Articles | Volume 14, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6419-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.Effects of different correction algorithms on absorption coefficient – a comparison of three optical absorption photometers at a boreal forest site
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 06 Oct 2021)
- Supplement to the final revised paper
- Preprint (discussion started on 08 Sep 2020)
- Supplement to the preprint
Interactive discussion
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
- Printer-friendly version
- Supplement
-
SC1: 'Comment on section 4.3', Jorge Saturno, 03 Nov 2020
- AC4: 'Reply on SC1', Krista Luoma, 18 Jul 2021
-
RC1: 'Comments on “A comparison of three optical absorption photometers at a boreal site – effects of different correction algorithms” by Luoma et al.', Anonymous Referee #1, 04 Nov 2020
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Krista Luoma, 18 Jul 2021
-
RC2: 'Review - Comparison... by Luoma et al', Anonymous Referee #2, 09 Nov 2020
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Krista Luoma, 18 Jul 2021
-
RC3: 'Review of amt-2020-325 by Luoma & al', Anonymous Referee #3, 27 Nov 2020
- AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Krista Luoma, 18 Jul 2021
Peer-review completion
AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Krista Luoma on behalf of the Authors (18 Jul 2021)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (29 Jul 2021) by Saulius Nevas
AR by Krista Luoma on behalf of the Authors (18 Aug 2021)
Post-review adjustments
AA: Author's adjustment | EA: Editor approval
AA by Krista Luoma on behalf of the Authors (27 Sep 2021)
Author's adjustment
Manuscript
EA: Adjustments approved (29 Sep 2021) by Saulius Nevas