Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Andrew Habel
Jacobs Technology Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United
States of America
Shawn Urbanski
U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula, Montana,
United States of America
Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Maribel Colón
Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Surender Kaushik
Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Viewed
Total article views: 6,403 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
4,832
1,457
114
6,403
637
150
188
HTML: 4,832
PDF: 1,457
XML: 114
Total: 6,403
Supplement: 637
BibTeX: 150
EndNote: 188
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Sep 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 29 Sep 2020)
Total article views: 5,648 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
4,496
1,047
105
5,648
427
123
168
HTML: 4,496
PDF: 1,047
XML: 105
Total: 5,648
Supplement: 427
BibTeX: 123
EndNote: 168
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Mar 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 04 Mar 2021)
Total article views: 755 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
336
410
9
755
210
27
20
HTML: 336
PDF: 410
XML: 9
Total: 755
Supplement: 210
BibTeX: 27
EndNote: 20
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Sep 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 29 Sep 2020)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 6,403 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 6,126 with geography defined
and 277 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 5,648 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 5,416 with geography defined
and 232 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 755 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 710 with geography defined
and 45 with unknown origin.
This manuscript details field and laboratory-based evaluations of ozone monitoring methods in smoke. UV photometry, the most widely used measurement method for ozone in ambient air, was shown to suffer from a severe positive interference when operated in the presence of smoke, while chemiluminescence-based methods were shown to be free of interferences. The results detailed in this paper will provide monitoring agencies with the tools needed to address smoke-related ozone measurement challenges.
This manuscript details field and laboratory-based evaluations of ozone monitoring methods in...
