Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
AMT
Articles | Volume 16, issue 21
Articles | Volume 16, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5051-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5051-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 16, issue 21
Research article
 | 
01 Nov 2023
Research article |  | 01 Nov 2023

Intercomparison of detection and quantification methods for methane emissions from the natural gas distribution network in Hamburg, Germany

Hossein Maazallahi, Antonio Delre, Charlotte Scheutz, Anders M. Fredenslund, Stefan Schwietzke, Hugo Denier van der Gon, and Thomas Röckmann

Viewed

Total article views: 3,484 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,508 874 102 3,484 280 87 114
  • HTML: 2,508
  • PDF: 874
  • XML: 102
  • Total: 3,484
  • Supplement: 280
  • BibTeX: 87
  • EndNote: 114
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 May 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 May 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,484 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,435 with geography defined and 49 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 01 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
Measurement methods are increasingly deployed to verify reported methane emissions of gas leaks. This study describes unique advantages and limitations of three methods. Two methods are rapidly deployed, but uncertainties and biases exist for some leak locations. In contrast, the suction method could accurately determine leak rates in principle. However, this method, which provides data for the German emission inventory, creates an overall low bias in our study due to non-random site selection.
Read more
Share