73 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Monitoring wind and particle concentrations near freshwater and marine harmful algal blooms (HABs) L. Bilyeu et al. 10.1039/D4VA00172A
2. A machine learning field calibration method for improving the performance of low-cost particle sensors S. Patra et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107457
3. Leveraging machine learning algorithms to advance low-cost air sensor calibration in stationary and mobile settings A. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119692
4. Development and testing a low-cost device for airborne PM monitoring in highly anthropized areas: The international maritime hub of Civitavecchia (Rome, Italy) F. Lucci et al. 10.1016/j.geogeo.2022.100120
5. Evaluation of a low-cost dryer for a low-cost optical particle counter M. Chacón-Mateos et al. 10.5194/amt-15-7395-2022
6. Visibility as a proxy for air quality in East Africa A. Singh et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab8b12
7. Pinpointing sources of pollution using citizen science and hyperlocal low-cost mobile source apportionment D. Bousiotis et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2024.109069
8. Opportunistic mobile air quality mapping using sensors on postal service vehicles: from point clouds to actionable insights J. Hofman et al. 10.3389/fenvh.2023.1232867
9. Effect of relative humidity on the performance of five cost-effective PM sensors P. Wang et al. 10.1080/02786826.2021.1910136
10. Comparison of Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring with Reference Methods in Zagreb, Croatia S. Davila et al. 10.3390/atmos16040472
11. Moving from monitoring to real-time interventions for air quality: are low-cost sensor networks ready to support urban digital twins? N. Cowell et al. 10.3389/frsc.2024.1500516
12. Design and Implementation of a Crowdsensing-Based Air Quality Monitoring Open and FAIR Data Infrastructure P. Diviacco et al. 10.3390/pr11071881
13. Hyperlocal air pollution in an urban environment - measured with low-cost sensors L. Frederickson et al. 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101684
14. Evaluation of optical particulate matter sensors under realistic conditions of strong and mild urban pollution A. Masic et al. 10.5194/amt-13-6427-2020
15. Machine learning techniques to improve the field performance of low-cost air quality sensors T. Bush et al. 10.5194/amt-15-3261-2022
16. Vertical variation of atmospheric particulate matter under different pollution levels in the suburbs of Tianjin based on unmanned aerial vehicle S. Li et al. 10.1080/10962247.2022.2134231
17. Field Calibration and Evaluation of an Internet-of-Things-Based Particulate Matter Sensor N. Cowell et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2021.798485
18. Calibration Methods for Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors Considering Seasonal Variability J. Kang & K. Choi 10.3390/s24103023
19. Verification and Usability of Indoor Air Quality Monitoring Tools in the Framework of Health-Related Studies A. Aguado et al. 10.3390/air3010003
20. Constructing a pollen proxy from low-cost Optical Particle Counter (OPC) data processed with Neural Networks and Random Forests S. Mills et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161969
21. Degradation mechanism of measuring performance of optical particle counter under temperature-pressure coupling effect L. Lu et al. 10.1088/1361-6501/ad3e1d
22. Seasonally optimized calibrations improve low-cost sensor performance: long-term field evaluation of PurpleAir sensors in urban and rural India M. Campmier et al. 10.5194/amt-16-4357-2023
23. Improving Aerosol Characterization Using an Optical Particle Counter Coupled with a Quartz Crystal Microbalance with an Integrated Microheater E. Zampetti et al. 10.3390/s24082500
24. From low-cost sensors to high-quality data: A summary of challenges and best practices for effectively calibrating low-cost particulate matter mass sensors M. Giordano et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105833
25. Light painting photography makes particulate matter air pollution visible F. Pope et al. 10.1038/s43247-024-01409-4
26. Schools’ air quality monitoring for health and education: Methods and protocols of the SAMHE initiative and project L. Chatzidiakou et al. 10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100266
27. Calibration Method for Particulate Matter Low-Cost Sensors Used in Ambient Air Quality Monitoring and Research J. Venkatraman Jagatha et al. 10.3390/s21123960
28. Mass concentration measurements of autumn bioaerosol using low-cost sensors in a mature temperate woodland free-air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE) experiment: investigating the role of meteorology and carbon dioxide levels A. Baird et al. 10.5194/bg-19-2653-2022
29. Long-Term Evaluation of Mid-Cost Optical Particle Counters for PM2.5 Monitoring in an Underground Subway Station: Insights from a 15-Month Study T. Dinh et al. 10.3390/chemosensors13010025
30. Impact of nylon and teflon filter media on the sampling of inorganic aerosols over a high altitude site L. Yang et al. 10.1016/j.envadv.2023.100373
31. Development of a physics-based method for calibration of low-cost particulate matter sensors and comparison with machine learning models B. Prajapati et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2023.106284
32. PM2.5 exposure differences between children and adults L. Harr et al. 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101198
33. Calibration methodology of low-cost sensors for high-quality monitoring of fine particulate matter M. Aix et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164063
34. MitH: A framework for Mitigating Hygroscopicity in low-cost PM sensors M. Casari & L. Po 10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.105955
35. Simultaneous measurement of spatially resolved particle emissions in a pilot plant scale baghouse filter applying distributed low-cost particulate matter sensors P. Bächler et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2020.105644
36. A case study evaluating the performance of a cost-effective optical particle counter coupled with a humidity compensation approach for ambient air monitoring of particulate matter T. Dinh et al. 10.1007/s44273-023-00017-6
37. Improving PM10 sensor accuracy in urban areas through calibration in Timișoara R. Blaga & S. Gautam 10.1038/s41612-024-00812-0
38. Machine learning methods for low-cost pollen monitoring – Model optimisation and interpretability S. Mills et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165853
39. Using low-cost sensors to assess common air pollution sources across multiple residences C. Rathbone et al. 10.1038/s41598-025-85985-1
40. EEATC: A Novel Calibration Approach for Low-Cost Sensors M. Narayana et al. 10.1109/JSEN.2023.3304366
41. Local spatiotemporal dynamics of particulate matter and oak pollen measured by machine learning aided optical particle counters S. Mills et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173450
42. Particulate matter in a lockdown home: evaluation, calibration, results and health risk from an IoT enabled low-cost sensor network for residential air quality monitoring N. Cowell et al. 10.1039/D2EA00124A
43. Air Quality Sensor Networks for Evidence-Based Policy Making: Best Practices for Actionable Insights J. Hofman et al. 10.3390/atmos13060944
44. The Aerosol Research Observation Station (AEROS) K. Ardon-Dryer et al. 10.5194/amt-15-2345-2022
45. Evaluation of calibration performance of a low-cost particulate matter sensor using collocated and distant NO2 K. Ko et al. 10.5194/amt-17-3303-2024
46. Assessing the sources of particles at an urban background site using both regulatory instruments and low-cost sensors – a comparative study D. Bousiotis et al. 10.5194/amt-14-4139-2021
47. Spatial Distribution of PM2.5 Mass and Number Concentrations in Paris (France) from the Pollutrack Network of Mobile Sensors during 2018–2022 J. Renard et al. 10.3390/s23208560
48. A study on the performance of low-cost sensors for source apportionment at an urban background site D. Bousiotis et al. 10.5194/amt-15-4047-2022
49. Seasonal Changes in Urban PM2.5 Hotspots and Sources from Low-Cost Sensors L. Harr et al. 10.3390/atmos13050694
50. Quantification of within-vehicle exposure to NOx and particles: Variation with outside air quality, route choice and ventilation options V. Matthaios et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117810
51. Air quality assessment in three East African cities using calibrated low-cost sensors with a focus on road-based hotspots A. Singh et al. 10.1088/2515-7620/ac0e0a
52. Evaluation of low-cost formaldehyde sensors calibration M. Justo Alonso et al. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109380
53. Characterisation and calibration of low-cost PM sensors at high temporal resolution to reference-grade performance F. Bulot et al. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15943
54. Long-term airborne measurements of pollutants over the United Kingdom to support air quality model development and evaluation A. Mynard et al. 10.5194/amt-16-4229-2023
55. Portable Sensors for Dynamic Exposure Assessments in Urban Environments: State of the Science J. Hofman et al. 10.3390/s24175653
56. A novel spatiotemporal prediction approach to fill air pollution data gaps using mobile sensors, machine learning and citizen science techniques A. Baruah et al. 10.1038/s41612-024-00859-z
57. Monitoring and apportioning sources of indoor air quality using low-cost particulate matter sensors D. Bousiotis et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2023.107907
58. Real-Time Source Apportionment of Particulate Matter from Low-Cost Particle Sensors Using Machine Learning V. Kumar et al. 10.1007/s41810-024-00271-3
59. In-situ validation of embedded physics-based calibration in low-cost particulate matter sensor for urban air quality monitoring Z. Feng et al. 10.1016/j.uclim.2025.102289
60. Calibrating low-cost sensors for ambient air monitoring: Techniques, trends, and challenges L. Liang 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111163
61. Assessment of the Feasibility of a Future Integrated Larger-Scale Epidemiological Study to Evaluate Health Risks of Air Pollution Episodes in Children S. Nauwelaerts et al. 10.3390/ijerph19148531
62. Testing a New “Decrypted” Algorithm for Plantower Sensors Measuring PM2.5: Comparison with an Alternative Algorithm L. Wallace 10.3390/a16080392
63. Performance evaluation of MOMA (MOment MAtching) – a remote network calibration technique for PM2.5 and PM10 sensors L. Weissert et al. 10.5194/amt-16-4709-2023
64. Distant calibration of low-cost PM and NO2 sensors; evidence from multiple sensor testbeds J. Hofman et al. 10.1016/j.apr.2021.101246
65. Potential of low-cost PM monitoring sensors to fill monitoring gaps in areas of Sub-Saharan Africa G. Gualtieri et al. 10.1016/j.apr.2024.102158
66. Impacts of daily household activities on indoor particulate and NO2 concentrations; a case study from oxford UK A. Singh et al. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34210
67. Investigating Use of Low-Cost Sensors to Increase Accuracy and Equity of Real-Time Air Quality Information E. Considine et al. 10.1021/acs.est.2c06626
68. Towards comprehensive air quality management using low-cost sensors for pollution source apportionment D. Bousiotis et al. 10.1038/s41612-023-00424-0
69. Parsimonious Random-Forest-Based Land-Use Regression Model Using Particulate Matter Sensors in Berlin, Germany J. Venkatraman Jagatha et al. 10.3390/s24134193
70. SensEURCity: A multi-city air quality dataset collected for 2020/2021 using open low-cost sensor systems M. Van Poppel et al. 10.1038/s41597-023-02135-w
71. Particle generation and dispersion from high-speed dental drilling M. Kumar et al. 10.1007/s00784-023-05163-3
72. Spatial calibration and PM2.5 mapping of low-cost air quality sensors H. Chu et al. 10.1038/s41598-020-79064-w
73. Deployment of networked low-cost sensors and comparison to real-time stationary monitors in New Delhi J. Prakash et al. 10.1080/10962247.2021.1890276