Articles | Volume 14, issue 5
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 3657–3672, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3657-2021

Special issue: Research results from the 14th International Conference on...

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 3657–3672, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3657-2021
Research article
20 May 2021
Research article | 20 May 2021

A field intercomparison of three passive air samplers for gaseous mercury in ambient air

Attilio Naccarato et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,859 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,261 571 27 1,859 191 17 28
  • HTML: 1,261
  • PDF: 571
  • XML: 27
  • Total: 1,859
  • Supplement: 191
  • BibTeX: 17
  • EndNote: 28
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Dec 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 29 Dec 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,859 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,799 with geography defined and 60 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 01 Feb 2023
Download
Short summary
Mercury monitoring in support of the Minamata Convention requires effective and reliable analytical tools. Passive sampling is a promising approach for creating a sustainable long-term network for atmospheric mercury with improved spatial resolution and global coverage. In this study the analytical performance of three passive air samplers (CNR-PAS, IVL-PAS, and MerPAS) was assessed over extended deployment periods and the accuracy of concentrations was judged by comparison with active sampling.