A miniature Portable Emissions Measurement System (PEMS) for real-driving monitoring of motorcycles

Vojtisek-Lom, Michal; Zardini, Alessandro A.; Pechout, Martin; Dittrich, Lubos; Forni, Fausto; Montigny, François; Carriero, Massimo; Giechaskiel, Barouch; Martini, Giorgio

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-5827-2020

Articles | Volume 13, issue 11

https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-5827-2020

© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-5827-2020

© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Articles | Volume 13, issue 11

Research article

|

04 Nov 2020

Research article |

| 04 Nov 2020

A miniature Portable Emissions Measurement System (PEMS) for real-driving monitoring of motorcycles

Michal Vojtisek-Lom, Alessandro A. Zardini, Martin Pechout, Lubos Dittrich, Fausto Forni, François Montigny, Massimo Carriero, Barouch Giechaskiel, and Giorgio Martini

Download

Final revised paper (published on 04 Nov 2020)
Supplement to the final revised paper
Preprint (discussion started on 06 Jan 2020)
Supplement to the preprint

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

- Printer-friendly version

- Supplement

RC1: 'Review', Anonymous Referee #3, 11 May 2020
- AC1: 'Response to the review', Michal Vojtisek-Lom, 02 Jul 2020
RC2: 'Good work, but it needs some improvements', Anonymous Referee #4, 29 May 2020
- AC2: 'Response to the review', Michal Vojtisek-Lom, 02 Jul 2020

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

AR by Michal Vojtisek-Lom on behalf of the Authors (29 Jul 2020) Author's response Manuscript

ED: Publish as is (06 Aug 2020) by Pierre Herckes

Short summary

The feasibility of monitoring on-road emissions from small motorcycles with two highly compact portable emissions monitoring systems was evaluated on three motorcycles, with positive results. Mass emissions measured on the road were consistent among repeated runs, with differences between laboratory and on-road tests much larger than those between portable and laboratory systems, which were, on the average, within units of percent over standard test cycles.