Articles | Volume 11, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4605-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4605-2018
Research article
 | 
08 Aug 2018
Research article |  | 08 Aug 2018

Long-term evaluation of air sensor technology under ambient conditions in Denver, Colorado

Stephen Feinberg, Ron Williams, Gayle S. W. Hagler, Joshua Rickard, Ryan Brown, Daniel Garver, Greg Harshfield, Phillip Stauffer, Erick Mattson, Robert Judge, and Sam Garvey

Viewed

Total article views: 5,855 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
3,972 1,767 116 5,855 490 74 89
  • HTML: 3,972
  • PDF: 1,767
  • XML: 116
  • Total: 5,855
  • Supplement: 490
  • BibTeX: 74
  • EndNote: 89
Views and downloads (calculated since 08 Feb 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 08 Feb 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 5,855 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 5,521 with geography defined and 334 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Discussed (final revised paper)

Latest update: 24 May 2024
Download
Short summary
Air pollution sensors are quickly proliferating for use in a wide variety of applications, with a low price point that supports use in high-density networks, citizen science, and individual consumer use. We evaluated the performance of particulate matter, ozone, and nitrogen dioxide sensors in Denver, Colorado, over a period of seven months. We found that these sensors could vary greatly in their performance, but some were able to replicate trends measured by traditional instruments.