Articles | Volume 15, issue 22
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6545-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6545-2022
Research article
 | 
17 Nov 2022
Research article |  | 17 Nov 2022

A comparative evaluation of snowflake particle shape estimation techniques used by the Precipitation Imaging Package (PIP), Multi-Angle Snowflake Camera (MASC), and Two-Dimensional Video Disdrometer (2DVD)

Charles Nelson Helms, Stephen Joseph Munchak, Ali Tokay, and Claire Pettersen

Viewed

Total article views: 3,683 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,552 1,015 116 3,683 130 147
  • HTML: 2,552
  • PDF: 1,015
  • XML: 116
  • Total: 3,683
  • BibTeX: 130
  • EndNote: 147
Views and downloads (calculated since 05 Jan 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 05 Jan 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,683 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,528 with geography defined and 155 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 20 May 2026
Download
Short summary
This study compares the techniques used to measure snowflake shape by three instruments: PIP, MASC, and 2DVD. Our findings indicate that the MASC technique produces reliable shape measurements; the 2DVD technique performs better than expected considering the instrument was designed to measure raindrops; and the PIP technique does not produce reliable snowflake shape measurements. We also demonstrate that the PIP images can be reprocessed to correct the shape measurement issues.
Share