Articles | Volume 12, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2403-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.Evaluating the performance of five different chemical ionization techniques for detecting gaseous oxygenated organic species
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 17 Apr 2019)
- Preprint (discussion started on 10 Dec 2018)
Interactive discussion
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
- Printer-friendly version
- Supplement
-
RC1: 'Comparision of different chemical ionization mass spectrometry techniques', Anonymous Referee #2, 10 Jan 2019
- AC1: 'Response to reviewer #2', Matthieu Riva, 14 Mar 2019
-
RC2: 'Comments on amt-2018-407', Anonymous Referee #3, 14 Feb 2019
- AC2: 'Response to reviewer #3', Matthieu Riva, 14 Mar 2019
Peer-review completion
AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Matthieu Riva on behalf of the Authors (14 Mar 2019)
Author's response
Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (24 Mar 2019) by Keding Lu
AR by Matthieu Riva on behalf of the Authors (26 Mar 2019)