Articles | Volume 14, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1783-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1783-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Comparison of ozone measurement methods in biomass burning smoke: an evaluation under field and laboratory conditions
Russell W. Long
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Andrew Whitehill
Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Andrew Habel
Jacobs Technology Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United
States of America
Shawn Urbanski
U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula, Montana,
United States of America
Hannah Halliday
Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Maribel Colón
Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Surender Kaushik
Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Matthew S. Landis
Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Viewed
Total article views: 5,361 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 29 Sep 2020)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4,085 | 1,196 | 80 | 5,361 | 442 | 85 | 107 |
- HTML: 4,085
- PDF: 1,196
- XML: 80
- Total: 5,361
- Supplement: 442
- BibTeX: 85
- EndNote: 107
Total article views: 4,688 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 04 Mar 2021)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3,776 | 839 | 73 | 4,688 | 306 | 71 | 94 |
- HTML: 3,776
- PDF: 839
- XML: 73
- Total: 4,688
- Supplement: 306
- BibTeX: 71
- EndNote: 94
Total article views: 673 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 29 Sep 2020)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
309 | 357 | 7 | 673 | 136 | 14 | 13 |
- HTML: 309
- PDF: 357
- XML: 7
- Total: 673
- Supplement: 136
- BibTeX: 14
- EndNote: 13
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 5,361 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 5,085 with geography defined
and 276 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 4,688 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,454 with geography defined
and 234 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 673 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 631 with geography defined
and 42 with unknown origin.
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
19 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Association between prenatal exposure to ambient ozone, birth weight, and macrosomia in healthy women C. Zheng et al. 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1000269
- Summary of PM2.5 measurement artifacts associated with the Teledyne T640 PM Mass Monitor under controlled chamber experimental conditions using polydisperse ammonium sulfate aerosols and biomass smoke R. Long et al. 10.1080/10962247.2023.2171156
- Key results from the salt lake regional smoke, ozone, and aerosol study (SAMOZA) D. Jaffe et al. 10.1080/10962247.2024.2301956
- Volatile organic compounds: A threat to the environment and health hazards to living organisms – A review A. Mangotra & S. Singh 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2023.12.013
- Chemical characterization of prescribed burn emissions from a mixed forest in Northern Michigan J. Lee et al. 10.1039/D2EA00069E
- Gaseous ozone to preserve quality and enhance microbial safety of fresh produce: Recent developments and research needs X. Fan 10.1111/1541-4337.12796
- Evaluation of Cairpol and Aeroqual Air Sensors in Biomass Burning Plumes A. Whitehill et al. 10.3390/atmos13060877
- On-Site Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) R. Epping & M. Koch 10.3390/molecules28041598
- Tropospheric ozone measurements at a rural town in New South Wales, Australia M. Riley et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119143
- Long-Term Trends in Inferred Continental Background Ozone in Eastern Australia M. Riley et al. 10.3390/atmos14071104
- Mobile air quality monitoring and comparison to fixed monitoring sites for instrument performance assessment A. Whitehill et al. 10.5194/amt-17-2991-2024
- Investigation of Ozone Formation Chemistry during the Salt Lake Regional Smoke, Ozone, and Aerosol Study (SAMOZA) M. Ninneman et al. 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.3c00235
- Ground-based investigation of HO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and ozone chemistry in biomass burning plumes in rural Idaho A. Lindsay et al. 10.5194/acp-22-4909-2022
- Comment on “Comparison of ozone measurement methods in biomass burning smoke: an evaluation under field and laboratory conditions” by Long et al. (2021) N. Bernays et al. 10.5194/amt-15-3189-2022
- Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emission interferes with real-time regulatory monitoring of ozone in urban atmosphere X. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.uclim.2024.101938
- Long-term evaluation of commercial air quality sensors: an overview from the QUANT (Quantification of Utility of Atmospheric Network Technologies) study S. Diez et al. 10.5194/amt-17-3809-2024
- A Collection of Airborne Measurements and Analyses of Trace Gases Emitted From Multiple Fires in California L. Iraci et al. 10.1029/2021EA002116
- Multi-time-scale surface ozone exposure and associated premature mortalities over Indian cities in different climatological sub-regions C. Kumar et al. 10.1007/s11869-024-01547-w
- A cavity-enhanced ultraviolet absorption instrument for high-precision, fast-time-response ozone measurements R. Hannun et al. 10.5194/amt-13-6877-2020
18 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Association between prenatal exposure to ambient ozone, birth weight, and macrosomia in healthy women C. Zheng et al. 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1000269
- Summary of PM2.5 measurement artifacts associated with the Teledyne T640 PM Mass Monitor under controlled chamber experimental conditions using polydisperse ammonium sulfate aerosols and biomass smoke R. Long et al. 10.1080/10962247.2023.2171156
- Key results from the salt lake regional smoke, ozone, and aerosol study (SAMOZA) D. Jaffe et al. 10.1080/10962247.2024.2301956
- Volatile organic compounds: A threat to the environment and health hazards to living organisms – A review A. Mangotra & S. Singh 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2023.12.013
- Chemical characterization of prescribed burn emissions from a mixed forest in Northern Michigan J. Lee et al. 10.1039/D2EA00069E
- Gaseous ozone to preserve quality and enhance microbial safety of fresh produce: Recent developments and research needs X. Fan 10.1111/1541-4337.12796
- Evaluation of Cairpol and Aeroqual Air Sensors in Biomass Burning Plumes A. Whitehill et al. 10.3390/atmos13060877
- On-Site Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) R. Epping & M. Koch 10.3390/molecules28041598
- Tropospheric ozone measurements at a rural town in New South Wales, Australia M. Riley et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119143
- Long-Term Trends in Inferred Continental Background Ozone in Eastern Australia M. Riley et al. 10.3390/atmos14071104
- Mobile air quality monitoring and comparison to fixed monitoring sites for instrument performance assessment A. Whitehill et al. 10.5194/amt-17-2991-2024
- Investigation of Ozone Formation Chemistry during the Salt Lake Regional Smoke, Ozone, and Aerosol Study (SAMOZA) M. Ninneman et al. 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.3c00235
- Ground-based investigation of HO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and ozone chemistry in biomass burning plumes in rural Idaho A. Lindsay et al. 10.5194/acp-22-4909-2022
- Comment on “Comparison of ozone measurement methods in biomass burning smoke: an evaluation under field and laboratory conditions” by Long et al. (2021) N. Bernays et al. 10.5194/amt-15-3189-2022
- Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emission interferes with real-time regulatory monitoring of ozone in urban atmosphere X. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.uclim.2024.101938
- Long-term evaluation of commercial air quality sensors: an overview from the QUANT (Quantification of Utility of Atmospheric Network Technologies) study S. Diez et al. 10.5194/amt-17-3809-2024
- A Collection of Airborne Measurements and Analyses of Trace Gases Emitted From Multiple Fires in California L. Iraci et al. 10.1029/2021EA002116
- Multi-time-scale surface ozone exposure and associated premature mortalities over Indian cities in different climatological sub-regions C. Kumar et al. 10.1007/s11869-024-01547-w
Latest update: 21 Nov 2024
Short summary
This manuscript details field and laboratory-based evaluations of ozone monitoring methods in smoke. UV photometry, the most widely used measurement method for ozone in ambient air, was shown to suffer from a severe positive interference when operated in the presence of smoke, while chemiluminescence-based methods were shown to be free of interferences. The results detailed in this paper will provide monitoring agencies with the tools needed to address smoke-related ozone measurement challenges.
This manuscript details field and laboratory-based evaluations of ozone monitoring methods in...