Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Andrew Habel
Jacobs Technology Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United
States of America
Shawn Urbanski
U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula, Montana,
United States of America
Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Maribel Colón
Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Surender Kaushik
Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Viewed
Total article views: 6,484 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
4,886
1,480
118
6,484
657
157
195
HTML: 4,886
PDF: 1,480
XML: 118
Total: 6,484
Supplement: 657
BibTeX: 157
EndNote: 195
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Sep 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 29 Sep 2020)
Total article views: 5,714 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
4,548
1,058
108
5,714
439
129
175
HTML: 4,548
PDF: 1,058
XML: 108
Total: 5,714
Supplement: 439
BibTeX: 129
EndNote: 175
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Mar 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 04 Mar 2021)
Total article views: 770 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
338
422
10
770
218
28
20
HTML: 338
PDF: 422
XML: 10
Total: 770
Supplement: 218
BibTeX: 28
EndNote: 20
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Sep 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 29 Sep 2020)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 6,484 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 6,211 with geography defined
and 273 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 5,714 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 5,485 with geography defined
and 229 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 770 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 726 with geography defined
and 44 with unknown origin.
This manuscript details field and laboratory-based evaluations of ozone monitoring methods in smoke. UV photometry, the most widely used measurement method for ozone in ambient air, was shown to suffer from a severe positive interference when operated in the presence of smoke, while chemiluminescence-based methods were shown to be free of interferences. The results detailed in this paper will provide monitoring agencies with the tools needed to address smoke-related ozone measurement challenges.
This manuscript details field and laboratory-based evaluations of ozone monitoring methods in...
