Articles | Volume 15, issue 22
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6545-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6545-2022
Research article
 | 
17 Nov 2022
Research article |  | 17 Nov 2022

A comparative evaluation of snowflake particle shape estimation techniques used by the Precipitation Imaging Package (PIP), Multi-Angle Snowflake Camera (MASC), and Two-Dimensional Video Disdrometer (2DVD)

Charles Nelson Helms, Stephen Joseph Munchak, Ali Tokay, and Claire Pettersen

Related authors

Synthesis of surface snowfall rates and radar-observed storm structures in 10+ years of northeastern US winter storms
Laura M. Tomkins, Sandra E. Yuter, Matthew A. Miller, Mariko Oue, and Charles N. Helms
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 9999–10026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-9999-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-9999-2025, 2025
Short summary
Winter Precipitation Measurements in New England: Results from the Global Precipitation Measurement Ground Validation Campaign in Connecticut
Brian C. Filipiak, David B. Wolff, Aaron Spaulding, Ali Tokay, Charles N. Helms, Adrian M. Loftus, Alexey V. Chibisov, Carl Schirtzinger, Mick J. Boulanger, Charanjit S. Pabla, Larry Bliven, Eun Yeol Kim, Francesc Junyent, V. Chandrasekar, Hein Thant, Branislav M. Notaros, Gustavo Britto Hupsel de Azevedo, and Diego Cerrai
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-162,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-162, 2025
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Snow microphysical retrieval from the NASA D3R radar during ICE-POP 2018
S. Joseph Munchak, Robert S. Schrom, Charles N. Helms, and Ali Tokay
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 1439–1464, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1439-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1439-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Bliven, L.: GPM Ground Validation Precipitation Imaging Package (PIP) ICE POP V1, NASA Global Hydrology Resource Center DAAC [data set], Huntsville, Alabama, USA, https://doi.org/10.5067/GPMGV/ICEPOP/PIP/DATA101, 2020. a
Fitzgibbon, A. W. and Fisher, R. B.: A Buyer's Guide to Conic Fitting, in: Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK, 11–14 September 1995, BMVA Press, pp. 513–522, https://doi.org/10.5244/C.9.51, 1995. a
Garrett, T. J., Fallgatter, C., Shkurko, K., and Howlett, D.: Fall speed measurement and high-resolution multi-angle photography of hydrometeors in free fall, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 2625–2633, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-2625-2012, 2012. a, b, c
Heymsfield, A. J. and Westbrook, C. D.: Advances in the estimation of ice particle fall speeds using laboratory and field measurements, J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 2469–2482, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3379.1, 2010. a
Huang, G.-J., Bringi, V. N., Cifelli, R., Hudak, D., and Petersen, W. A.: A methodology to derive radar reflectivity-liquid equivalent snow rate relations using C-band radar and a 2D video disdrometer, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 27, 637–651, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1284.1, 2010. a
Download
Short summary
This study compares the techniques used to measure snowflake shape by three instruments: PIP, MASC, and 2DVD. Our findings indicate that the MASC technique produces reliable shape measurements; the 2DVD technique performs better than expected considering the instrument was designed to measure raindrops; and the PIP technique does not produce reliable snowflake shape measurements. We also demonstrate that the PIP images can be reprocessed to correct the shape measurement issues.
Share