Articles | Volume 18, issue 19
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4923-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4923-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
30 Sep 2025
Research article |
| 30 Sep 2025
| 30 Sep 2025
The ATMONSYS water vapor DIAL: advanced measurements of short-term variability in the planetary boundary layer
Johannes Speidel
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research Atmospheric Environmental Research (IMK-IFU), Campus Alpin, 82467 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany
Hannes Vogelmann
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research Atmospheric Environmental Research (IMK-IFU), Campus Alpin, 82467 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany
Andreas Behrendt
Institute of Physics and Meteorology (IPM), University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
Diego Lange
Institute of Physics and Meteorology (IPM), University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
Matthias Mauder
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research Atmospheric Environmental Research (IMK-IFU), Campus Alpin, 82467 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany
Dresden University of Technology (TUD), Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Institute of Hydrology and Meteorology, 01737 Tharandt, Germany
Jens Reichardt
Richard-Aßmann-Observatorium, Deutscher Wetterdienst, 15848 Lindenberg, Germany
Kevin Wolz
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research Atmospheric Environmental Research (IMK-IFU), Campus Alpin, 82467 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany
Dresden University of Technology (TUD), Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Institute of Hydrology and Meteorology, 01737 Tharandt, Germany
Related authors
No articles found.
Ann-Kristin Kunz, Samuel Hammer, Patrick Aigner, Laura Bignotti, Lars Borchardt, Jia Chen, Julian Della Coletta, Lukas Emmenegger, Markus Eritt, Xochilt Gutiérrez, Josh Hashemi, Rainer Hilland, Christopher Holst, Armin Jordan, Natascha Kljun, Richard Kneißl, Changxing Lan, Virgile Legendre, Ingeborg Levin, Benjamin Loubet, Matthias Mauder, Betty Molinier, Susanne Preunkert, Michel Ramonet, Stavros Stagakis, and Andreas Christen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4856, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4856, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
We present radiocarbon (14C)-based fossil fuel CO2 fluxes from relaxed eddy accumulation measurements on tall towers in the cities of Zurich, Paris, and Munich. By separating net CO2 fluxes into fossil and non-fossil components, these data reveal significant and variable contributions from human, plant, and soil respiration, as well as point-source emissions. These unique insights into CO2 flux composition offer crucial information for observation-based validation of urban emission estimates.
Linus von Klitzing, David D. Turner, Diego Lange, and Volker Wulfmeyer
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2101, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2101, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Short summary
Short summary
Many atmospheric science endeavors require temporally resolved profiles of temperature, humidity, and winds. Radiosondes are considered the gold standard for measuring these profiles, but the temporal resolution is frequently too coarse for many applications within the atmospheric boundary layer. This study proposes a new method using a normalized height grid in the temporal interpolation process that yields more accurate profiles in the convective boundary layer.
Thomas Trickl, Hannes Vogelmann, Michael Bittner, Gerald Nedoluha, Carsten Schmidt, Wolfgang Steinbrecht, and Sabine Wüst
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1952, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1952, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
A powerful lidar system has been installed at the high-altitude observatory Schneefernerhaus (2575 m) to allow for atmospheric temperature measurements up to more than 80 km within just one hour. The temperature profiles are calibrated by values obtained from chemiluminscence of the hydroxyl radical around 86 km. The temperature profiles are successfully compared with satellite and lidar data.
Rico Kronenberg, Ivan Vorobevskii, Thi Thanh Luong, Uwe Spank, Dongkyun Kim, and Matthias Mauder
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2084, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2084, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
We developed an improved model to better understand how water and energy move through natural landscapes (forest, grasslands, croplands, etc) throughout the day. By using detailed data from study-site in Germany, we tested the model and found its good agreement with micro-meteorological measurements. Unlike many other tools, this model works without needing new adjustments and offers a powerful way to study fast-changing water processes in different environments.
Jens Reichardt, Felix Lauermann, and Oliver Behrendt
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 5857–5892, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5857-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5857-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Optical remote sensing systems, so-called lidars, are used to learn more about aerosols, which play an important role in atmospheric processes. The present study demonstrates that lidars, which measure the backscattering behavior of aerosols over the entire visible wavelength range, can increase our knowledge of the spatial and temporal occurrence of aerosol layers, the type of aerosol, and their interaction with clouds. The focus of the publication is on wildfire aerosol and Saharan dust.
Stefanie Fischer, Ronald Queck, Christian Bernhofer, and Matthias Mauder
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2118, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2118, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate estimates of interception are important to assess the water availability in ecosystems. We analyzed rainfall interception for a forest site from plot to stand scale. During interception, eddy-covariance measurements of evaporation were systematically underestimated accounting for 24% of precipitation, while modelled interception evaporation accounted for 45%. As a consequence, we developed a hybrid correction approach to fit the evaporation data to both the energy and the water balance.
Pascal Hedelt, Jens Reichardt, Felix Lauermann, Benjamin Weiß, Nicolas Theys, Alberto Redondas, Africa Barreto, Omaira Garcia, and Diego Loyola
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 1253–1272, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1253-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1253-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The 2021 volcanic eruption of Tajogaite on La Palma is investigated using ground-based and satellite measurements. In addition, the atmospheric transport of the volcanic cloud towards Europe is studied in detail. The amount of SO2 released during the eruption and the height of the volcanic plume are in excellent agreement among the different measurements. Furthermore, volcanic aerosol microphysical properties could be retrieved using a new retrieval approach based on lidar measurements.
Syed Saqlain Abbas, Andreas Behrendt, Oliver Branch, and Volker Wulfmeyer
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3878, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3878, 2024
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates turbulence statistics convective boundary layer. For this, we used data of two Doppler lidars, and an eddy covariance station between May to July 2021. We believe that these statistics are important to improve the land-atmosphere characterization in numerical weather prediction models.
José Alex Zenteno-Hernández, Adolfo Comerón, Federico Dios, Alejandro Rodríguez-Gómez, Constantino Muñoz-Porcar, Michaël Sicard, Noemi Franco, Andreas Behrendt, and Paolo Di Girolamo
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4687–4694, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4687-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4687-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We study how the spectral characteristics of a solid-state laser in an atmospheric temperature profiling lidar using the Raman technique impact the temperature retrieval accuracy. We find that the spectral widening, with respect to a seeded laser, has virtually no impact, while crystal-rod temperature variations in the laser must be kept within a range of 1 K for the uncertainty in the atmospheric temperature below 1 K. The study is carried out through spectroscopy simulations.
Kevin Wolz, Christopher Holst, Frank Beyrich, Eileen Päschke, and Matthias Mauder
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 205–223, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-205-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-205-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We compared wind measurements using different lidar setups at various heights. The triple Doppler lidar, sonic anemometer, and two single Doppler lidars were tested. Overall, the lidar methods showed good agreement with the sonic anemometer. The triple Doppler lidar performed better than single Doppler lidars, especially at higher altitudes. We also developed a new filtering approach for virtual tower scanning strategies. Single Doppler lidars provide reliable wind data over flat terrain.
Changxing Lan, Matthias Mauder, Stavros Stagakis, Benjamin Loubet, Claudio D'Onofrio, Stefan Metzger, David Durden, and Pedro-Henrique Herig-Coimbra
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2649–2669, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2649-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2649-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Using eddy-covariance systems deployed in three cities, we aimed to elucidate the sources of discrepancies in flux estimations from different software packages. One crucial finding is the impact of low-frequency spectral loss corrections on tall-tower flux estimations. Our findings emphasize the significance of a standardized measurement setup and consistent postprocessing configurations in minimizing the systematic flux uncertainty resulting from the usage of different software packages.
Sinikka J. Paulus, Rene Orth, Sung-Ching Lee, Anke Hildebrandt, Martin Jung, Jacob A. Nelson, Tarek Sebastian El-Madany, Arnaud Carrara, Gerardo Moreno, Matthias Mauder, Jannis Groh, Alexander Graf, Markus Reichstein, and Mirco Migliavacca
Biogeosciences, 21, 2051–2085, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2051-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2051-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Porous materials are known to reversibly trap water from the air, even at low humidity. However, this behavior is poorly understood for soils. In this analysis, we test whether eddy covariance is able to measure the so-called adsorption of atmospheric water vapor by soils. We find that this flux occurs frequently during dry nights in a Mediterranean ecosystem, while EC detects downwardly directed vapor fluxes. These results can help to map moisture uptake globally.
Volker Wulfmeyer, Christoph Senff, Florian Späth, Andreas Behrendt, Diego Lange, Robert M. Banta, W. Alan Brewer, Andreas Wieser, and David D. Turner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1175–1196, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1175-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1175-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A simultaneous deployment of Doppler, temperature, and water-vapor lidar systems is used to provide profiles of molecular destruction rates and turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) dissipation in the convective boundary layer (CBL). The results can be used for the parameterization of turbulent variables, TKE budget analyses, and the verification of weather forecast and climate models.
Thomas Trickl, Hannes Vogelmann, Michael D. Fromm, Horst Jäger, Matthias Perfahl, and Wolfgang Steinbrecht
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 1997–2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1997-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1997-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In 2023, the lidar team at Garmisch-Partenkirchen (Germany) celebrated its 50th year of aerosol profiling. The highlight of these activities has been the lidar measurements of stratospheric aerosol carried out since 1976. The observations since 2017 are characterized by severe smoke from several big fires in North America and Siberia and three volcanic eruptions. The sudden increase in the frequency of such strong fire events is difficult to understand.
Sreenath Paleri, Luise Wanner, Matthias Sühring, Ankur Desai, and Matthias Mauder
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1721, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1721, 2023
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
We present a description and evaluation of numerical simulations of field experiment days during the CHEESEHEAD19 field campaign, conducted over a heterogeneous forested domain in Northern Wisconsin, USA. Diurnal simulations, informed and constrained by field measurements for two days during the summer and autumn were performed. The model could simulate near surface time series and profiles of atmospheric state variables and fluxes that matched relatively well with observations.
Thomas Trickl, Martin Adelwart, Dina Khordakova, Ludwig Ries, Christian Rolf, Michael Sprenger, Wolfgang Steinbrecht, and Hannes Vogelmann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 5145–5165, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5145-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5145-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Tropospheric ozone have been measured for more than a century. Highly quantitative ozone measurements have been made at monitoring stations. However, deficits have been reported for vertical sounding systems. Here, we report a thorough intercomparison effort between a differential-absorption lidar system and two types of balloon-borne ozone sondes, also using ozone sensors at nearby mountain sites as references. The sondes agree very well with the lidar after offset corrections.
Thomas Trickl, Cédric Couret, Ludwig Ries, and Hannes Vogelmann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 8403–8427, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8403-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8403-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Downward atmospheric transport from the stratosphere (STT) is the most important natural source of tropospheric ozone. We analyse the stratospheric influence on the long-term series of ozone and carbon monoxide measured on the Zugspitze in the Bavarian Alps (2962 m a.s.l.). Since the 1970s, there has been a pronounced ozone rise that has been ascribed to an increase in STT. We determine the stratospheric influence from the observational data alone (humidity and 7Be).
Peng Yuan, Roeland Van Malderen, Xungang Yin, Hannes Vogelmann, Weiping Jiang, Joseph Awange, Bernhard Heck, and Hansjörg Kutterer
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 3517–3541, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3517-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3517-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Water vapour plays an important role in various weather and climate processes. However, due to its large spatiotemporal variability, its high-accuracy quantification remains a challenge. In this study, 20+ years of GPS-derived integrated water vapour (IWV) retrievals in Europe were obtained. They were then used to characterise the temporal features of Europe's IWV and assess six atmospheric reanalyses. Results show that ERA5 outperforms the other reanalyses at most temporal scales.
Florian Späth, Verena Rajtschan, Tobias K. D. Weber, Shehan Morandage, Diego Lange, Syed Saqlain Abbas, Andreas Behrendt, Joachim Ingwersen, Thilo Streck, and Volker Wulfmeyer
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 12, 25–44, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-25-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-25-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Important topics in land–atmosphere feedback research are water and energy balances and heterogeneities of fluxes at the land surface and in the atmosphere. To target these questions, the Land–Atmosphere Feedback Observatory (LAFO) has been installed in Germany. The instrumentation allows for comprehensive measurements from the bedrock to the troposphere. The LAFO observation strategy aims for simultaneous measurements in all three compartments: atmosphere, soil and land surface, and vegetation.
Jens Reichardt, Oliver Behrendt, and Felix Lauermann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-1-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-1-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The UVA spectrometer is the latest instrumental addition to the spectrometric fluorescence and Raman lidar RAMSES. The redesigned receiver and the data analysis of the fluorescence measurement are described. Furthermore, the effect of aerosol fluorescence on humidity measurements is studied. It turns out that Raman lidars equipped with a spectrometer show superior performance over those with one discrete fluorescence detection channel only. The cause is variability in the fluorescence spectrum.
Chang-Hwan Park, Aaron Berg, Michael H. Cosh, Andreas Colliander, Andreas Behrendt, Hida Manns, Jinkyu Hong, Johan Lee, Runze Zhang, and Volker Wulfmeyer
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 6407–6420, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-6407-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-6407-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we proposed an inversion of the dielectric mixing model for a 50 Hz soil sensor for agricultural organic soil. This model can reflect the variability of soil organic matter (SOM) in wilting point and porosity, which play a critical role in improving the accuracy of SM estimation, using a dielectric-based soil sensor. The results of statistical analyses demonstrated a higher performance of the new model than the factory setting probe algorithm.
Matthias Mauder, Andreas Ibrom, Luise Wanner, Frederik De Roo, Peter Brugger, Ralf Kiese, and Kim Pilegaard
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7835–7850, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7835-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7835-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Turbulent flux measurements suffer from a general systematic underestimation. One reason for this bias is non-local transport by large-scale circulations. A recently developed model for this additional transport of sensible and latent energy is evaluated for three different test sites. Different options on how to apply this correction are presented, and the results are evaluated against independent measurements.
Stefan Metzger, David Durden, Sreenath Paleri, Matthias Sühring, Brian J. Butterworth, Christopher Florian, Matthias Mauder, David M. Plummer, Luise Wanner, Ke Xu, and Ankur R. Desai
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6929–6954, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6929-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6929-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The key points are the following. (i) Integrative observing system design can multiply the information gain of surface–atmosphere field measurements. (ii) Catalyzing numerical simulations and first-principles machine learning open up observing system simulation experiments to novel applications. (iii) Use cases include natural climate solutions, emission inventory validation, urban air quality, and industry leak detection.
Bjorn Stevens, Sandrine Bony, David Farrell, Felix Ament, Alan Blyth, Christopher Fairall, Johannes Karstensen, Patricia K. Quinn, Sabrina Speich, Claudia Acquistapace, Franziska Aemisegger, Anna Lea Albright, Hugo Bellenger, Eberhard Bodenschatz, Kathy-Ann Caesar, Rebecca Chewitt-Lucas, Gijs de Boer, Julien Delanoë, Leif Denby, Florian Ewald, Benjamin Fildier, Marvin Forde, Geet George, Silke Gross, Martin Hagen, Andrea Hausold, Karen J. Heywood, Lutz Hirsch, Marek Jacob, Friedhelm Jansen, Stefan Kinne, Daniel Klocke, Tobias Kölling, Heike Konow, Marie Lothon, Wiebke Mohr, Ann Kristin Naumann, Louise Nuijens, Léa Olivier, Robert Pincus, Mira Pöhlker, Gilles Reverdin, Gregory Roberts, Sabrina Schnitt, Hauke Schulz, A. Pier Siebesma, Claudia Christine Stephan, Peter Sullivan, Ludovic Touzé-Peiffer, Jessica Vial, Raphaela Vogel, Paquita Zuidema, Nicola Alexander, Lyndon Alves, Sophian Arixi, Hamish Asmath, Gholamhossein Bagheri, Katharina Baier, Adriana Bailey, Dariusz Baranowski, Alexandre Baron, Sébastien Barrau, Paul A. Barrett, Frédéric Batier, Andreas Behrendt, Arne Bendinger, Florent Beucher, Sebastien Bigorre, Edmund Blades, Peter Blossey, Olivier Bock, Steven Böing, Pierre Bosser, Denis Bourras, Pascale Bouruet-Aubertot, Keith Bower, Pierre Branellec, Hubert Branger, Michal Brennek, Alan Brewer, Pierre-Etienne Brilouet, Björn Brügmann, Stefan A. Buehler, Elmo Burke, Ralph Burton, Radiance Calmer, Jean-Christophe Canonici, Xavier Carton, Gregory Cato Jr., Jude Andre Charles, Patrick Chazette, Yanxu Chen, Michal T. Chilinski, Thomas Choularton, Patrick Chuang, Shamal Clarke, Hugh Coe, Céline Cornet, Pierre Coutris, Fleur Couvreux, Susanne Crewell, Timothy Cronin, Zhiqiang Cui, Yannis Cuypers, Alton Daley, Gillian M. Damerell, Thibaut Dauhut, Hartwig Deneke, Jean-Philippe Desbios, Steffen Dörner, Sebastian Donner, Vincent Douet, Kyla Drushka, Marina Dütsch, André Ehrlich, Kerry Emanuel, Alexandros Emmanouilidis, Jean-Claude Etienne, Sheryl Etienne-Leblanc, Ghislain Faure, Graham Feingold, Luca Ferrero, Andreas Fix, Cyrille Flamant, Piotr Jacek Flatau, Gregory R. Foltz, Linda Forster, Iulian Furtuna, Alan Gadian, Joseph Galewsky, Martin Gallagher, Peter Gallimore, Cassandra Gaston, Chelle Gentemann, Nicolas Geyskens, Andreas Giez, John Gollop, Isabelle Gouirand, Christophe Gourbeyre, Dörte de Graaf, Geiske E. de Groot, Robert Grosz, Johannes Güttler, Manuel Gutleben, Kashawn Hall, George Harris, Kevin C. Helfer, Dean Henze, Calvert Herbert, Bruna Holanda, Antonio Ibanez-Landeta, Janet Intrieri, Suneil Iyer, Fabrice Julien, Heike Kalesse, Jan Kazil, Alexander Kellman, Abiel T. Kidane, Ulrike Kirchner, Marcus Klingebiel, Mareike Körner, Leslie Ann Kremper, Jan Kretzschmar, Ovid Krüger, Wojciech Kumala, Armin Kurz, Pierre L'Hégaret, Matthieu Labaste, Tom Lachlan-Cope, Arlene Laing, Peter Landschützer, Theresa Lang, Diego Lange, Ingo Lange, Clément Laplace, Gauke Lavik, Rémi Laxenaire, Caroline Le Bihan, Mason Leandro, Nathalie Lefevre, Marius Lena, Donald Lenschow, Qiang Li, Gary Lloyd, Sebastian Los, Niccolò Losi, Oscar Lovell, Christopher Luneau, Przemyslaw Makuch, Szymon Malinowski, Gaston Manta, Eleni Marinou, Nicholas Marsden, Sebastien Masson, Nicolas Maury, Bernhard Mayer, Margarette Mayers-Als, Christophe Mazel, Wayne McGeary, James C. McWilliams, Mario Mech, Melina Mehlmann, Agostino Niyonkuru Meroni, Theresa Mieslinger, Andreas Minikin, Peter Minnett, Gregor Möller, Yanmichel Morfa Avalos, Caroline Muller, Ionela Musat, Anna Napoli, Almuth Neuberger, Christophe Noisel, David Noone, Freja Nordsiek, Jakub L. Nowak, Lothar Oswald, Douglas J. Parker, Carolyn Peck, Renaud Person, Miriam Philippi, Albert Plueddemann, Christopher Pöhlker, Veronika Pörtge, Ulrich Pöschl, Lawrence Pologne, Michał Posyniak, Marc Prange, Estefanía Quiñones Meléndez, Jule Radtke, Karim Ramage, Jens Reimann, Lionel Renault, Klaus Reus, Ashford Reyes, Joachim Ribbe, Maximilian Ringel, Markus Ritschel, Cesar B. Rocha, Nicolas Rochetin, Johannes Röttenbacher, Callum Rollo, Haley Royer, Pauline Sadoulet, Leo Saffin, Sanola Sandiford, Irina Sandu, Michael Schäfer, Vera Schemann, Imke Schirmacher, Oliver Schlenczek, Jerome Schmidt, Marcel Schröder, Alfons Schwarzenboeck, Andrea Sealy, Christoph J. Senff, Ilya Serikov, Samkeyat Shohan, Elizabeth Siddle, Alexander Smirnov, Florian Späth, Branden Spooner, M. Katharina Stolla, Wojciech Szkółka, Simon P. de Szoeke, Stéphane Tarot, Eleni Tetoni, Elizabeth Thompson, Jim Thomson, Lorenzo Tomassini, Julien Totems, Alma Anna Ubele, Leonie Villiger, Jan von Arx, Thomas Wagner, Andi Walther, Ben Webber, Manfred Wendisch, Shanice Whitehall, Anton Wiltshire, Allison A. Wing, Martin Wirth, Jonathan Wiskandt, Kevin Wolf, Ludwig Worbes, Ethan Wright, Volker Wulfmeyer, Shanea Young, Chidong Zhang, Dongxiao Zhang, Florian Ziemen, Tobias Zinner, and Martin Zöger
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4067–4119, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4067-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4067-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The EUREC4A field campaign, designed to test hypothesized mechanisms by which clouds respond to warming and benchmark next-generation Earth-system models, is presented. EUREC4A comprised roughly 5 weeks of measurements in the downstream winter trades of the North Atlantic – eastward and southeastward of Barbados. It was the first campaign that attempted to characterize the full range of processes and scales influencing trade wind clouds.
Harald Rybka, Ulrike Burkhardt, Martin Köhler, Ioanna Arka, Luca Bugliaro, Ulrich Görsdorf, Ákos Horváth, Catrin I. Meyer, Jens Reichardt, Axel Seifert, and Johan Strandgren
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 4285–4318, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4285-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4285-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Estimating the impact of convection on the upper-tropospheric water budget remains a problem for models employing resolutions of several kilometers or more. A sub-kilometer high-resolution model is used to study summertime convection. The results suggest mostly close agreement with ground- and satellite-based observational data while slightly overestimating total frozen water path and anvil lifetime. The simulations are well suited to supplying information for parameterization development.
Basit Khan, Sabine Banzhaf, Edward C. Chan, Renate Forkel, Farah Kanani-Sühring, Klaus Ketelsen, Mona Kurppa, Björn Maronga, Matthias Mauder, Siegfried Raasch, Emmanuele Russo, Martijn Schaap, and Matthias Sühring
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1171–1193, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1171-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1171-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
An atmospheric chemistry model has been implemented in the microscale PALM model system 6.0. This article provides a detailed description of the model, its structure, input requirements, various features and limitations. Several pre-compiled ready-to-use chemical mechanisms are included in the chemistry model code; however, users can also easily implement other mechanisms. A case study is presented to demonstrate the application of the new chemistry model in the urban environment.
Lisa Klanner, Katharina Höveler, Dina Khordakova, Matthias Perfahl, Christian Rolf, Thomas Trickl, and Hannes Vogelmann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 531–555, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-531-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-531-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The importance of water vapour as the most influential greenhouse gas and for air composition calls for detailed investigations. The details of the highly inhomogeneous distribution of water vapour can be determined with lidar, the very low concentrations at high altitudes imposing a major challenge. An existing water-vapour lidar in the Bavarian Alps was recently complemented by a powerful Raman lidar that provides water vapour up to 20 km and temperature up to 90 km within just 1 h.
Thomas Trickl, Helmuth Giehl, Frank Neidl, Matthias Perfahl, and Hannes Vogelmann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 6357–6390, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6357-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6357-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Lidar sounding of ozone and other atmospheric constituents has proved to be an invaluable tool for atmospheric studies. The ozone lidar systems developed at Garmisch-Partenkirchen have reached an accuracy level almost matching that of in situ sensors. Since the late 1990s numerous important scientific discoveries have been made, such as the first observation of intercontinental transport of ozone and the very high occurrence of intrusions of stratospheric air into the troposphere.
Cited articles
Ansmann, A.: Errors in ground-based water-vapor DIAL measurements due to Doppler-broadened Rayleigh backscattering, Appl. Optics, 24, 3476–3480, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.24.003476, 1985. a
Ansmann, A. and Bosenberg, J.: Correction scheme for spectral broadening by Rayleigh scattering in differential absorption lidar measurements of water vapor in the troposphere, Appl. Optics, 26, 3026–3032, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.26.003026, 1987. a
Baars, H., Ansmann, A., Engelmann, R., and Althausen, D.: Continuous monitoring of the boundary-layer top with lidar, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 7281–7296, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-7281-2008, 2008. a
Bailén, F. J., Suárez, D. O., and Iniesta, J. C. d. T.: On Fabry Pérot etalon based instruments. I. The isotropic case, Astrophys. J. Suppl. S., 241, 9, https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/aafdb3, 2019. a
Behrendt, A., Wulfmeyer, V., Bauer, H.-S., Schaberl, T., Girolamo, P. D., Summa, D., Kiemle, C., Ehret, G., Whiteman, D. N., Demoz, B. B., Browell, E. V., Ismail, S., Ferrare, R., Kooi, S., and Wang, J.: Intercomparison of water vapor data measured with lidar during IHOP_2002. Part I: Airborne to ground-based lidar systems and comparisons with chilled-mirror hygrometer radiosondes, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 24, 3–21, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH1924.1, 2007a. a
Behrendt, A., Wulfmeyer, V., Schaberl, T., Bauer, H.-S., Kiemle, C., Ehret, G., Flamant, C., Kooi, S., Ismail, S., Ferrare, R., Browell, E. V., and Whiteman, D. N.: Intercomparison of water vapor data measured with lidar during IHOP_2002. Part II: Airborne-to-airborne systems, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 24, 22–39, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH1925.1, 2007b. a
Behrendt, A., Pal, S., Aoshima, F., Bender, M., Blyth, A., Corsmeier, U., Cuesta, J., Dick, G., Dorninger, M., Flamant, C., Di Girolamo, P., Gorgas, T., Huang, Y., Kalthoff, N., Khodayar, S., Mannstein, H., Träumner, K., Wieser, A., and Wulfmeyer, V.: Observation of convection initiation processes with a suite of state-of-the-art research instruments during COPS IOP 8b, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 81–100, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.758, 2011. a
Behrendt, A., Wulfmeyer, V., Hammann, E., Muppa, S. K., and Pal, S.: Profiles of second- to fourth-order moments of turbulent temperature fluctuations in the convective boundary layer: first measurements with rotational Raman lidar, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5485–5500, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5485-2015, 2015. a
Behrendt, A., Wulfmeyer, V., Senff, C., Muppa, S. K., Späth, F., Lange, D., Kalthoff, N., and Wieser, A.: Observation of sensible and latent heat flux profiles with lidar, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3221–3233, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3221-2020, 2020. a
Bhawar, R., Di Girolamo, P., Summa, D., Flamant, C., Althausen, D., Behrendt, A., Kiemle, C., Bosser, P., Cacciani, M., Champollion, C., Di Iorio, T., Engelmann, R., Herold, C., Müller, D., Pal, S., Wirth, M., and Wulfmeyer, V.: The water vapour intercomparison effort in the framework of the convective and orographically-induced precipitation study: airborne-to-ground-based and airborne-to-airborne lidar systems, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 325–348, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.697, 2011. a
Bösenberg, J.: Ground-based differential absorption lidar for water-vapor and temperature profiling: methodology, Appl. Optics, 37, 3845–3860, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.37.003845, 1998. a, b, c, d
Browell, E. V., Wilkerson, T. D., and Mcilrath, T. J.: Water vapor differential absorption lidar development and evaluation, Appl. Optics, 18, 3474–3483, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.18.003474, 1979. a
Brugger, P., Träumner, K., and Jung, C.: Evaluation of a procedure to correct spatial averaging in turbulence statistics from a Doppler lidar by comparing time series with an ultrasonic anemometer, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 33, 2135–2144, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-15-0136.1, 2016. a, b
Butterworth, B. J., Desai, A. R., Townsend, P. A., Petty, G. W., Andresen, C. G., Bertram, T. H., Kruger, E. L., Mineau, J. K., Olson, E. R., Paleri, S., Pertzborn, R. A., Pettersen, C., Stoy, P. C., Thom, J. E., Vermeuel, M. P., Wagner, T. J., Wright, D. B., Zheng, T., Metzger, S., Schwartz, M. D., Iglinski, T. J., Mauder, M., Speidel, J., Vogelmann, H., Wanner, L., Augustine, T. J., Brown, W. O. J., Oncley, S. P., Buban, M., Lee, T. R., Cleary, P., Durden, D. J., Florian, C. R., Lantz, K., Riihimaki, L. D., Sedlar, J., Meyers, T. P., Plummer, D. M., Guzman, E. R., Smith, E. N., Sühring, M., Turner, D. D., Wang, Z., White, L. D., and Wilczak, J. M.: Connecting land–atmosphere interactions to surface heterogeneity in CHEESEHEAD19, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 102, E421–E445, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0346.1, 2021. a
Couvreux, F., Guichard, F., Redelsperger, J.-L., Kiemle, C., Masson, V., Lafore, J.-P., and Flamant, C.: Water-vapour variability within a convective boundary-layer assessed by large-eddy simulations and IHOP_2002 observations, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 2665–2693, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.167, 2005. a
Davis, K. J., Bakwin, P. S., Yi, C., Berger, B. W., Zhao, C., Teclaw, R. M., and Isebrands, J. G.: The annual cycles of CO2 and H2O exchange over a northern mixed forest as observed from a very tall tower, Glob. Change Biol., 9, 1278–1293, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00672.x, 2003. a
Ehret, G., Giez, A., Kiemle, C., Davis, K., Lenschow, D., Oncley, S., and Kelly, R.: Airborne water vapor DIAL and in situ observations of a sea-land interface, Contributions to Atmospheric Physics, 69, 215–228, 1996. a
Ertel, K.: Application and Development of Water Vapor DIAL Systems, PhD thesis, University of Hamburg, https://pure.mpg.de/pubman/faces/ViewItemOverviewPage.jsp?itemId=item_995191 (last access: 9 September 2025), 2004. a
Ferrare, R. A., Melfi, S. H., Whiteman, D. N., Evans, K. D., Schmidlin, F. J., and Starr, D. O.: A comparison of water vapor measurements made by Raman lidar and radiosondes, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 12, 1177–1195, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1995)012<1177:ACOWVM>2.0.CO;2, 1995. a
Foken, T.: Micrometeorology, SpringerLink, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2nd edn., https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25440-6, 2017. a, b
Foskinis, R., Gao, K., Gini, M. I., Diapouli, E., Vratolis, S., Granakis, K., Zografou, O., Kokkalis, P., Komppula, M., Vakkari, V., Eleftheriadis, K., Nenes, A., and Papayannis, A.: The influence of the planetary boundary layer on the atmospheric state at an orographic site at the Eastern Mediterranean, Tellus B, 76, 19–31, https://doi.org/10.16993/tellusb.1876, 2024. a
Fratini, G., Ibrom, A., Arriga, N., Burba, G., and Papale, D.: Relative humidity effects on water vapour fluxes measured with closed-path eddy-covariance systems with short sampling lines, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 165, 53–63, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.05.018, 2012. a
Hayman, M., Stillwell, R. A., Karboski, A., Marais, W. J., and Spuler, S. M.: Global estimation of range resolved thermodynamic profiles from micropulse differential absorption lidar, Optics Express, 32, 14442–14460, https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.521178, 2024. a
Helbig, M., Gerken, T., Beamesderfer, E. R., Baldocchi, D. D., Banerjee, T., Biraud, S. C., Brown, W. O. J., Brunsell, N. A., Burakowski, E. A., Burns, S. P., Butterworth, B. J., Chan, W. S., Davis, K. J., Desai, A. R., Fuentes, J. D., Hollinger, D. Y., Kljun, N., Mauder, M., Novick, K. A., Perkins, J. M., Rahn, D. A., Rey-Sanchez, C., Santanello, J. A., Scott, R. L., Seyednasrollah, B., Stoy, P. C., Sullivan, R. C., de Arellano, J. V.-G., Wharton, S., Yi, C., and Richardson, A. D.: Integrating continuous atmospheric boundary layer and tower-based flux measurements to advance understanding of land-atmosphere interactions, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 307, 108509, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108509, 2021. a
Held, I. M. and Soden, B. J.: Water vapor feedback and global warming, Annu. Rev. Energ. Env., 25, 441–475, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.441, 2000. a
Hicks-Jalali, S., Sica, R. J., Martucci, G., Maillard Barras, E., Voirin, J., and Haefele, A.: A Raman lidar tropospheric water vapour climatology and height-resolved trend analysis over Payerne, Switzerland, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9619–9640, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9619-2020, 2020. a
Hohenegger, C., Ament, F., Beyrich, F., Löhnert, U., Rust, H., Bange, J., Böck, T., Böttcher, C., Boventer, J., Burgemeister, F., Clemens, M., Detring, C., Detring, I., Dewani, N., Duran, I. B., Fiedler, S., Göber, M., van Heerwaarden, C., Heusinkveld, B., Kirsch, B., Klocke, D., Knist, C., Lange, I., Lauermann, F., Lehmann, V., Lehmke, J., Leinweber, R., Lundgren, K., Masbou, M., Mauder, M., Mol, W., Nevermann, H., Nomokonova, T., Päschke, E., Platis, A., Reichardt, J., Rochette, L., Sakradzija, M., Schlemmer, L., Schmidli, J., Shokri, N., Sobottke, V., Speidel, J., Steinheuer, J., Turner, D. D., Vogelmann, H., Wedemeyer, C., Weide-Luiz, E., Wiesner, S., Wildmann, N., Wolz, K., and Wetz, T.: FESSTVaL: the field experiment on submesoscale spatio-temporal variability in Lindenberg, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 104, E1875–E1892, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0330.1, 2023. a, b, c, d
Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change: Climate Change 2021 – The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, 1st edn., https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896, 2021. a
Kaimal, J. C. and Finnigan, J. J.: Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flows: Their Structure and Measurement, Oxford University Press, New York, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195062397.001.0001, 1994. a
Klanner, L., Höveler, K., Khordakova, D., Perfahl, M., Rolf, C., Trickl, T., and Vogelmann, H.: A powerful lidar system capable of 1 h measurements of water vapour in the troposphere and the lower stratosphere as well as the temperature in the upper stratosphere and mesosphere, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 531–555, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-531-2021, 2021. a
Klett, J. D.: Lidar inversion with variable backscatter/extinction ratios, Appl. Optics, 24, 1638–1643, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.24.001638, 1985. a, b
Kolmogorov, A.: The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large reynolds numbers, P. Roy. Soc. A-Math. Phy., 434, 9–13, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1991.0075, 1991. a
Kotthaus, S., Bravo-Aranda, J. A., Collaud Coen, M., Guerrero-Rascado, J. L., Costa, M. J., Cimini, D., O'Connor, E. J., Hervo, M., Alados-Arboledas, L., Jiménez-Portaz, M., Mona, L., Ruffieux, D., Illingworth, A., and Haeffelin, M.: Atmospheric boundary layer height from ground-based remote sensing: a review of capabilities and limitations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 433–479, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-433-2023, 2023. a
Kröniger, K., Katul, G. G., Roo, F. D., Brugger, P., and Mauder, M.: Aerodynamic resistance parameterization for heterogeneous surfaces using a covariance function approach in spectral space, J. Atmos. Sci.,J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 3191–3209, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0150.1, 2019. a, b
Lange, D., Behrendt, A., and Wulfmeyer, V.: Compact operational tropospheric water vapor and temperature Raman Lidar with turbulence resolution, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 14844–14853, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085774, 2019. a
Lenschow, D. H., Wulfmeyer, V., and Senff, C.: Measuring second- through fourth-order moments in noisy data, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 17, 1330–1347, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2000)017<1330:MSTFOM>2.0.CO;2, 2000. a, b
Mahrt, L.: Surface heterogeneity and vertical structure of the boundary layer, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 96, 33–62, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002482332477, 2000. a
Mauder, M., Jegede, O. O., Okogbue, E. C., Wimmer, F., and Foken, T.: Surface energy balance measurements at a tropical site in West Africa during the transition from dry to wet season, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 89, 171–183, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-006-0252-6, 2007. a, b
Mauder, M., Eggert, M., Gutsmuths, C., Oertel, S., Wilhelm, P., Voelksch, I., Wanner, L., Tambke, J., and Bogoev, I.: Comparison of turbulence measurements by a CSAT3B sonic anemometer and a high-resolution bistatic Doppler lidar, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 969–983, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-969-2020, 2020a. a, b, c
Mauder, M., Foken, T., and Cuxart, J.: Surface-energy-balance closure over land: a review, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 177, 395–426, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-020-00529-6, 2020b. a, b
Moncrieff, J. B., Massheder, J. M., de Bruin, H., Elbers, J., Friborg, T., Heusinkveld, B., Kabat, P., Scott, S., Soegaard, H., and Verhoef, A.: A system to measure surface fluxes of momentum, sensible heat, water vapour and carbon dioxide, J. Hydrol., 188–189, 589–611, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03194-0, 1997. a
Muppa, S. K., Behrendt, A., Späth, F., Wulfmeyer, V., Metzendorf, S., and Riede, A.: Turbulent humidity fluctuations in the convective boundary layer: case studies using water vapour differential absorption lidar measurements, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 158, 43–66, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-015-0078-9, 2016. a, b
Penney, C. M., St. peters, R. L., and Lapp, M.: Absolute Intensity and Polarization of Rotational Raman Scattering from N2, O2, and CO2, Tech. Rep. NASA-CR-121091, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19730009019 (last access: 9 September 2025), 1973. a
Ponsardin, P. L. and Browell, E. V.: Measurements of
Puccioni, M. and Iungo, G. V.: Spectral correction of turbulent energy damping on wind lidar measurements due to spatial averaging, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 1457–1474, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1457-2021, 2021. a
Reichardt, J., Wandinger, U., Klein, V., Mattis, I., Hilber, B., and Begbie, R.: RAMSES: German meteorological service autonomous Raman lidar for water vapor, temperature, aerosol, and cloud measurements, Appl. Optics, 51, 8111–8131, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.51.008111, 2012. a, b
Reichardt, J., Behrendt, O., and Lauermann, F.: Spectrometric fluorescence and Raman lidar: absolute calibration of aerosol fluorescence spectra and fluorescence correction of humidity measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-1-2023, 2023. a
Santanello, J. A., Peters-Lidard, C. D., and Kumar, S. V.: Diagnosing the sensitivity of local land–atmosphere coupling via the soil moisture–boundary layer interaction, J. Hydrol., 12, 766–786, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-10-05014.1, 2011. a, b
Schneider, T., O'Gorman, P. A., and Levine, X. J.: Water vapor and the dynamics of climate changes, Rev. Geophys., 48, RG3001, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009RG000302, 2010. a
Schotland, R. M.: Errors in the lidar measurement of atmospheric gases by differential absorption, J. Appl. Meteorol., 13, 71–77, 1974. a
Seibert, P., Beyrich, F., Gryning, S.-E., Joffre, S., Rasmussen, A., and Tercier, P.: Review and intercomparison of operational methods for the determination of the mixing height, Atmos. Environ., 34, 1001–1027, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00349-0, 2000. a
Senff, C., Bösenberg, J., and Peters, G.: Measurement of water vapor flux profiles in the convective boundary layer with lidar and radar-RASS, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 11, 85–93, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1994)011<0085:MOWVFP>2.0.CO;2, 1994. a
Sherwood, S. C., Roca, R., Weckwerth, T. M., and Andronova, N. G.: Tropospheric water vapor, convection, and climate, Rev. Geophys., 48, RG2001, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009RG000301, 2010. a
Späth, F., Behrendt, A., Muppa, S. K., Metzendorf, S., Riede, A., and Wulfmeyer, V.: 3-D water vapor field in the atmospheric boundary layer observed with scanning differential absorption lidar, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 1701–1720, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1701-2016, 2016. a
Späth, F., Behrendt, A., and Wulfmeyer, V.: Minimization of the Rayleigh-Doppler error of differential absorption lidar by frequency tuning: a simulation study, Optics Express, 28, 30324–30339, https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.396568, 2020. a
Speidel, J. and Vogelmann, H.: Correct(ed) Klett–Fernald algorithm for elastic aerosol backscatter retrievals: a sensitivity analysis, Appl. Optics, 62, 861–868, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.465944, 2023. a
Spuler, S. M., Hayman, M., Stillwell, R. A., Carnes, J., Bernatsky, T., and Repasky, K. S.: MicroPulse DIAL (MPD) – a diode-laser-based lidar architecture for quantitative atmospheric profiling, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 4593–4616, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4593-2021, 2021. a
Stillwell, R. A., Spuler, S. M., Hayman, M., Bunn, C. E., and Repasky, K. S.: Towards developing a micropulse differential absorption lidar to measure atmospheric temperature, EPJ Web Conf., 237, 06018, https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202023706018, 2020. a
Stull, R. B.: An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology, vol. 13, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3027-8, 1988. a, b, c, d
Sühring, M. and Raasch, S.: Heterogeneity-induced heat-flux patterns in the convective boundary layer: can they be detected from observations and is there a blending height?—a large-eddy simulation study for the LITFASS-2003 experiment, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 148, 309–331, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-013-9822-1, 2013. a, b
Van Baelen, J. and Penide, G.: Study of water vapor vertical variability and possible cloud formation with a small network of GPS stations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L02804, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036148, 2009. a
Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (VDI): Fernmeßverfahren – Messungen in der Atmosphäre nach dem LIDAR-Prinzip, Tech. rep., Kommission Reinhaltung der Luft (KRdL), https://www.vdi.de/mitgliedschaft/vdi-richtlinien/ (last access: 9 September 2025), 1999. a
Vogelmann, H. and Trickl, T.: Wide-range sounding of free-tropospheric water vapor with a differential-absorption lidar (DIAL) at a high-altitude station, Appl. Optics, 47, 2116–2132, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.47.002116, 2008. a, b, c, d
Vogelmann, H., Sussmann, R., Trickl, T., and Borsdorff, T.: Intercomparison of atmospheric water vapor soundings from the differential absorption lidar (DIAL) and the solar FTIR system on Mt. Zugspitze, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 835–841, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-835-2011, 2011. a
Vogelmann, H., Sussmann, R., Trickl, T., and Reichert, A.: Spatiotemporal variability of water vapor investigated using lidar and FTIR vertical soundings above the Zugspitze, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3135–3148, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3135-2015, 2015. a, b, c
Vogelmann, H., Speidel, J., Perfahl, M., and Trickl, T.: Transverse-pumping approach for a powerful single-mode Ti:sapphire laser for near infrared lidar applications, Appl. Optics, 61, 8553–8562, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.463257, 2022. a, b
Weitkamp, C.: Lidar: Range-resolved Optical Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere, vol. 102 of Springer Series in Optical Sciences, Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/b106786, 2005. a
Wolz, K., Holst, C., Beyrich, F., Päschke, E., and Mauder, M.: Comparing triple and single Doppler lidar wind measurements with sonic anemometer data based on a new filter strategy for virtual tower measurements, Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 205–223, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-205-2024, 2024. a
Wulfmeyer, V.: Ground-based differential absorption lidar for water-vapor and temperature profiling: development and specifications of a high-performance laser transmitter, Appl. Optics, 37, 3804–3824, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.37.003804, 1998. a
Wulfmeyer, V. and Bösenberg, J.: Ground-based differential absorption lidar for water-vapor profiling: assessment of accuracy, resolution, and meteorological applications, Appl. Optics, 37, 3825–3844, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.37.003825, 1998. a
Wulfmeyer, V. and Walther, C.: Future performance of ground-based and airborne water-vapor differential absorption lidar. I. Overview and theory, Appl. Optics, 40, 5304–5320, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.40.005304, 2001. a
Wulfmeyer, V., Behrendt, A., Kottmeier, C., Corsmeier, U., Barthlott, C., Craig, G. C., Hagen, M., Althausen, D., Aoshima, F., Arpagaus, M., Bauer, H.-S., Bennett, L., Blyth, A., Brandau, C., Champollion, C., Crewell, S., Dick, G., Di Girolamo, P., Dorninger, M., Dufournet, Y., Eigenmann, R., Engelmann, R., Flamant, C., Foken, T., Gorgas, T., Grzeschik, M., Handwerker, J., Hauck, C., Höller, H., Junkermann, W., Kalthoff, N., Kiemle, C., Klink, S., König, M., Krauss, L., Long, C. N., Madonna, F., Mobbs, S., Neininger, B., Pal, S., Peters, G., Pigeon, G., Richard, E., Rotach, M. W., Russchenberg, H., Schwitalla, T., Smith, V., Steinacker, R., Trentmann, J., Turner, D. D., van Baelen, J., Vogt, S., Volkert, H., Weckwerth, T., Wernli, H., Wieser, A., and Wirth, M.: The Convective and Orographically-induced Precipitation Study (COPS): the scientific strategy, the field phase, and research highlights, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 3–30, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.752, 2011. a
Wulfmeyer, V., Hardesty, R. M., Turner, D. D., Behrendt, A., Cadeddu, M. P., Di Girolamo, P., Schlüssel, P., Van Baelen, J., and Zus, F.: A review of the remote sensing of lower tropospheric thermodynamic profiles and its indispensable role for the understanding and the simulation of water and energy cycles, Rev. Geophys., 53, 819–895, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014RG000476, 2015. a
Wulfmeyer, V., Muppa, S. K., Behrendt, A., Hammann, E., Späth, F., Sorbjan, Z., Turner, D. D., and Hardesty, R. M.: Determination of convective boundary layer entrainment fluxes, dissipation rates, and the molecular destruction of variances: theoretical description and a strategy for its confirmation with a novel lidar system synergy, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 667–692, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-14-0392.1, 2016. a
Wulfmeyer, V., Turner, D. D., Baker, B., Banta, R., Behrendt, A., Bonin, T., Brewer, W. A., Buban, M., Choukulkar, A., Dumas, E., Hardesty, R. M., Heus, T., Ingwersen, J., Lange, D., Lee, T. R., Metzendorf, S., Muppa, S. K., Meyers, T., Newsom, R., Osman, M., Raasch, S., Santanello, J., Senff, C., Späth, F., Wagner, T., and Weckwerth, T.: A new research approach for observing and characterizing land–atmosphere feedback, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 99, 1639–1667, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0009.1, 2018. a
Wulfmeyer, V., Senff, C., Späth, F., Behrendt, A., Lange, D., Banta, R. M., Brewer, W. A., Wieser, A., and Turner, D. D.: Profiling the molecular destruction rates of temperature and humidity as well as the turbulent kinetic energy dissipation in the convective boundary layer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1175–1196, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1175-2024, 2024. a
Zhang, D., Comstock, J., and Morris, V.: Comparison of planetary boundary layer height from ceilometer with ARM radiosonde data, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4735–4749, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4735-2022, 2022. a
Zuev, V. V., Zuev, V. E., Makushkin, Y. S., Marichev, V. N., and Mitsel, A. A.: Laser sounding of atmospheric humidity: experiment, Appl. Optics, 22, 3742–3746, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.22.003742, 1983. a
Short summary
Humidity transport from the Earth's surface into the atmosphere is relevant for many processes. However, knowledge of the actual distribution of humidity concentrations is sparse – mainly due to technological limitations. With the lidar presented herein, it is possible to measure humidity concentrations and their vertical fluxes up to altitudes of > 3 km with high spatiotemporal resolution, opening new possibilities for detailed process understanding and, ultimately, better model representation.
Humidity transport from the Earth's surface into the atmosphere is relevant for many processes....
