Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
AMT
Articles | Volume 17, issue 7
Articles | Volume 17, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2055-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2055-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 17, issue 7
Research article
 | 
11 Apr 2024
Research article |  | 11 Apr 2024

Two new 222Rn emanation sources – a comparison study

Tanita J. Ballé, Stefan Röttger, Florian Mertes, Anja Honig, Petr Kovar, Petr P. S. Otáhal, and Annette Röttger

Viewed

Total article views: 936 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
675 183 78 936 61 55
  • HTML: 675
  • PDF: 183
  • XML: 78
  • Total: 936
  • BibTeX: 61
  • EndNote: 55
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Jul 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Jul 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 936 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 925 with geography defined and 11 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 04 Feb 2025
Download
Short summary
Over 50 % of naturally occurring radiation exposure is due to 222Rn (progenies), but traceability of measurements to the International System of Units (SI) is lacking. To address this, two new 222Rn sources were developed to be used as calibration standards for reference instruments. These sources were investigated by comparing their estimated calibration factors for one instrument. Despite the small differences derived, all uncertainties are well within the intended target uncertainty of 10 %.
Read more
Share
Special issue
Outcomes of the traceRadon project: radon metrology for use...