64 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Missing Data Imputation on IoT Sensor Networks: Implications for on-Site Sensor Calibration N. Okafor & D. Delaney 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3105442
2. Prospects of Aloe vera and its Bioactive Compounds in Diabetes: Critical Review M. Sharma et al. 10.22207/JPAM.15.4.54
3. Traceable PM2.5 and PM10 Calibration of Low-Cost Sensors with Ambient-like Aerosols Generated in the Laboratory S. Horender et al. 10.3390/app11199014
4. Nitrogen dioxide exposures from biomass cookstoves in the Peruvian Andes J. Kephart et al. 10.1111/ina.12653
5. Comparison of Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring with Reference Methods in Zagreb, Croatia S. Davila et al. 10.3390/atmos16040472
6. Indoor air quality monitoring and management in hospitality: an overarching framework S. Zanni et al. 10.1108/IJCHM-12-2021-1549
7. Gaussian process regression model for dynamically calibrating and surveilling a wireless low-cost particulate matter sensor network in Delhi T. Zheng et al. 10.5194/amt-12-5161-2019
8. The U.S. EPA wildland fire sensor challenge: Performance and evaluation of solver submitted multi-pollutant sensor systems M. Landis et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118165
9. The Kansas City Transportation and Local-Scale Air Quality Study (KC-TRAQS): Integration of Low-Cost Sensors and Reference Grade Monitoring in a Complex Metropolitan Area. Part 1: Overview of the Project S. Kimbrough et al. 10.3390/chemosensors7020026
10. Measurement report: A complex street-level air quality observation campaign in a heavy-traffic area utilizing the multivariate adaptive regression splines method for field calibration of low-cost sensors P. Bauerová et al. 10.5194/acp-25-4477-2025
11. The Relocation Problem of Field Calibrated Low-Cost Sensor Systems in Air Quality Monitoring: A Sampling Bias G. Tancev & C. Pascale 10.3390/s20216198
12. Stochastic Online Calibration of Low-Cost Gas Sensor Networks With Mobile References G. Tancev & F. Toro 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3145945
13. Mapping Urban Air Quality from Mobile Sensors Using Spatio-Temporal Geostatistics Y. Idir et al. 10.3390/s21144717
14. Low-cost sensors as an alternative for long-term air quality monitoring X. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109438
15. Neighborhood-Level Particle Pollution Assessment during the COVID-19 Pandemic via a Novel IoT Solution C. Spandonidis et al. 10.3390/su15108233
16. Challenges and Opportunities in Calibrating Low-Cost Environmental Sensors N. Nalakurthi et al. 10.3390/s24113650
17. Exploring Evaluation Variables for Low-Cost Particulate Matter Monitors to Assess Occupational Exposure S. Ruiter et al. 10.3390/ijerph17228602
18. Characterising a mobile reference station (MoRS) to quantify personal exposure to air quality M. Hedges et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120160
19. Performance evaluation of twelve low-cost PM2.5 sensors at an ambient air monitoring site B. Feenstra et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116946
20. Field performance of a low-cost sensor in the monitoring of particulate matter in Santiago, Chile M. Tagle et al. 10.1007/s10661-020-8118-4
21. Spatial-Temporal Analysis of PM2.5 and NO2 Concentrations Collected Using Low-Cost Sensors in Peñuelas, Puerto Rico S. Reece et al. 10.3390/s18124314
22. Youth Engaged Participatory Air Monitoring: A ‘Day in the Life’ in Urban Environmental Justice Communities J. Johnston et al. 10.3390/ijerph17010093
23. Development and application of a United States-wide correction for PM2.5 data collected with the PurpleAir sensor K. Barkjohn et al. 10.5194/amt-14-4617-2021
24. Incorporating Low-Cost Sensor Measurements into High-Resolution PM2.5 Modeling at a Large Spatial Scale J. Bi et al. 10.1021/acs.est.9b06046
25. Dissecting PM sensor capabilities: A combined experimental and theoretical study on particle sizing and physicochemical properties X. Qin et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124354
26. Design and evaluation of a portable PM2.5 monitor featuring a low-cost sensor in line with an active filter sampler J. Tryner et al. 10.1039/C9EM00234K
27. Long-term evaluation of commercial air quality sensors: an overview from the QUANT (Quantification of Utility of Atmospheric Network Technologies) study S. Diez et al. 10.5194/amt-17-3809-2024
28. Laboratory evaluation of low-cost PurpleAir PM monitors and in-field correction using co-located portable filter samplers J. Tryner et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117067
29. Performance evaluation of ozone and particulate matter sensors H. DeWitt et al. 10.1080/10962247.2020.1713921
30. Sens-BERT: A BERT-Based Approach for Enabling Transferability and Re-Calibration of Calibration Models for Low-Cost Sensors Under Reference Measurements Scarcity M. Narayana et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2024.3362962
31. Examining spatiotemporal variability of urban particulate matter and application of high-time resolution data from a network of low-cost air pollution sensors S. Feinberg et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.026
32. Precision and Accuracy of a Direct-Reading Miniaturized Monitor in PM2.5 Exposure Assessment F. Borghi et al. 10.3390/s18093089
33. Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors: One-Year Field Comparative Measurement of Different Gas Sensors and Particle Counters with Reference Monitors at Tušimice Observatory P. Bauerová et al. 10.3390/atmos11050492
34. Influence of particle properties and environmental factors on the performance of typical particle monitors and low-cost particle sensors in the market of China D. Wu et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118825
35. Performance and Deployment of Low-Cost Particle Sensor Units to Monitor Biomass Burning Events and Their Application in an Educational Initiative F. Reisen et al. 10.3390/s21217206
36. A Review of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors from the Developers’ Perspectives B. Alfano et al. 10.3390/s20236819
37. Global Ozone (GO3) Project and AQTreks: Use of evolving technologies by students and citizen scientists to monitor air pollutants J. Ellenburg et al. 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100048
38. Field comparison of electrochemical gas sensor data correction algorithms for ambient air measurements Y. Liang et al. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128897
39. Predicting airborne pollutant concentrations and events in a commercial building using low-cost pollutant sensors and machine learning: A case study A. Mohammadshirazi et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108833
40. A novel low sampling rate and cost-efficient active sampler for medium/long-term monitoring of gaseous pollutants Z. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132583
41. Wireless Sensor Networks in Environmental Monitoring Applications Challenges and Future Directions S. R et al. 10.1051/itmconf/20257603002
42. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Air Pollution Monitoring: A Survey N. Hossein Motlagh et al. 10.1109/JIOT.2023.3290508
43. Evaluation of Long-Term Performance of Six PM2.5 Sensor Types K. Barkjohn et al. 10.3390/s25041265
44. Review of the Performance of Low-Cost Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring F. Karagulian et al. 10.3390/atmos10090506
45. Deliberating Performance Targets: Follow-on workshop discussing PM10, NO2, CO, and SO2 air sensor targets R. Duvall et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118099
46. QUANT: a long-term multi-city commercial air sensor dataset for performance evaluation S. Diez et al. 10.1038/s41597-024-03767-2
47. Dense Air Quality Sensor Networks: Validation, Analysis, and Benefits M. Zaidan et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2022.3216071
48. Air Quality Sensor Networks for Evidence-Based Policy Making: Best Practices for Actionable Insights J. Hofman et al. 10.3390/atmos13060944
49. A review on ambient and indoor air pollution status in Africa K. Agbo et al. 10.1016/j.apr.2020.11.006
50. EEATC: A Novel Calibration Approach for Low-Cost Sensors M. Narayana et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2023.3304366
51. Observed data quality concerns involving low-cost air sensors A. Clements et al. 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100034
52. Calibration and validation-based assessment of low-cost air quality sensors J. Dong et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179364
53. Relevance of Drift Components and Unit-to-Unit Variability in the Predictive Maintenance of Low-Cost Electrochemical Sensor Systems in Air Quality Monitoring G. Tancev 10.3390/s21093298
54. Academically Produced Air Pollution Sensors for Personal Exposure Assessment: The Canarin Project B. Dessimond et al. 10.3390/s21051876
55. Assessment of detected in situ and modeled PM10/2.5 concentration levels during the urban transformation process in Novi Sad, Serbia M. Sunjevic et al. 10.2298/TSCI220215108S
56. Improving the Quality of Measurements Made by Alphasense NO2 Non-Reference Sensors Using the Mathematical Methods M. Rogulski et al. 10.3390/s22103619
57. Mapping urban air quality using mobile sampling with low-cost sensors and machine learning in Seoul, South Korea C. Lim et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105022
58. Characterising low-cost sensors in highly portable platforms to quantify personal exposure in diverse environments L. Chatzidiakou et al. 10.5194/amt-12-4643-2019
59. Evaluation of calibration performance of a low-cost particulate matter sensor using collocated and distant NO2 K. Ko et al. 10.5194/amt-17-3303-2024
60. Low-cost sensors and microscale land use regression: Data fusion to resolve air quality variations with high spatial and temporal resolution L. Weissert et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.019
61. Field and laboratory performance evaluations of 28 gas-phase air quality sensors by the AQ-SPEC program A. Collier-Oxandale et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117092
62. Engagement and Social Impact in Tech-Based Citizen Science Initiatives for Achieving the SDGs: A Systematic Literature Review with a Perspective on Complex Thinking J. Sanabria-Z et al. 10.3390/su141710978
63. Outlier detection and gap filling methodologies for low-cost air quality measurements T. Ottosen & P. Kumar 10.1039/C8EM00593A
64. Long-term field comparison of multiple low-cost particulate matter sensors in an outdoor urban environment F. Bulot et al. 10.1038/s41598-019-43716-3