Articles | Volume 13, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-969-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-969-2020
Research article
 | 
02 Mar 2020
Research article |  | 02 Mar 2020

Comparison of turbulence measurements by a CSAT3B sonic anemometer and a high-resolution bistatic Doppler lidar

Matthias Mauder, Michael Eggert, Christian Gutsmuths, Stefan Oertel, Paul Wilhelm, Ingo Voelksch, Luise Wanner, Jens Tambke, and Ivan Bogoev

Related authors

The ATMONSYS water vapor DIAL: Advanced measurements of short-term variability in the planetary boundary layer
Johannes Speidel, Hannes Vogelmann, Andreas Behrendt, Diego Lange, Matthias Mauder, Jens Reichardt, and Kevin Wolz
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-168,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-168, 2024
Preprint under review for AMT
Short summary
Comparing triple and single Doppler lidar wind measurements with sonic anemometer data based on a new filter strategy for virtual tower measurements
Kevin Wolz, Christopher Holst, Frank Beyrich, Eileen Päschke, and Matthias Mauder
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 205–223, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-205-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-205-2024, 2024
Short summary
Intercomparison of eddy-covariance software for urban tall-tower sites
Changxing Lan, Matthias Mauder, Stavros Stagakis, Benjamin Loubet, Claudio D'Onofrio, Stefan Metzger, David Durden, and Pedro-Henrique Herig-Coimbra
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2649–2669, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2649-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2649-2024, 2024
Short summary
Interpretability of negative latent heat fluxes from eddy covariance measurements in dry conditions
Sinikka J. Paulus, Rene Orth, Sung-Ching Lee, Anke Hildebrandt, Martin Jung, Jacob A. Nelson, Tarek Sebastian El-Madany, Arnaud Carrara, Gerardo Moreno, Matthias Mauder, Jannis Groh, Alexander Graf, Markus Reichstein, and Mirco Migliavacca
Biogeosciences, 21, 2051–2085, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2051-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2051-2024, 2024
Short summary
Coupled large eddy simulations of land surface heterogeneity effects and diurnal evolution of late summer and early autumn atmospheric boundary layers during the CHEESEHEAD19 field campaign
Sreenath Paleri, Luise Wanner, Matthias Sühring, Ankur Desai, and Matthias Mauder
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1721,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1721, 2023
Preprint archived
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Others (Wind, Precipitation, Temperature, etc.) | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Assessing the ducting phenomenon and its potential impact on Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) radio occultation refractivity retrievals over the northeast Pacific Ocean using radiosondes and global reanalysis
Thomas E. Winning Jr., Feiqin Xie, and Kevin J. Nelson
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6851–6863, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6851-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6851-2024, 2024
Short summary
Time-resolved measurements of the densities of individual frozen hydrometeors and fresh snowfall
Dhiraj K. Singh, Eric R. Pardyjak, and Timothy J. Garrett
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4581–4598, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4581-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4581-2024, 2024
Short summary
Uncertainties in temperature statistics and fluxes determined by sonic anemometers due to wind-induced vibrations of mounting arms
Zhongming Gao, Heping Liu, Dan Li, Bai Yang, Von Walden, Lei Li, and Ivan Bogoev
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4109–4120, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4109-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4109-2024, 2024
Short summary
Performance evaluation of MeteoTracker mobile sensor for outdoor applications
Francesco Barbano, Erika Brattich, Carlo Cintolesi, Abdul Ghafoor Nizamani, Silvana Di Sabatino, Massimo Milelli, Esther E. M. Peerlings, Sjoerd Polder, Gert-Jan Steeneveld, and Antonio Parodi
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3255–3278, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3255-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3255-2024, 2024
Short summary
Impacts of anemometer changes, site relocations and processing methods on wind speed trends in China
Yi Liu, Lihong Zhou, Yingzuo Qin, Cesar Azorin-Molina, Cheng Shen, Rongrong Xu, and Zhenzhong Zeng
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1123–1131, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1123-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1123-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., and Papale, D. (eds.): Eddy Covariance – A Practical Guide to Measurement and Data Analysis, Springer, Dordrecht, 2012. 
Bingöl, F., Mann, J., and Foussekis, D.: Conically scanning lidar error in complex terrain, Meteorol. Z., 18, 189–195, https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2009/0368, 2009. 
Bradley, S.: Wind speed errors for LIDARs and SODARs in complex terrain, IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., 1, 012061, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1307/1/1/012061, 2008. 
Brugger, P., Träumner, K., and Jung, C.: Evaluation of a procedure to correct spatial averaging in turbulence statistics from a doppler lidar by comparing time series with an ultrasonic anemometer, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 33, 2135–2144, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-15-0136.1, 2016. 
Download
Short summary
Sonic anemometers are prone to probe-induced flow distortion effects. Here, we present the results of an intercomparison experiment between a CSAT3B sonic anemometer and a high-resolution bistatic Doppler lidar, which is inherently free of flow distortion. Our results show an agreement of the mean wind velocity measurements and the standard deviations of the vertical wind speed with comparabilities of 0.082 and 0.020 m s−1, respectively. Friction velocity is underestimated by the CSAT3B by 3 %.