Articles | Volume 13, issue 1
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 341–353, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-341-2020
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 341–353, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-341-2020

Research article 31 Jan 2020

Research article | 31 Jan 2020

Constraining the accuracy of flux estimates using OTM 33A

Rachel Edie et al.

Related authors

A novel approach to calibrating a photoacoustic absorption spectrometer using polydisperse absorbing aerosol
Katie Foster, Rudra Pokhrel, Matthew Burkhart, and Shane Murphy
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 3351–3363, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-3351-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-3351-2019, 2019
Short summary
Radiative effect and climate impacts of brown carbon with the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM5)
Hunter Brown, Xiaohong Liu, Yan Feng, Yiquan Jiang, Mingxuan Wu, Zheng Lu, Chenglai Wu, Shane Murphy, and Rudra Pokhrel
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17745–17768, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17745-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17745-2018, 2018
Short summary
Relative importance of black carbon, brown carbon, and absorption enhancement from clear coatings in biomass burning emissions
Rudra P. Pokhrel, Eric R. Beamesderfer, Nick L. Wagner, Justin M. Langridge, Daniel A. Lack, Thilina Jayarathne, Elizabeth A. Stone, Chelsea E. Stockwell, Robert J. Yokelson, and Shane M. Murphy
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 5063–5078, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5063-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5063-2017, 2017
Short summary
Parameterization of single-scattering albedo (SSA) and absorption Ångström exponent (AAE) with EC / OC for aerosol emissions from biomass burning
Rudra P. Pokhrel, Nick L. Wagner, Justin M. Langridge, Daniel A. Lack, Thilina Jayarathne, Elizabeth A. Stone, Chelsea E. Stockwell, Robert J. Yokelson, and Shane M. Murphy
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 9549–9561, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9549-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9549-2016, 2016
Short summary
Measurements of methane emissions from natural gas gathering facilities and processing plants: measurement methods
J. R. Roscioli, T. I. Yacovitch, C. Floerchinger, A. L. Mitchell, D. S. Tkacik, R. Subramanian, D. M. Martinez, T. L. Vaughn, L. Williams, D. Zimmerle, A. L. Robinson, S. C. Herndon, and A. J. Marchese
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 2017–2035, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2017-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2017-2015, 2015
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Robust statistical calibration and characterization of portable low-cost air quality monitoring sensors to quantify real-time O3 and NO2 concentrations in diverse environments
Ravi Sahu, Ayush Nagal, Kuldeep Kumar Dixit, Harshavardhan Unnibhavi, Srikanth Mantravadi, Srijith Nair, Yogesh Simmhan, Brijesh Mishra, Rajesh Zele, Ronak Sutaria, Vidyanand Motiram Motghare, Purushottam Kar, and Sachchida Nand Tripathi
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 37–52, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-37-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-37-2021, 2021
Short summary
A miniature Portable Emissions Measurement System (PEMS) for real-driving monitoring of motorcycles
Michal Vojtisek-Lom, Alessandro A. Zardini, Martin Pechout, Lubos Dittrich, Fausto Forni, François Montigny, Massimo Carriero, Barouch Giechaskiel, and Giorgio Martini
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 5827–5843, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-5827-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-5827-2020, 2020
Short summary
Performance of open-path GasFinder3 devices for CH4 concentration measurements close to ambient levels
Christoph Häni, Marcel Bühler, Albrecht Neftel, Christof Ammann, and Thomas Kupper
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2020-326,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2020-326, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Water vapor density and turbulent fluxes from three generations of infrared gas analyzers
Seth Kutikoff, Xiaomao Lin, Steven R. Evett, Prasanna Gowda, David Brauer, Jed Moorhead, Gary Marek, Paul Colaizzi, Robert Aiken, Liukang Xu, and Clenton Owensby
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2020-302,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2020-302, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary
Quantifying fugitive gas emissions from an oil sands tailings pond with open-path FTIR measurements
Yuan You, Samar G. Moussa, Lucas Zhang, Long Fu, James Beck, and Ralf M. Staebler
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2020-257,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2020-257, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary

Cited articles

Allen, D. T.: Emissions from oil and gas operations in the United States and their air quality implications, J. Air Waste Manage., 66, 549–575, 2016. a
Alvarez, R. A., Pacala, S. W., Winebrake, J. J., Chameides, W. L., and Hamburg, S. P.: Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 6435–6440, 2012. a
Alvarez, R. A., Zavala-Araiza, D., Lyon, D. R., Allen, D. T., Barkley, Z. R., Brandt, A. R., Davis, K. J., Herndon, S. C., Jacob, D. J., Karion, A., Kort, E. A., Lamb, B. K., Lauvaux, T., Maasakkers, J. D., Marchese, A. J., Omara, M., Pacala, S. W., Peischl, J., Robinson, A. L., Shepson, P. B., Sweeney, C., Townsend-Small, A., Wofsy, S. C., and Hamburg, S. P.: Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain, Science, 2, 7204–9, 2018. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h
Bell, C., Vaughn, T., Zimmerle, D., Herndon, S., Yacovitch, T., Heath, G., Pétron, G., Edie, R., Field, R., Murphy, S., Robertson, A., and Soltis, J.: Comparison of methane emission estimates from multiple measurement techniques at natural gas production pads, Elem. Sci. Anth., 5, 1–14, 2017. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p
Brandt, A. R., Heath, G. A., Kort, E. A., O'Sullivan, F., Pétron, G., Jordaan, S. M., Tans, P., Wilcox, J., Gopstein, A. M., Arent, D., Wofsy, S., Brown, N. J., Bradley, R., Stucky, G. D., Eardley, D., and Harriss, R.: Methane Leaks from North American Natural Gas Systems, Science, 343, 733–735, 2014. a, b
Download
Short summary
Ground-based measurements of emissions from oil and natural gas production are important for understanding emission distributions and improving emission inventories. Here, measurement technique Other Test Method 33A (OTM 33A) is validated through several test releases staged at the Methane Emissions Technology Evaluation Center. These tests suggest OTM 33A has no inherent bias and that a group of OTM measurements is within 5 % of the known mean emission rate.