Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
AMT
Articles | Volume 13, issue 1
Articles | Volume 13, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-341-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-341-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 13, issue 1
Research article
 | 
31 Jan 2020
Research article |  | 31 Jan 2020

Constraining the accuracy of flux estimates using OTM 33A

Rachel Edie, Anna M. Robertson, Robert A. Field, Jeffrey Soltis, Dustin A. Snare, Daniel Zimmerle, Clay S. Bell, Timothy L. Vaughn, and Shane M. Murphy

Viewed

Total article views: 4,413 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,886 1,425 102 4,413 414 110 142
  • HTML: 2,886
  • PDF: 1,425
  • XML: 102
  • Total: 4,413
  • Supplement: 414
  • BibTeX: 110
  • EndNote: 142
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Aug 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Aug 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,413 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,165 with geography defined and 248 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 26 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
Ground-based measurements of emissions from oil and natural gas production are important for understanding emission distributions and improving emission inventories. Here, measurement technique Other Test Method 33A (OTM 33A) is validated through several test releases staged at the Methane Emissions Technology Evaluation Center. These tests suggest OTM 33A has no inherent bias and that a group of OTM measurements is within 5 % of the known mean emission rate.
Read more
Share