Articles | Volume 13, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-969-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-969-2020
Research article
 | 
02 Mar 2020
Research article |  | 02 Mar 2020

Comparison of turbulence measurements by a CSAT3B sonic anemometer and a high-resolution bistatic Doppler lidar

Matthias Mauder, Michael Eggert, Christian Gutsmuths, Stefan Oertel, Paul Wilhelm, Ingo Voelksch, Luise Wanner, Jens Tambke, and Ivan Bogoev

Related authors

An extension of the BROOK90 hydrological model for estimation of subdaily water and energy fluxes
Rico Kronenberg, Ivan Vorobevskii, Thi Thanh Luong, Uwe Spank, Dongkyun Kim, and Matthias Mauder
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2084,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2084, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Quantifying evaporation of intercepted rainfall: a hybrid correction approach for eddy-covariance measurements
Stefanie Fischer, Ronald Queck, Christian Bernhofer, and Matthias Mauder
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2118,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2118, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
The ATMONSYS water vapor DIAL: Advanced measurements of short-term variability in the planetary boundary layer
Johannes Speidel, Hannes Vogelmann, Andreas Behrendt, Diego Lange, Matthias Mauder, Jens Reichardt, and Kevin Wolz
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-168,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-168, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary
Comparing triple and single Doppler lidar wind measurements with sonic anemometer data based on a new filter strategy for virtual tower measurements
Kevin Wolz, Christopher Holst, Frank Beyrich, Eileen Päschke, and Matthias Mauder
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 205–223, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-205-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-205-2024, 2024
Short summary
Intercomparison of eddy-covariance software for urban tall-tower sites
Changxing Lan, Matthias Mauder, Stavros Stagakis, Benjamin Loubet, Claudio D'Onofrio, Stefan Metzger, David Durden, and Pedro-Henrique Herig-Coimbra
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2649–2669, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2649-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2649-2024, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Others (Wind, Precipitation, Temperature, etc.) | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Assessing the ducting phenomenon and its potential impact on Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) radio occultation refractivity retrievals over the northeast Pacific Ocean using radiosondes and global reanalysis
Thomas E. Winning Jr., Feiqin Xie, and Kevin J. Nelson
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6851–6863, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6851-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6851-2024, 2024
Short summary
Time-resolved measurements of the densities of individual frozen hydrometeors and fresh snowfall
Dhiraj K. Singh, Eric R. Pardyjak, and Timothy J. Garrett
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4581–4598, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4581-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4581-2024, 2024
Short summary
Uncertainties in temperature statistics and fluxes determined by sonic anemometers due to wind-induced vibrations of mounting arms
Zhongming Gao, Heping Liu, Dan Li, Bai Yang, Von Walden, Lei Li, and Ivan Bogoev
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4109–4120, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4109-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4109-2024, 2024
Short summary
Development and Comparison of Empirical Models for All-sky Downward Longwave Radiation Estimation at the Ocean Surface Using Long-term Observations
Jianghai Peng, Bo Jiang, Hui Liang, Shaopeng Li, Jiakun Han, Thomas C. Ingalls, Jie Cheng, Yunjun Yao, Kun Jia, and Xiaotong Zhang
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-85,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-85, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary
Performance evaluation of MeteoTracker mobile sensor for outdoor applications
Francesco Barbano, Erika Brattich, Carlo Cintolesi, Abdul Ghafoor Nizamani, Silvana Di Sabatino, Massimo Milelli, Esther E. M. Peerlings, Sjoerd Polder, Gert-Jan Steeneveld, and Antonio Parodi
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3255–3278, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3255-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3255-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., and Papale, D. (eds.): Eddy Covariance – A Practical Guide to Measurement and Data Analysis, Springer, Dordrecht, 2012. 
Bingöl, F., Mann, J., and Foussekis, D.: Conically scanning lidar error in complex terrain, Meteorol. Z., 18, 189–195, https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2009/0368, 2009. 
Bradley, S.: Wind speed errors for LIDARs and SODARs in complex terrain, IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., 1, 012061, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1307/1/1/012061, 2008. 
Brugger, P., Träumner, K., and Jung, C.: Evaluation of a procedure to correct spatial averaging in turbulence statistics from a doppler lidar by comparing time series with an ultrasonic anemometer, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 33, 2135–2144, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-15-0136.1, 2016. 
Download
Short summary
Sonic anemometers are prone to probe-induced flow distortion effects. Here, we present the results of an intercomparison experiment between a CSAT3B sonic anemometer and a high-resolution bistatic Doppler lidar, which is inherently free of flow distortion. Our results show an agreement of the mean wind velocity measurements and the standard deviations of the vertical wind speed with comparabilities of 0.082 and 0.020 m s−1, respectively. Friction velocity is underestimated by the CSAT3B by 3 %.
Share