Articles | Volume 17, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2055-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2055-2024
Research article
 | 
11 Apr 2024
Research article |  | 11 Apr 2024

Two new 222Rn emanation sources – a comparison study

Tanita J. Ballé, Stefan Röttger, Florian Mertes, Anja Honig, Petr Kovar, Petr P. S. Otáhal, and Annette Röttger

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1158', Anonymous Referee #1, 23 Oct 2023
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Tanita Ballé, 08 Nov 2023
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1158', Ileana Radulescu, 24 Oct 2023
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Tanita Ballé, 08 Nov 2023

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
AR by Tanita Ballé on behalf of the Authors (08 Nov 2023)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (20 Nov 2023) by Claudia Grossi
RR by Ileana Radulescu (22 Nov 2023)
RR by Dafina Kikaj (24 Nov 2023)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (27 Nov 2023) by Claudia Grossi
AR by Tanita Ballé on behalf of the Authors (30 Nov 2023)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (01 Dec 2023) by Claudia Grossi
AR by Tanita Ballé on behalf of the Authors (29 Jan 2024)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (31 Jan 2024) by Claudia Grossi
AR by Tanita Ballé on behalf of the Authors (06 Feb 2024)  Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
Over 50 % of naturally occurring radiation exposure is due to 222Rn (progenies), but traceability of measurements to the International System of Units (SI) is lacking. To address this, two new 222Rn sources were developed to be used as calibration standards for reference instruments. These sources were investigated by comparing their estimated calibration factors for one instrument. Despite the small differences derived, all uncertainties are well within the intended target uncertainty of 10 %.