Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Andrew Habel
Jacobs Technology Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United
States of America
Shawn Urbanski
U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula, Montana,
United States of America
Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Maribel Colón
Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Surender Kaushik
Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Viewed
Total article views: 6,438 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
4,855
1,467
116
6,438
643
151
191
HTML: 4,855
PDF: 1,467
XML: 116
Total: 6,438
Supplement: 643
BibTeX: 151
EndNote: 191
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Sep 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 29 Sep 2020)
Total article views: 5,675 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
4,518
1,051
106
5,675
430
124
171
HTML: 4,518
PDF: 1,051
XML: 106
Total: 5,675
Supplement: 430
BibTeX: 124
EndNote: 171
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Mar 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 04 Mar 2021)
Total article views: 763 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
337
416
10
763
213
27
20
HTML: 337
PDF: 416
XML: 10
Total: 763
Supplement: 213
BibTeX: 27
EndNote: 20
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Sep 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 29 Sep 2020)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 6,438 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 6,162 with geography defined
and 276 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 5,675 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 5,444 with geography defined
and 231 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 763 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 718 with geography defined
and 45 with unknown origin.
This manuscript details field and laboratory-based evaluations of ozone monitoring methods in smoke. UV photometry, the most widely used measurement method for ozone in ambient air, was shown to suffer from a severe positive interference when operated in the presence of smoke, while chemiluminescence-based methods were shown to be free of interferences. The results detailed in this paper will provide monitoring agencies with the tools needed to address smoke-related ozone measurement challenges.
This manuscript details field and laboratory-based evaluations of ozone monitoring methods in...
