Articles | Volume 18, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4871-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.Special issue:
A 30-month field evaluation of low-cost CO2 sensors using a reference instrument
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 29 Sep 2025)
- Supplement to the final revised paper
- Preprint (discussion started on 01 Apr 2025)
- Supplement to the preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor
| : Report abuse
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1240', Anonymous Referee #1, 20 May 2025
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Pengfei Han, 24 Jun 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1240', Anonymous Referee #2, 23 May 2025
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Pengfei Han, 24 Jun 2025
- AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Pengfei Han, 24 Jun 2025
Peer review completion
AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
AR by Pengfei Han on behalf of the Authors (24 Jun 2025)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (01 Jul 2025) by Andre Butz
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (09 Jul 2025)
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (11 Jul 2025) by Andre Butz

AR by Pengfei Han on behalf of the Authors (12 Jul 2025)
Manuscript
Overall good research and worthwhile of publication with revisions. Further details needed about the experiment setup and how correction coefficients were established. Given the current details it would be difficult for a reader to replicate this work. Additionally, minor spelling and language changes are needed.
Despite these notes, having a 30-month analysis alongside a CRDS for low-cost sensors is impressive, significant, and worth publication. I was excited to see this work, and long time-frame pieces like this can further the research community.
Comments:
Line 49: When referencing Picarro or ABB-LGR, might want to reference measurement techniques those instruments use (CRDS, etc.)
Line 50: Awkward phrasing for cost comparison, might want to use a direct cost range instead
Line 58: Which cities in particular are being referenced?
Line 76: “deployed to co-locate” is awkward, should this be “colocated” instead?
Line 83: Section 2 title is awkward - application to what?
Line 87: references “higher-quality” while majority of paper references higher precision
Line 94: What is the JJJ network? This is the only time it is mentioned
Line 102: Check capitalization for Bao
Lines 107 - 110: How does air move in the box? Is it passive? Later experiment mentioned a pump used to move air into the box but nothing mentioned here about that. Is the system designed to be used passively or will it have to be used with a pump when deployed in the field?
Lines 154 - 157: More details are needed about how the sensitivity correction is done - a reader can’t replicate a similar experiment based on what is provided here. Was this done with an environmental chamber or on lab bench sampling ambient conditions? How long was this comparison done for, and at what temperature steps?
Lines 193 - 196: More details are also needed about how the experiment works. Does the SENSE-IAP system have it's own pump? Is the outflow from the main pump being directed into the SENSE-IAP systems and the Picarro siphoning off them?
Line 194: What kind of dryer is being used?
Figure 4b: This figure is confusing - Which is the pump in the figure and where is it located? Also which is the 4-way valve?
Figure 6: This figure is good but I found the order confusing. Figure 6 is showing corrected results while 7 shows uncorrected results. It was difficult for me to follow the analysis with the shuffling back and forth.
Line 238: “with [a] Picarro”
Line 240: “effectively corrects the impacts of diurnal environmental changes” - need to back this up with either a figure or analysis from a previous section
Lines 267 - 273: It was not clear to me if the RMSE evaluation was done on the same period used to do the drift corrections or another independent dataset.
Line 296: “manufacturer”
Line 364: Capitalization of names