Articles | Volume 16, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2943-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2943-2023
Research article
 | 
14 Jun 2023
Research article |  | 14 Jun 2023

Estimation of extreme precipitation events in Estonia and Italy using dual-polarization weather radar quantitative precipitation estimations

Roberto Cremonini, Tanel Voormansik, Piia Post, and Dmitri Moisseev

Related authors

Database of the Italian disdrometer network
Elisa Adirosi, Federico Porcù, Mario Montopoli, Luca Baldini, Alessandro Bracci, Vincenzo Capozzi, Clizia Annella, Giorgio Budillon, Edoardo Bucchignani, Alessandra Lucia Zollo, Orietta Cazzuli, Giulio Camisani, Renzo Bechini, Roberto Cremonini, Andrea Antonini, Alberto Ortolani, Samantha Melani, Paolo Valisa, and Simone Scapin
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2417–2429, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2417-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2417-2023, 2023
Short summary
Observed snow depth trends in the European Alps: 1971 to 2019
Michael Matiu, Alice Crespi, Giacomo Bertoldi, Carlo Maria Carmagnola, Christoph Marty, Samuel Morin, Wolfgang Schöner, Daniele Cat Berro, Gabriele Chiogna, Ludovica De Gregorio, Sven Kotlarski, Bruno Majone, Gernot Resch, Silvia Terzago, Mauro Valt, Walter Beozzo, Paola Cianfarra, Isabelle Gouttevin, Giorgia Marcolini, Claudia Notarnicola, Marcello Petitta, Simon C. Scherrer, Ulrich Strasser, Michael Winkler, Marc Zebisch, Andrea Cicogna, Roberto Cremonini, Andrea Debernardi, Mattia Faletto, Mauro Gaddo, Lorenzo Giovannini, Luca Mercalli, Jean-Michel Soubeyroux, Andrea Sušnik, Alberto Trenti, Stefano Urbani, and Viktor Weilguni
The Cryosphere, 15, 1343–1382, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1343-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1343-2021, 2021
Short summary
Comparison of landslide forecasting services in Piedmont (Italy) and Norway, illustrated by events in late spring 2013
Graziella Devoli, Davide Tiranti, Roberto Cremonini, Monica Sund, and Søren Boje
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1351–1372, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1351-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1351-2018, 2018
An integrated approach to monitoring the calibration stability of operational dual-polarization radars
Mattia Vaccarono, Renzo Bechini, Chandra V. Chandrasekar, Roberto Cremonini, and Claudio Cassardo
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 5367–5383, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5367-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5367-2016, 2016
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Others (Wind, Precipitation, Temperature, etc.) | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Observations of tall-building wakes using a scanning Doppler lidar
Natalie E. Theeuwes, Janet F. Barlow, Antti Mannisenaho, Denise Hertwig, Ewan O'Connor, and Alan Robins
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1355–1371, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1355-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1355-2025, 2025
Short summary
Mid-Atlantic nocturnal low-level jet characteristics: a machine learning analysis of radar wind profiles
Maurice Roots, John T. Sullivan, and Belay Demoz
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1269–1282, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1269-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1269-2025, 2025
Short summary
Mitigating radome-induced bias in X-band weather radar polarimetric moments using an adaptive discrete Fourier transform algorithm
Padmanabhan Thiruvengadam, Guillaume Lesage, Ambinintsoa Volatiana Ramanamahefa, and Joël Van Baelen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1185–1191, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1185-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1185-2025, 2025
Short summary
GNSS-RO residual ionospheric error (RIE): a new method and assessment
Dong L. Wu, Valery A. Yudin, Kyu-Myong Kim, Mohar Chattopadhyay, Lawrence Coy, Ruth S. Lieberman, C. C. Jude H. Salinas, Jae N. Lee, Jie Gong, and Guiping Liu
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 843–863, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-843-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-843-2025, 2025
Short summary
Benchmarking KDP in rainfall: a quantitative assessment of estimation algorithms using C-band weather radar observations
Miguel Aldana, Seppo Pulkkinen, Annakaisa von Lerber, Matthew R. Kumjian, and Dmitri Moisseev
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 793–816, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-793-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-793-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Allen, R. J. and De Gaetano, A. T.: Considerations for the use of radar-derived precipitation estimates in determining return intervals for extreme areal precipitation amounts, J. Hydrol., 315, 203–219, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.03.028, 2005. a
Brandes, E. A., Ryzhkov, A. V., and Zrnić Dušan S.: An evaluation of radar rainfall estimates from specific differential phase, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 18, 363–375, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2001)018<0363:AEORRE>2.0.CO;2​​​​​​​, 2001. a
Bringi, V. N. and Chandrasekar, V.: Polarimetric Doppler Weather Radar, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 636 pp., ISBN 9780511541094, 2001. a
Buishand, T. A.: Extreme rainfall estimation by combining data from several sites, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 36, 345–365, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626669109492519, 1991. a
Coles, S.: An introduction to statistical modeling of extreme values, Springer, London, ISBN 978-1-4471-3675-0, 2001. a, b
Download
Short summary
Extreme rainfall for a specific location is commonly evaluated when designing stormwater management systems. This study investigates the use of quantitative precipitation estimations (QPEs) based on polarimetric weather radar data, without rain gauge corrections, to estimate 1 h rainfall total maxima in Italy and Estonia. We show that dual-polarization weather radar provides reliable QPEs and effective estimations of return periods for extreme rainfall in climatologically homogeneous regions.
Share