Articles | Volume 18, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4871-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4871-2025
Research article
 | 
29 Sep 2025
Research article |  | 29 Sep 2025

A 30-month field evaluation of low-cost CO2 sensors using a reference instrument

Qixiang Cai, Ning Zeng, Xiaoyu Yang, Chi Xu, Zhaojun Wang, and Pengfei Han

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1240', Anonymous Referee #1, 20 May 2025
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1240', Anonymous Referee #2, 23 May 2025

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
AR by Pengfei Han on behalf of the Authors (24 Jun 2025)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (01 Jul 2025) by Andre Butz
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (09 Jul 2025)
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (11 Jul 2025) by Andre Butz
AR by Pengfei Han on behalf of the Authors (12 Jul 2025)  Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
Mid- and low-cost CO2 sensors are attractive in carbon monitoring and atmospheric inversions. They are useful in both fixed stations and mobile monitoring. Yet the performance faces great challenges due to environmental impacts and long-term drifts. Here, we conducted 30 months of co-located observations using such sensors with a reference instrument. After corrections of environmental impacts and drifts, the accuracy reached 1–3 ppm. We recommend standard gas calibration within 3–6 months.
Share