Articles | Volume 14, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2317-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2317-2021
Research article
 | 
25 Mar 2021
Research article |  | 25 Mar 2021

Comparability of calibration strategies for measuring mercury concentrations in gas emission sources and the atmosphere

Iris de Krom, Wijnand Bavius, Ruben Ziel, Elizabeth A. McGhee, Richard J. C. Brown, Igor Živković, Jan Gačnik, Vesna Fajon, Jože Kotnik, Milena Horvat, and Hugo Ent

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Iris de Krom on behalf of the Authors (28 Jan 2021)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (07 Feb 2021) by Saulius Nevas
AR by Iris de Krom on behalf of the Authors (17 Feb 2021)  Manuscript 
Download

The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.

Short summary
To demonstrate the robustness and comparability of the novel primary mercury gas standard, the results of comparisons are presented with current calibration methods maintained, using the bell jar in combination with the Dumarey equation or NIST liquid standard reference material. The results show that the primary standard and the NIST reference material are comparable, whereas a difference of −8 % exists between results traceable to the primary standard and the Dumarey equation.