Articles | Volume 14, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2317-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2317-2021
Research article
 | 
25 Mar 2021
Research article |  | 25 Mar 2021

Comparability of calibration strategies for measuring mercury concentrations in gas emission sources and the atmosphere

Iris de Krom, Wijnand Bavius, Ruben Ziel, Elizabeth A. McGhee, Richard J. C. Brown, Igor Živković, Jan Gačnik, Vesna Fajon, Jože Kotnik, Milena Horvat, and Hugo Ent

Viewed

Total article views: 1,908 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,289 581 38 1,908 41 46
  • HTML: 1,289
  • PDF: 581
  • XML: 38
  • Total: 1,908
  • BibTeX: 41
  • EndNote: 46
Views and downloads (calculated since 21 Sep 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 21 Sep 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,908 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,795 with geography defined and 113 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 25 Feb 2024
Download

The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.

Short summary
To demonstrate the robustness and comparability of the novel primary mercury gas standard, the results of comparisons are presented with current calibration methods maintained, using the bell jar in combination with the Dumarey equation or NIST liquid standard reference material. The results show that the primary standard and the NIST reference material are comparable, whereas a difference of −8 % exists between results traceable to the primary standard and the Dumarey equation.