Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Andrew Habel
Jacobs Technology Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United
States of America
Shawn Urbanski
U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula, Montana,
United States of America
Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Maribel Colón
Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Surender Kaushik
Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Viewed
Total article views: 6,136 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
4,632
1,405
99
6,136
585
132
169
HTML: 4,632
PDF: 1,405
XML: 99
Total: 6,136
Supplement: 585
BibTeX: 132
EndNote: 169
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Sep 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 29 Sep 2020)
Total article views: 5,394 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
4,300
1,003
91
5,394
401
108
152
HTML: 4,300
PDF: 1,003
XML: 91
Total: 5,394
Supplement: 401
BibTeX: 108
EndNote: 152
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Mar 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 04 Mar 2021)
Total article views: 742 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
332
402
8
742
184
24
17
HTML: 332
PDF: 402
XML: 8
Total: 742
Supplement: 184
BibTeX: 24
EndNote: 17
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Sep 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 29 Sep 2020)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 6,136 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 5,857 with geography defined
and 279 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 5,394 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 5,160 with geography defined
and 234 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 742 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 697 with geography defined
and 45 with unknown origin.
This manuscript details field and laboratory-based evaluations of ozone monitoring methods in smoke. UV photometry, the most widely used measurement method for ozone in ambient air, was shown to suffer from a severe positive interference when operated in the presence of smoke, while chemiluminescence-based methods were shown to be free of interferences. The results detailed in this paper will provide monitoring agencies with the tools needed to address smoke-related ozone measurement challenges.
This manuscript details field and laboratory-based evaluations of ozone monitoring methods in...
