Articles | Volume 13, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-969-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-969-2020
Research article
 | 
02 Mar 2020
Research article |  | 02 Mar 2020

Comparison of turbulence measurements by a CSAT3B sonic anemometer and a high-resolution bistatic Doppler lidar

Matthias Mauder, Michael Eggert, Christian Gutsmuths, Stefan Oertel, Paul Wilhelm, Ingo Voelksch, Luise Wanner, Jens Tambke, and Ivan Bogoev

Viewed

Total article views: 5,457 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
3,638 1,621 198 5,457 205 245
  • HTML: 3,638
  • PDF: 1,621
  • XML: 198
  • Total: 5,457
  • BibTeX: 205
  • EndNote: 245
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 May 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 May 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 5,457 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 5,012 with geography defined and 445 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 28 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
Sonic anemometers are prone to probe-induced flow distortion effects. Here, we present the results of an intercomparison experiment between a CSAT3B sonic anemometer and a high-resolution bistatic Doppler lidar, which is inherently free of flow distortion. Our results show an agreement of the mean wind velocity measurements and the standard deviations of the vertical wind speed with comparabilities of 0.082 and 0.020 m s−1, respectively. Friction velocity is underestimated by the CSAT3B by 3 %.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint