Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
AMT
Articles | Volume 10, issue 4
Articles | Volume 10, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-1299-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-1299-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Articles | Volume 10, issue 4
Research article
 | 
03 Apr 2017
Research article |  | 03 Apr 2017

A European-wide 222radon and 222radon progeny comparison study

Dominik Schmithüsen, Scott Chambers, Bernd Fischer, Stefan Gilge, Juha Hatakka, Victor Kazan, Rolf Neubert, Jussi Paatero, Michel Ramonet, Clemens Schlosser, Sabine Schmid, Alex Vermeulen, and Ingeborg Levin

Viewed

Total article views: 4,042 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,638 1,216 188 4,042 712 190 216
  • HTML: 2,638
  • PDF: 1,216
  • XML: 188
  • Total: 4,042
  • Supplement: 712
  • BibTeX: 190
  • EndNote: 216
Views and downloads (calculated since 24 Aug 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 24 Aug 2016)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,042 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,937 with geography defined and 105 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 06 Dec 2025
Download
Short summary
A European-wide 222radon/222radon progeny comparison study has been conducted at nine measurement stations in order to determine differences between existing 222radon instrumentation and atmospheric data sets, respectively. Mean differences up to 45 % were found between monitors. These differences need to be taken into account if the data shall serve for quantitative regional atmospheric transport model validation.
Read more
Share