31 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Environmental Impact by Particulate Material and Meteorological Parameters on the Incidence of Positive Cases of COVID-19 During the First Year of the Pandemic in a High Andean City I. Miranda Hankgo et al. 10.1007/s41748-024-00477-y
2. Air Quality Sensor Experts Convene: Current Quality Assurance Considerations for Credible Data K. Barkjohn et al. 10.1021/acsestair.4c00125
3. A participatory study of indoor environment quality in homes of children and youth in Kanehsatake First Nation R. Ng et al. 10.1038/s41598-024-76328-7
4. Observational Constraints on the Aerosol Optical Depth–Surface PM2.5 Relationship during Alaskan Wildfire Seasons T. Zhao et al. 10.1021/acsestair.4c00120
5. Dust Under the Radar: Rethinking How to Evaluate the Impacts of Dust Events on Air Quality in the United States K. Ardon‐Dryer et al. 10.1029/2023GH000953
6. Calibration of PurpleAir low-cost particulate matter sensors: model development for air quality under high relative humidity conditions M. Mathieu-Campbell et al. 10.5194/amt-17-6735-2024
7. Atmospheric heating in the US from saharan dust: Tracking the June 2020 event with surface and satellite observations M. Mehra et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119988
8. Air Quality Monitoring with Low-Cost Sensors: A Record of the Increase of PM2.5 during Christmas and New Year’s Eve Celebrations in the City of Queretaro, Mexico A. Rodríguez-Trejo et al. 10.3390/atmos15080879
9. A Bayesian-Optimized Surrogate Model Integrating Deep Learning Algorithms for Correcting PurpleAir Sensor Measurements M. Ahmed et al. 10.3390/atmos15121535
10. Assessing low-cost sensor for characterizing temporal variation of PM2.5 in Bandung, Indonesia S. Kurniawati et al. 10.1016/j.kjs.2024.100297
11. Infiltration of Outdoor PM2.5 Pollution into Homes with Evaporative Coolers in Utah County D. Sonntag et al. 10.3390/su16010177
12. Evaluation of Long-Term Performance of Six PM2.5 Sensor Types K. Barkjohn et al. 10.3390/s25041265
13. Seasonally optimized calibrations improve low-cost sensor performance: long-term field evaluation of PurpleAir sensors in urban and rural India M. Campmier et al. 10.5194/amt-16-4357-2023
14. Improving PM10 sensor accuracy in urban areas through calibration in Timișoara R. Blaga & S. Gautam 10.1038/s41612-024-00812-0
15. Five Years of Accurate PM2.5 Measurements Demonstrate the Value of Low-Cost PurpleAir Monitors in Areas Affected by Woodsmoke D. Robinson et al. 10.3390/ijerph20237127
16. Technical note: Identifying a performance change in the Plantower PMS 5003 particulate matter sensor N. Searle et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2023.106256
17. Application and validation of a wearable monitor for assessing time- and location-resolved exposures to particulate matter in California’s Central Valley X. Li et al. 10.1080/02786826.2024.2415481
18. Fundamentals of low-cost aerosol sensor design and operation J. Ouimette et al. 10.1080/02786826.2023.2285935
19. Exploration of intra-city and inter-city PM2.5 regional calibration models to improve low-cost sensor performance S. Jain & N. Zimmerman 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2024.106335
20. Particle number size distribution evaluation of Plantower PMS5003 low-cost PM sensors – a field experiment A. Caseiro et al. 10.1039/D4EA00086B
21. Indication Variability of the Particulate Matter Sensors Dependent on Their Location A. Wiora et al. 10.3390/s24051683
22. Highly Time-Resolved Apportionment of Carbonaceous Aerosols from Wildfire Using the TC–BC Method: Camp Fire 2018 Case Study M. Ivančič et al. 10.3390/toxics11060497
23. Is the smoke aloft? Caveats regarding the use of the Hazard Mapping System (HMS) smoke product as a proxy for surface smoke presence across the United States T. Liu et al. 10.1071/WF23148
24. Practical considerations for using low-cost sensors to assess wildfire smoke exposure in school and childcare settings O. Stampfer et al. 10.1038/s41370-024-00677-8
25. Dataset on indoor and outdoor PM2.5 concentrations at two residences using low-cost sensors in the Rio Grande Valley Region of South Texas K. Shah et al. 10.1016/j.dib.2025.111492
26. Spatial Variation of PM2.5 Indoors and Outdoors: Results from 261 Regulatory Monitors Compared to 14,000 Low-Cost Monitors in Three Western States over 4.7 Years L. Wallace & T. Zhao 10.3390/s23094387
27. High-resolution urban air quality monitoring from citizen science data with echo-state transformer networks M. Bonas & S. Castruccio 10.1093/jrsssc/qlaf007
28. Urban Air Quality Management at Low Cost Using Micro Air Sensors: A Case Study from Accra, Ghana C. Hodoli et al. 10.1021/acsestair.4c00172
29. Indoor and ambient influences on PM2.5 exposure and well-being for a rail impacted community and implications for personal protections I. Torres et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad90f5
30. Correction and Accuracy of PurpleAir PM2.5 Measurements for Extreme Wildfire Smoke K. Barkjohn et al. 10.3390/s22249669
31. Size-Resolved Field Performance of Low-Cost Sensors for Particulate Matter Air Pollution E. Molina Rueda et al. 10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00030