Articles | Volume 14, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1761-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1761-2021
Research article
 | 
03 Mar 2021
Research article |  | 03 Mar 2021

Comparison of different droplet measurement techniques in the Braunschweig Icing Wind Tunnel

Inken Knop, Stephan E. Bansmer, Valerian Hahn, and Christiane Voigt

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Inken Knop on behalf of the Authors (02 Oct 2020)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (05 Oct 2020) by Pierre Herckes
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (15 Nov 2020)
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (07 Jan 2021)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (07 Jan 2021) by Pierre Herckes
AR by Inken Knop on behalf of the Authors (17 Jan 2021)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (18 Jan 2021) by Pierre Herckes
AR by Inken Knop on behalf of the Authors (19 Jan 2021)
Download
Short summary
Knowledge on droplet size and concentration is essential for several applications of atomizers. After having developed a new spray system for our icing wind tunnel, we did intercomparison tests of different droplet measurement techniques including two commercial probes. The probes proved the good repeatability of the spray conditions and showed good overall agreement in measuring size and concentration. Furthermore, we could identify limitations and error sources of the measuring techniques.