Articles | Volume 19, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-2437-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-2437-2026
Research article
 | 
14 Apr 2026
Research article |  | 14 Apr 2026

Uncertainty assessment of TROPOMI NO2 over Europe using ground-based remote sensing observations

Felipe Cifuentes, Henk Eskes, Ankie Piters, Julian Gomez, John Douros, Gaia Pinardi, Martina M. Friedrich, Enrico Dammers, Manuel Gebetsberger, and K. Folkert Boersma

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse

Peer review completion

AR – Author's response | RR – Referee report | ED – Editor decision | EF – Editorial file upload
AR by Felipe Cifuentes on behalf of the Authors (01 Apr 2026)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (02 Apr 2026) by Sandip Dhomse
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (02 Apr 2026)
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (02 Apr 2026)
ED: Publish as is (02 Apr 2026) by Sandip Dhomse
AR by Felipe Cifuentes on behalf of the Authors (03 Apr 2026)
Download
Short summary
Satellite NO2 data are essential for monitoring air pollution, but they are affected by several sources of uncertainty. This study evaluates the major error contributors in TROPOMI (TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument) NO2 retrievals by analyzing each retrieval step and comparing with ground-based observations. Key findings include biases in the separation of stratospheric and tropospheric NO2, representation and smoothing errors, and substantial variability among the ground-based instruments used for validation.
Share