Articles | Volume 16, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5051-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5051-2023
Research article
 | 
01 Nov 2023
Research article |  | 01 Nov 2023

Intercomparison of detection and quantification methods for methane emissions from the natural gas distribution network in Hamburg, Germany

Hossein Maazallahi, Antonio Delre, Charlotte Scheutz, Anders M. Fredenslund, Stefan Schwietzke, Hugo Denier van der Gon, and Thomas Röckmann

Data sets

Mobile and tracer measurements H. Maazallahi, A. Delre, C. Scheutz, A. M. Fredenslund, S. Schwietzke, H. Denier van der Gon and T. Röckmann https://fileshare.icos-cp.eu/s/wTjBngNKfCBi2PL

Download
Short summary
Measurement methods are increasingly deployed to verify reported methane emissions of gas leaks. This study describes unique advantages and limitations of three methods. Two methods are rapidly deployed, but uncertainties and biases exist for some leak locations. In contrast, the suction method could accurately determine leak rates in principle. However, this method, which provides data for the German emission inventory, creates an overall low bias in our study due to non-random site selection.