Thanks to the reviewer for the opinion and comments!

The information that the manual rain gauges used in our work are of the Hellmann type is very important, of course. Such specification can be found in the paper on line 130, in section 2.2 “Rain gauge data”.

Your comment about the possibility of dynamic overshooting recognition in case of winter precipitation is very interesting. It is possible in the case of partial overshooting to roughly estimate what part of the precipitation has been overshooted, as long as it is not convective. But what to do in the case of total overshooting, i.e. at greater distances from the radar? We could lower the QI a priori at these locations on the basis of some statistical relationship, but then it would not be a dynamic but a static quality factor related only to the distance from the radar, and we already have this kind of factors in the applied QI scheme. However, we will consider what the possibilities are for a dynamic approach to recognising this phenomenon because it is, as it turns out, important for the estimation of the precipitation field.

Many thanks to the reviewer for the positive assessment of our paper! Of course, we will read our text carefully in terms of searching for all misprints.