Articles | Volume 18, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4885-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4885-2025
Research article
 | 
29 Sep 2025
Research article |  | 29 Sep 2025

Performance and evaluation of remote sensing satellites for monitoring dust weather in East Asia

Yuanyuan Zhang, Ning Wang, and Shuanggen Jin

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-992', Anonymous Referee #1, 10 Apr 2025
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-992', Anonymous Referee #2, 27 Apr 2025

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
AR by Yuanyuan Zhang on behalf of the Authors (17 Jun 2025)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (01 Jul 2025) by Omar Torres
AR by Yuanyuan Zhang on behalf of the Authors (03 Jul 2025)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (08 Jul 2025) by Omar Torres
AR by Yuanyuan Zhang on behalf of the Authors (10 Jul 2025)
Download
Short summary
Satellite remote sensing helps monitor dust storms. Our study compared five satellite products that use ground-based PM10 data. Most products agreed on the daily dust distribution, with absorbing aerosol index (AAI) performing best under cloud cover. Overall, the Sentinel-5P AAI has the highest probability of correct detection (POCD) in dust events but is unstable and has a high probability of false detection (POFD). The FY4A/B infrared difference dust index (IDDI) has the lowest POCD, but it is relatively stable, and its POFD is low.
Share