Articles | Volume 15, issue 22
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6545-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6545-2022
Research article
 | 
17 Nov 2022
Research article |  | 17 Nov 2022

A comparative evaluation of snowflake particle shape estimation techniques used by the Precipitation Imaging Package (PIP), Multi-Angle Snowflake Camera (MASC), and Two-Dimensional Video Disdrometer (2DVD)

Charles Nelson Helms, Stephen Joseph Munchak, Ali Tokay, and Claire Pettersen

Related authors

Snow microphysical retrieval from the NASA D3R radar during ICE-POP 2018
S. Joseph Munchak, Robert S. Schrom, Charles N. Helms, and Ali Tokay
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 1439–1464, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1439-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1439-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Others (Wind, Precipitation, Temperature, etc.) | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
How observations from automatic hail sensors in Switzerland shed light on local hailfall duration and compare with hailpad measurements
Jérôme Kopp, Agostino Manzato, Alessandro Hering, Urs Germann, and Olivia Martius
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 3487–3503, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3487-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3487-2023, 2023
Short summary
A data-driven persistence test for robust (probabilistic) quality control of measured environmental time series: constant value episodes
Najmeh Kaffashzadeh
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 3085–3100, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3085-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3085-2023, 2023
Short summary
Estimating the turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate from one-dimensional velocity measurements in time
Marcel Schröder, Tobias Bätge, Eberhard Bodenschatz, Michael Wilczek, and Gholamhossein Bagheri
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-63,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-63, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary
Validation of the WRF-ARW Eclipse Model with Measurements from the 2019 & 2020 Total Solar Eclipses
Carl E. Spangrude, Jennifer W. Fowler, William Graham Moss, and June Wang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-283,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-283, 2023
Short summary
Comparison of GRUAN data products for Meisei iMS-100 and Vaisala RS92 radiosondes at Tateno, Japan
Shunsuke Hoshino, Takuji Sugidachi, Kensaku Shimizu, Eriko Kobayashi, Masatomo Fujiwara, and Masami Iwabuchi
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 5917–5948, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5917-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5917-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Bliven, L.: GPM Ground Validation Precipitation Imaging Package (PIP) ICE POP V1, NASA Global Hydrology Resource Center DAAC [data set], Huntsville, Alabama, USA, https://doi.org/10.5067/GPMGV/ICEPOP/PIP/DATA101, 2020. a
Fitzgibbon, A. W. and Fisher, R. B.: A Buyer's Guide to Conic Fitting, in: Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK, 11–14 September 1995, BMVA Press, pp. 513–522, https://doi.org/10.5244/C.9.51, 1995. a
Garrett, T. J., Fallgatter, C., Shkurko, K., and Howlett, D.: Fall speed measurement and high-resolution multi-angle photography of hydrometeors in free fall, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 2625–2633, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-2625-2012, 2012. a, b, c
Heymsfield, A. J. and Westbrook, C. D.: Advances in the estimation of ice particle fall speeds using laboratory and field measurements, J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 2469–2482, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3379.1, 2010. a
Huang, G.-J., Bringi, V. N., Cifelli, R., Hudak, D., and Petersen, W. A.: A methodology to derive radar reflectivity-liquid equivalent snow rate relations using C-band radar and a 2D video disdrometer, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 27, 637–651, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1284.1, 2010. a
Download
Short summary
This study compares the techniques used to measure snowflake shape by three instruments: PIP, MASC, and 2DVD. Our findings indicate that the MASC technique produces reliable shape measurements; the 2DVD technique performs better than expected considering the instrument was designed to measure raindrops; and the PIP technique does not produce reliable snowflake shape measurements. We also demonstrate that the PIP images can be reprocessed to correct the shape measurement issues.