Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Andrew Habel
Jacobs Technology Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United
States of America
Shawn Urbanski
U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula, Montana,
United States of America
Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Maribel Colón
Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Surender Kaushik
Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research
and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
Viewed
Total article views: 6,091 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
4,612
1,381
98
6,091
578
128
165
HTML: 4,612
PDF: 1,381
XML: 98
Total: 6,091
Supplement: 578
BibTeX: 128
EndNote: 165
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Sep 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 29 Sep 2020)
Total article views: 5,356 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
4,281
985
90
5,356
397
104
148
HTML: 4,281
PDF: 985
XML: 90
Total: 5,356
Supplement: 397
BibTeX: 104
EndNote: 148
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Mar 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 04 Mar 2021)
Total article views: 735 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
331
396
8
735
181
24
17
HTML: 331
PDF: 396
XML: 8
Total: 735
Supplement: 181
BibTeX: 24
EndNote: 17
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Sep 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 29 Sep 2020)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 6,091 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 5,811 with geography defined
and 280 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 5,356 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 5,121 with geography defined
and 235 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 735 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 690 with geography defined
and 45 with unknown origin.
This manuscript details field and laboratory-based evaluations of ozone monitoring methods in smoke. UV photometry, the most widely used measurement method for ozone in ambient air, was shown to suffer from a severe positive interference when operated in the presence of smoke, while chemiluminescence-based methods were shown to be free of interferences. The results detailed in this paper will provide monitoring agencies with the tools needed to address smoke-related ozone measurement challenges.
This manuscript details field and laboratory-based evaluations of ozone monitoring methods in...
