Articles | Volume 14, issue 5
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 3657–3672, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3657-2021

Special issue: Research results from the 14th International Conference on...

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 3657–3672, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3657-2021
Research article
20 May 2021
Research article | 20 May 2021

A field intercomparison of three passive air samplers for gaseous mercury in ambient air

Attilio Naccarato et al.

Related authors

Mercury accumulation in leaves of different plant types – the significance of tissue age and specific leaf area
Håkan Pleijel, Jenny Klingberg, Michelle Nerentorp, Malin C. Broberg, Brigitte Nyirambangutse, John Munthe, and Göran Wallin
Biogeosciences, 18, 6313–6328, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-6313-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-6313-2021, 2021
Short summary
Impact of Athabasca oil sands operations on mercury levels in air and deposition
Ashu Dastoor, Andrei Ryjkov, Gregor Kos, Junhua Zhang, Jane Kirk, Matthew Parsons, and Alexandra Steffen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 12783–12807, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12783-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12783-2021, 2021
Short summary
Where there is smoke there is mercury: Assessing boreal forest fire mercury emissions using aircraft and highlighting uncertainties associated with upscaling emissions estimates
David S. McLagan, Geoff W. Stupple, Andrea Darlington, Katherine Hayden, and Alexandra Steffen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 5635–5653, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5635-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5635-2021, 2021
Short summary
First direct observation of sea salt aerosol production from blowing snow above sea ice
Markus M. Frey, Sarah J. Norris, Ian M. Brooks, Philip S. Anderson, Kouichi Nishimura, Xin Yang, Anna E. Jones, Michelle G. Nerentorp Mastromonaco, David H. Jones, and Eric W. Wolff
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2549–2578, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2549-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2549-2020, 2020
Short summary
A transition of atmospheric emissions of particles and gases from on-road heavy-duty trucks
Liyuan Zhou, Åsa M. Hallquist, Mattias Hallquist, Christian M. Salvador, Samuel M. Gaita, Åke Sjödin, Martin Jerksjö, Håkan Salberg, Ingvar Wängberg, Johan Mellqvist, Qianyun Liu, Berto P. Lee, and Chak K. Chan
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1701–1722, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1701-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1701-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Real-time measurement of phase partitioning of organic compounds using a proton-transfer-reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometer coupled to a CHARON inlet
Yarong Peng, Hongli Wang, Yaqin Gao, Shengao Jing, Shuhui Zhu, Dandan Huang, Peizhi Hao, Shengrong Lou, Tiantao Cheng, Cheng Huang, and Xuan Zhang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 15–28, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-15-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-15-2023, 2023
Short summary
A quantitative comparison of methods used to measure smaller methane emissions typically observed from superannuated oil and gas infrastructure
Stuart N. Riddick, Riley Ancona, Mercy Mbua, Clay S. Bell, Aidan Duggan, Timothy L. Vaughn, Kristine Bennett, and Daniel J. Zimmerle
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6285–6296, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6285-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6285-2022, 2022
Short summary
Comparing airborne algorithms for greenhouse gas flux measurements over the Alberta oil sands
Broghan M. Erland, Cristen Adams, Andrea Darlington, Mackenzie L. Smith, Andrew K. Thorpe, Gregory R. Wentworth, Steve Conley, John Liggio, Shao-Meng Li, Charles E. Miller, and John A. Gamon
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 5841–5859, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5841-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5841-2022, 2022
Short summary
Characterization of inexpensive metal oxide sensor performance for trace methane detection
Daniel Furuta, Tofigh Sayahi, Jinsheng Li, Bruce Wilson, Albert A. Presto, and Jiayu Li
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 5117–5128, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5117-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5117-2022, 2022
Short summary
Intercomparison of upper tropospheric and lower stratospheric water vapor measurements over the Asian Summer Monsoon during the StratoClim campaign
Clare E. Singer, Benjamin W. Clouser, Sergey M. Khaykin, Martina Krämer, Francesco Cairo, Thomas Peter, Alexey Lykov, Christian Rolf, Nicole Spelten, Armin Afchine, Simone Brunamonti, and Elisabeth J. Moyer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4767–4783, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4767-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4767-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Arctic Council: Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP), Arctic Council, Tromsø, Norway, available at: https://www.amap.no/ (last access: 5 August 2020), 1991. 
Aspmo, K., Gauchard, P. A., Steffen, A., Temme, C., Berg, T., Bahlmann, E., Banic, C., Dommergue, A., Ebinghaus, R., Ferrari, C., Pirrone, N., Sprovieri, F., and Wibetoe, G.: Measurements of atmospheric mercury species during an international study of mercury depletion events at Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard, spring 2003. How reproducible are our present methods?, Atmos. Environ., 39, 7607–7619, 2005. 
Brown, R. J. C., Pirrone, N., Van Hoek, C., Sprovieri, F., Fernandez, R., and Toté, K.: Standardisation of a European measurement method for the determination of total gaseous mercury: Results of the field trial campaign and determination of a measurement uncertainty and working range, J. Environ. Monit., 12, 689–695, https://doi.org/10.1039/b924955a, 2010. 
D'Amore, F., Bencardino, M., Cinnirella, S., Sprovieri, F., and Pirrone, N.: Data quality through a web-based QA/QC system: Implementation for atmospheric mercury data from the global mercury observation system, Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 17, 1482–1491, https://doi.org/10.1039/c5em00205b, 2015. 
Dinoi, A., Cesari, D., Marinoni, A., Bonasoni, P., Riccio, A., Chianese, E., Tirimberio, G., Naccarato, A., Sprovieri, F., Andreoli, V., Moretti, S., Gullì, D., Calidonna, C. R., Ammoscato, I., and Contini, D.: Inter-comparison of carbon content in PM2.5 and PM10 collected at five measurement sites in Southern Italy, Atmosphere, 8, 243, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos8120243, 2017. 
Download
Short summary
Mercury monitoring in support of the Minamata Convention requires effective and reliable analytical tools. Passive sampling is a promising approach for creating a sustainable long-term network for atmospheric mercury with improved spatial resolution and global coverage. In this study the analytical performance of three passive air samplers (CNR-PAS, IVL-PAS, and MerPAS) was assessed over extended deployment periods and the accuracy of concentrations was judged by comparison with active sampling.