Articles | Volume 10, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-1299-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-1299-2017
Research article
 | 
03 Apr 2017
Research article |  | 03 Apr 2017

A European-wide 222radon and 222radon progeny comparison study

Dominik Schmithüsen, Scott Chambers, Bernd Fischer, Stefan Gilge, Juha Hatakka, Victor Kazan, Rolf Neubert, Jussi Paatero, Michel Ramonet, Clemens Schlosser, Sabine Schmid, Alex Vermeulen, and Ingeborg Levin

Viewed

Total article views: 3,249 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,127 983 139 3,249 577 116 143
  • HTML: 2,127
  • PDF: 983
  • XML: 139
  • Total: 3,249
  • Supplement: 577
  • BibTeX: 116
  • EndNote: 143
Views and downloads (calculated since 24 Aug 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 24 Aug 2016)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,249 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,157 with geography defined and 92 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 17 May 2024
Short summary
A European-wide 222radon/222radon progeny comparison study has been conducted at nine measurement stations in order to determine differences between existing 222radon instrumentation and atmospheric data sets, respectively. Mean differences up to 45 % were found between monitors. These differences need to be taken into account if the data shall serve for quantitative regional atmospheric transport model validation.