Articles | Volume 18, issue 19
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4923-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.The ATMONSYS water vapor DIAL: advanced measurements of short-term variability in the planetary boundary layer
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 30 Sep 2025)
- Preprint (discussion started on 16 Oct 2024)
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor
| : Report abuse
-
RC1: 'Comment on amt-2024-168', Anonymous Referee #1, 25 Oct 2024
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Johannes Speidel, 01 Mar 2025
- AC3: 'Reply on RC1', Johannes Speidel, 01 Mar 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on amt-2024-168', Anonymous Referee #2, 06 Dec 2024
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Johannes Speidel, 01 Mar 2025
Peer review completion
AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
AR by Johannes Speidel on behalf of the Authors (01 Mar 2025)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (24 Mar 2025) by John Sullivan
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (28 Mar 2025)

ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (01 Apr 2025) by John Sullivan

AR by Johannes Speidel on behalf of the Authors (11 Apr 2025)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (02 Jun 2025) by John Sullivan
AR by Johannes Speidel on behalf of the Authors (10 Jun 2025)
Summary
The paper describes an instrument designed to continuously profile water vapor in the lower atmosphere at short time scales (10s averaging for Nyquist frequency of 0.05Hz). The instrument design and relevant specifications are described. An hour of high resolution data in the PBL and above are shown as examples. The goal is to resolve turbulence and an analysis of turbulence spectra are highlighted. The instrument is compared to radiosondes and state-of-the-art Raman lidar systems. Overall the paper achieves its objectives but there are some concerns and issues that need to be addressed.
Specific comments: major issues and concerns
Technical corrections: minor grammar, misspellings, or strange word choices
Line 10. ‘Evaded’ perhaps 'explained' would be better?
Line 16. Shreded is misspelled, but suggest changing to ‘broken clouds’
Line 46. Deeply requested. Suggest changing to ‘often requested’
Line 140. ‘Begin of the lidar range’. Suggest ‘start of the lidar range’
Line 166. ‘Renowned DIAL equation’. Suggest changing to ’well-known DIAL equation’
Line 281. ‘Surpassing the lidar’. Suggest “passing over the lidar”
Line 336 and 633. Straight forward should be one word, straightforward
Line 370 ‘Supersaturated’. Not a good word choice in English for this condition. Is it something in the electronic gain saturated or perhaps a non-linear response of the detector (perhaps some combination of both?). Suggest ‘saturated non-linear response’
Line 379 ‘Spread is weaker’. Suggest ‘spread is reduced’
Line 621. 40 min hour. It seems the word hour is unintended
Line 636 and line 675. ‘Shreds of clouds’. Suggest ‘wisps of clouds’
Line 639 ‘Such flags have not been set in the corresponding time’, Unclear what meaning is desired here.
Line 644 ‘Proof’ is the wrong word. Use ’prove’
Line 663 ‘Interludes’: Suggest ‘portions’. Actually the spectrum doesn’t agree well beyond at time scales longer than approximately 1 minute