brockway, Vijay Natraj, Robert Spurr, Klaus Pfeilsticker, Lisa Scalone, Max Spolaor, Sarah Woods, and Jochen Stutz
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2367–2385, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2367-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2367-2024, 2024
Short summary
Comparing FY-2F/CTA products to ground-based manual total cloud cover observations in Xinjiang under complex underlying surfaces and different weather conditions
Shuai Li, Hua Zhang, Yonghang Chen, Zhili Wang, Xiangyu Li, Yuan Li, and Yuanyuan Xue
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2011–2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2011-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2011-2024, 2024
Short summary
Model-based evaluation of cloud geometry and droplet size retrievals from two-dimensional polarized measurements of specMACS
Lea Volkmer, Veronika Pörtge, Fabian Jakub, and Bernhard Mayer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1703–1719, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1703-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1703-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Angevine, W. M., Olson, J., Kenyon, J., Gustafson, W. I., Endo, S., Suselj, K., and Turner, D. D.: Shallow Cumulus in WRF Parameterizations Evaluated against LASSO Large-Eddy Simulations, Mon. Weather Rev., 146, 4303–4322, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0115.1, 2018. 
Arakawa, A.: The Cumulus Parameterization Problem: Past, Present, and Future, J. Climate, 17, 2493–2525, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<2493:RATCPP>2.0.CO;2, 2004. 
ARM: ARM Best Estimate Data Pproducts (ARMBE) at Southern Great Plains (SGP) Central Facility, Lamont, OK (C1), Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility, available at: https://www.arm.gov/capabilities/vaps/armbe (last access: 25 February 2019), 1994. 
Astin, I., Girolamo, L. D., and van de Poll, H. M.: Bayesian confidence intervals for true fractional coverage from finite transect measurements: Implications for cloud studies from space, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 17303–17310, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD900168, 2001. 
Atkinson, B. W. and Zhang, J. W.: Mesoscale shallow convection in the atmosphere, Rev. Geophys., 34, 403–431, https://doi.org/10.1029/96RG02623, 1996. 
Download
Short summary
Discrepancies in hourly shallow cumuli cover estimates can be substantial. Instrument detection differences contribute to long-term bias in shallow cumuli cover estimates, whereas narrow field-of-view configurations impact measurement uncertainty as averaging time decreases. A new tool is introduced to visually assess both impacts on sub-hourly cloud cover estimates. Accurate shallow cumuli cover estimation is needed for model–observation comparisons and studying cloud-surface interactions.