Articles | Volume 14, issue 5
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 3657–3672, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3657-2021

Special issue: Research results from the 14th International Conference on...

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 3657–3672, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3657-2021

Research article 20 May 2021

Research article | 20 May 2021

A field intercomparison of three passive air samplers for gaseous mercury in ambient air

Attilio Naccarato et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 969 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
732 220 17 969 70 7 13
  • HTML: 732
  • PDF: 220
  • XML: 17
  • Total: 969
  • Supplement: 70
  • BibTeX: 7
  • EndNote: 13
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Dec 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 29 Dec 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 925 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 922 with geography defined and 3 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 01 Aug 2021
Download
Short summary
Mercury monitoring in support of the Minamata Convention requires effective and reliable analytical tools. Passive sampling is a promising approach for creating a sustainable long-term network for atmospheric mercury with improved spatial resolution and global coverage. In this study the analytical performance of three passive air samplers (CNR-PAS, IVL-PAS, and MerPAS) was assessed over extended deployment periods and the accuracy of concentrations was judged by comparison with active sampling.