Articles | Volume 13, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-341-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-341-2020
Research article
 | 
31 Jan 2020
Research article |  | 31 Jan 2020

Constraining the accuracy of flux estimates using OTM 33A

Rachel Edie, Anna M. Robertson, Robert A. Field, Jeffrey Soltis, Dustin A. Snare, Daniel Zimmerle, Clay S. Bell, Timothy L. Vaughn, and Shane M. Murphy

Viewed

Total article views: 2,866 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,787 1,030 49 2,866 309 49 54
  • HTML: 1,787
  • PDF: 1,030
  • XML: 49
  • Total: 2,866
  • Supplement: 309
  • BibTeX: 49
  • EndNote: 54
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Aug 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Aug 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,866 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,650 with geography defined and 216 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 01 Mar 2024
Download
Short summary
Ground-based measurements of emissions from oil and natural gas production are important for understanding emission distributions and improving emission inventories. Here, measurement technique Other Test Method 33A (OTM 33A) is validated through several test releases staged at the Methane Emissions Technology Evaluation Center. These tests suggest OTM 33A has no inherent bias and that a group of OTM measurements is within 5 % of the known mean emission rate.