Articles | Volume 9, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4123-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4123-2016
Research article
 | 
29 Aug 2016
Research article |  | 29 Aug 2016

Errors in radial velocity variance from Doppler wind lidar

H. Wang, R. J. Barthelmie, P. Doubrawa, and S. C. Pryor

Related authors

Lidar arc scan uncertainty reduction through scanning geometry optimization
Hui Wang, Rebecca J. Barthelmie, Sara C. Pryor, and Gareth. Brown
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 1653–1669, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1653-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1653-2016, 2016

Related subject area

Subject: Others (Wind, Precipitation, Temperature, etc.) | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Estimating the refractivity bias of FORMOSAT-7/COSMIC-2 Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) radio occultation in the deep troposphere
Gia Huan Pham, Shu-Chih Yang, Chih-Chien Chang, Shu-Ya Chen, and Cheng Yung Huang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3605–3623, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3605-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3605-2024, 2024
Short summary
High Spectral Resolution Lidar – generation 2 (HSRL-2) retrievals of ocean surface wind speed: methodology and evaluation
Sanja Dmitrovic, Johnathan W. Hair, Brian L. Collister, Ewan Crosbie, Marta A. Fenn, Richard A. Ferrare, David B. Harper, Chris A. Hostetler, Yongxiang Hu, John A. Reagan, Claire E. Robinson, Shane T. Seaman, Taylor J. Shingler, Kenneth L. Thornhill, Holger Vömel, Xubin Zeng, and Armin Sorooshian
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3515–3532, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3515-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3515-2024, 2024
Short summary
Dual adaptive differential threshold method for automated detection of faint and strong echo features in radar observations of winter storms
Laura M. Tomkins, Sandra E. Yuter, and Matthew A. Miller
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3377–3399, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3377-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3377-2024, 2024
Short summary
Noise filtering options for conically scanning Doppler lidar measurements with low pulse accumulation
Eileen Päschke and Carola Detring
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3187–3217, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3187-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3187-2024, 2024
Short summary
Measuring rainfall using microwave links: the influence of temporal sampling
Luuk D. van der Valk, Miriam Coenders-Gerrits, Rolf W. Hut, Aart Overeem, Bas Walraven, and Remko Uijlenhoet
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2811–2832, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2811-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2811-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Banta, R. M., Pichugina, Y. L., Kelley, N. D., Hardesty, R. M., and Brewer, W. A.: Wind energy meteorology: Insight into wind properties in the turbine-rotor layer of the atmosphere from high-resolution Doppler lidar, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 94, 883–902, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00057.1, 2013.
Barthelmie, R. J., Wang, H., Doubrawa, P., Giroux, G., and Pryor, S. C.: Effects of an escarpment on flow parameters of relevance to wind turbines, Wind Energy, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1980, online first, 2016.
Box, G. E. P., Jenkins, G. M., Reinsel, G. C., and Ljung, G. M.: Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, John Wiley & Sons, 712 pp., 2015.
Branlard, E., Pedersen, A. T., Mann, J., Angelou, N., Fischer, A., Mikkelsen, T., Harris, M., Slinger, C., and Montes, B. F.: Retrieving wind statistics from average spectrum of continuous-wave lidar, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 1673–1683, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1673-2013, 2013.
Burton, T., Sharpe, D., Jenkins, N., and Bossanyi, E.: Wind energy handbook, John Wiley & Sons, 780 pp., 2011.
Download
Short summary
This paper investigates how long a sampling duration of lidar measurements should be in order to accurately estimate radial velocity variance to obtain turbulence statistics. Using observations and statistical simulations, it is demonstrated that large probe volumes in lidar measurements increase the autocorrelation values, and consequently the uncertainty in radial velocity variance estimates. It is further shown that the random error can exceed 10 % for 30–60 min sampling duration.