Articles | Volume 17, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-235-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-235-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
A new power-law model for μ–Λ relationships in convective and stratiform rainfall
Christos Gatidis
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
Marc Schleiss
Department of Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
Christine Unal
Department of Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
Related authors
Christos Gatidis, Marc Schleiss, and Christine Unal
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4951–4969, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4951-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4951-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Knowledge of the raindrop size distribution (DSD) is crucial for understanding rainfall microphysics and quantifying uncertainty in quantitative precipitation estimates. In this study a general overview of the DSD retrieval approach from a polarimetric radar is discussed, highlighting sensitivity to potential sources of errors, either directly linked to the radar measurements or indirectly through the critical modeling assumptions behind the method such as the shape–size (μ–Λ) relationship.
Martin Fencl and Marc Schleiss
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 4467–4482, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4467-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4467-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
A novel disaggregation algorithm for commercial microwave links (CMLs), named CLEAR (CML Segments with Equal Amounts of Rain), is proposed. CLEAR utilizes a multiplicative random cascade generator to control the splitting of link segments. The evaluation performed both on virtual and real CML data shows that CLEAR outperforms a commonly used benchmark algorithm. Moreover, the stochastic nature of CLEAR allows it to represent uncertainty as an ensemble of rain rate distributions along CML paths.
Ho Yi Lydia Mak and Christine Unal
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1209–1242, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1209-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1209-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The dynamics of thunderclouds are studied using cloud radar. Supercooled liquid water and conical graupel are likely present, while chain-like ice crystals may occur at cloud top. Ice crystals are vertically aligned seconds before lightning and resume their usual horizontal alignment afterwards in some cases. Updrafts and downdrafts are found near cloud core and edges respectively. Turbulence is strong. Radar measurement modes that are more suited for investigating thunderstorms are recommended.
Ioanna Tsikoudi, Alessandro Battaglia, Christine Unal, and Eleni Marinou
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3164, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3164, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The study simulates spectral polarimetric variables for raindrops as observed by a cloud radar. Raindrops are modelled as oblate spheroids and backscattering properties are computed via the T-matrix method including noise, turbulence and spectral averaging effects. When comparing simulations to measurements, differences on the amplitudes of polarimetric variables are noted. This shows the challenge of using simplified shapes to model raindrop polarimetric variables when moving to mm wavelengths.
Marc Schleiss
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4789–4802, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4789-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4789-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Research is conducted to identify special rainfall patterns in the Netherlands using multiple types of rainfall sensors. A total of eight potentially unique events are analyzed, considering both the number and size of raindrops. However, no clear evidence supporting the existence of a special rainfall regime could be found. The results highlight the challenges in experimentally confirming well-established theoretical ideas in the field of precipitation sciences.
José Dias Neto, Louise Nuijens, Christine Unal, and Steven Knoop
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 769–789, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-769-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-769-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes a dataset from a novel experimental setup to retrieve wind speed and direction profiles, combining cloud radars and wind lidar. This setup allows retrieving profiles from near the surface to the top of clouds. The field campaign occurred in Cabauw, the Netherlands, between September 13th and October 3rd 2021. This paper also provides examples of applications of this dataset (e.g. studying atmospheric turbulence, validating numerical atmospheric models).
Christos Gatidis, Marc Schleiss, and Christine Unal
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4951–4969, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4951-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4951-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Knowledge of the raindrop size distribution (DSD) is crucial for understanding rainfall microphysics and quantifying uncertainty in quantitative precipitation estimates. In this study a general overview of the DSD retrieval approach from a polarimetric radar is discussed, highlighting sensitivity to potential sources of errors, either directly linked to the radar measurements or indirectly through the critical modeling assumptions behind the method such as the shape–size (μ–Λ) relationship.
Anna Špačková, Vojtěch Bareš, Martin Fencl, Marc Schleiss, Joël Jaffrain, Alexis Berne, and Jörg Rieckermann
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4219–4240, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4219-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4219-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
An original dataset of microwave signal attenuation and rainfall variables was collected during 1-year-long field campaign. The monitored 38 GHz dual-polarized commercial microwave link with a short sampling resolution (4 s) was accompanied by five disdrometers and three rain gauges along its path. Antenna radomes were temporarily shielded for approximately half of the campaign period to investigate antenna wetting impacts.
Didier de Villiers, Marc Schleiss, Marie-Claire ten Veldhuis, Rolf Hut, and Nick van de Giesen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5607–5623, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5607-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5607-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Ground-based rainfall observations across the African continent are sparse. We present a new and inexpensive rainfall measuring instrument (the intervalometer) and use it to derive reasonably accurate rainfall rates. These are dependent on a fundamental assumption that is widely used in parameterisations of the rain drop size distribution. This assumption is tested and found to not apply for most raindrops but is still useful in deriving rainfall rates. The intervalometer shows good potential.
Cited articles
Bringi, V. N. and Chandrasekar, V.: Polarimetric Doppler Weather Radar: Principles and Applications, Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511541094, 2001. a
Bringi, V. N., Chandrasekar, V., Hubbert, J., Gorgucci, E., Randeu, W. L., and Schoenhuber, M.: Raindrop Size Distribution in Different Climatic Regimes from Disdrometer and Dual-Polarized Radar Analysis, J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 354–365, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060<0354:RSDIDC>2.0.CO;2, 2003. a, b, c, d
Chen, B., Wang, J., and Gong, D.: Raindrop Size Distribution in a Midlatitude Continental Squall Line Measured by Thies Optical Disdrometers over East China, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 55, 621–634, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-15-0127.1, 2016. a
Chu, Y.-H. and Su, C.-L.: An Investigation of the Slope–Shape Relation for Gamma Raindrop Size Distribution, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 47, 2531–2544, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAMC1755.1, 2008. a
Friedrich, K., Higgins, S., Masters, F. J., and Lopez, C. R.: Articulating and Stationary PARSIVEL Disdrometer Measurements in Conditions with Strong Winds and Heavy Rainfall, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 30, 2063–2080, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00254.1, 2013a. a
Friedrich, K., Kalina, E. A., Masters, F. J., and Lopez, C. R.: Drop-Size Distributions in Thunderstorms Measured by Optical Disdrometers during VORTEX2, Mon. Weather Rev., 141, 1182–1203, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-12-00116.1, 2013b. a
Gatidis, C., Schleiss, M., Unal, C., and Russchenberg, H.: A Critical Evaluation of the Adequacy of the Gamma Model for Representing Raindrop Size Distributions, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 37, 1765–1779, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-19-0106.1, 2020. a, b, c, d
Gatidis, C., Schleiss, M., and Unal, C.: Sensitivity analysis of DSD retrievals from polarimetric radar in stratiform rain based on the μ–Λ relationship, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4951–4969, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4951-2022, 2022. a, b, c
Ghada, W., Casellas, E., Herbinger, J., Garcia-Benadí, A., Bothmann, L., Estrella, N., Bech, J., and Menzel, A.: Stratiform and Convective Rain Classification Using Machine Learning Models and Micro Rain Radar, Remote Sens., 14, 4563, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14184563, 2022. a
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Biavati, G., Horányi, A., Muñoz Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Rozum, I., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Dee, D., Thépaut, J-N. (2023): ERA5 hourly data on single levels from 1940 to present. Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) [data set], https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47, 2023. a
Kliche, D. V., Smith, P. L., and Johnson, R. W.: L-Moment Estimators as Applied to Gamma Drop Size Distributions, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 47, 3117–3130, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAMC1936.1, 2008. a
Lee, G., Zawadzki, I., Szyrmer, W., Sempere-Torres, D., and Uijlenhoet, R.: A general approach to double-moment normalization of drop size distributions, J. Appl. Meteor., 43, 264–281, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2004)043<0264:AGATDN>2.0.CO;2, 2004. a
Lin, L., Bao, X., Zhang, S., Zhao, B., and Xia, W.: Correction to raindrop size distributions measured by PARSIVEL disdrometers in strong winds, Atmos. Res., 260, 105728, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105728, 2021. a
Löffler-Mang, M. and Joss, J.: An Optical Disdrometer for Measuring Size and Velocity of Hydrometeors, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 17, 130–139, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2000)017<0130:AODFMS>2.0.CO;2, 2000. a
Powell, S. W., Houze, R. A., and Brodzik, S. R.: Rainfall-Type Categorization of Radar Echoes Using Polar Coordinate Reflectivity Data, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 33, 523–538, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-15-0135.1, 2016. a
Qi, Y., Zhang, J., and Zhang, P.: A real-time automated convective and stratiform precipitation segregation algorithm in native radar coordinates, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 139, 2233–2240, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2095, 2013. a
Romatschke, U. and Dixon, M. J.: Vertically Resolved Convective–Stratiform Echo-Type Identification and Convectivity Retrieval for Vertically Pointing Radars, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 39, 1705–1716, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-22-0019.1, 2022. a
Russchenberg, H., Apituley, A., and Holzinger, R.: The Ruisdael Observatory: advancing atmospheric science in the Netherlands, EMS Annual Meeting 2022, Bonn, Germany, 5–9 Sep 2022, EMS2022-200, https://doi.org/10.5194/ems2022-200, 2022. a
Schumacher, R. S., Clark, A. J., Xue, M., and Kong, F.: Factors Influencing the Development and Maintenance of Nocturnal Heavy-Rain-Producing Convective Systems in a Storm-Scale Ensemble, Mon. Weather Rev., 141, 2778–2801, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-12-00239.1, 2013. a
Seela, B. K., Janapati, J., Lin, P.-L., Wang, P. K., and Lee, M.-T.: Raindrop Size Distribution Characteristics of Summer and Winter Season Rainfall Over North Taiwan, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 11602–11624, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028307, 2018. a
Seifert, A.: On the Shape–Slope Relation of Drop Size Distributions in Convective Rain, J. Appl. Meteorol., 44, 1146–1151, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2254.1, 2005. a
Smith, P. L. and Kliche, D. V.: The Bias in Moment Estimators for Parameters of Drop Size Distribution Functions: Sampling from Exponential Distributions, J. Appl. Meteorol., 44, 1195–1205, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2258.1, 2005. a
Smith, P. L., Kliche, D. V., and Johnson, R. W.: The Bias and Error in Moment Estimators for Parameters of Drop Size Distribution Functions: Sampling from Gamma Distributions, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 48, 2118–2126, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAMC2114.1, 2009. a
Testud, J., Oury, S., Black, R. A., Amayenc, P., and Dou, X.: The Concept of “Normalized” Distribution to Describe Raindrop Spectra: A Tool for Cloud Physics and Cloud Remote Sensing, J. Appl. Meteorol., 40, 1118–1140, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040<1118:TCONDT>2.0.CO;2, 2001. a
Thurai, M., Petersen, W. A., Tokay, A., Schultz, C., and Gatlin, P.: Drop size distribution comparisons between Parsivel and 2-D video disdrometers, Adv. Geosci., 30, 3–9, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-30-3-2011, 2011. a
Thurai, M., Williams, C., and Bringi, V.: Examining the correlations between drop size distribution parameters using data from two side-by-side 2D-video disdrometers, Atmos. Res., 144, 95–110, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.01.002, 2014. a, b
Thurai, M., Bringi, V., Gatlin, P. N., Petersen, W. A., and Wingo, M. T.: Measurements and Modeling of the Full Rain Drop Size Distribution, Atmosphere, 10, 39, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10010039, 2019. a
Tokay, A. and Short, D. A.: Evidence from Tropical Raindrop Spectra of the Origin of Rain from Stratiform versus Convective Clouds, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 35, 355–371, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1996)035<0355:EFTRSO>2.0.CO;2, 1996. a
Tokay, A., Wolff, D. B., and Petersen, W. A.: Evaluation of the New Version of the Laser-Optical Disdrometer, OTT Parsivel2, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 31, 1276–1288, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00174.1, 2014. a
Tokay, A., D'Adderio, L. P., Wolff, D. B., and Petersen, W. A.: Development and Evaluation of the Raindrop Size Distribution Parameters for the NASA Global Precipitation Measurement Mission Ground Validation Program, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 37, 115–128, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-18-0071.1, 2020. a
Ulbrich, C. W. and Atlas, D.: Microphysics of Raindrop Size Spectra: Tropical Continental and Maritime Storms, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 46, 1777–1791, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAMC1649.1, 2007. a
van Leth, T. C., Leijnse, H., Overeem, A., and Uijlenhoet, R.: Estimating raindrop size distributions using microwave link measurements: potential and limitations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1797–1815, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1797-2020, 2020. a, b, c
Vivekanandan, J., Zhang, G., and Brandes, E.: Polarimetric Radar Estimators Based on a Constrained Gamma Drop Size Distribution Model, J. Appl. Meteorol., 43, 217–230, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2004)043<0217:PREBOA>2.0.CO;2, 2004. a
Yang, Z., Liu, P., and Yang, Y.: Convective/Stratiform Precipitation Classification Using Ground-Based Doppler Radar Data Based on the K-Nearest Neighbor Algorithm, Remote Sens., 11, 2277, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11192277, 2019. a
Zhang, G., Vivekanandan, J., Brandes, E. A., Meneghini, R., and Kozu, T.: The Shape–Slope Relation in Observed Gamma Raindrop Size Distributions: Statistical Error or Useful Information?, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 20, 1106–1119, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2003)020<1106:TSRIOG>2.0.CO;2, 2003. a, b, c, d, e, f
Short summary
A common method to retrieve important information about the microphysical structure of rain (DSD retrievals) requires a constrained relationship between the drop size distribution parameters. The most widely accepted empirical relationship is between μ and Λ. The relationship shows variability across the different types of rainfall (convective or stratiform). The new proposed power-law model to represent the μ–Λ relation provides a better physical interpretation of the relationship coefficients.
A common method to retrieve important information about the microphysical structure of rain (DSD...