Articles | Volume 14, issue 5
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 3657–3672, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3657-2021

Special issue: Research results from the 14th International Conference on...

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 3657–3672, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3657-2021

Research article 20 May 2021

Research article | 20 May 2021

A field intercomparison of three passive air samplers for gaseous mercury in ambient air

Attilio Naccarato et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Attilio Naccarato on behalf of the Authors (16 Mar 2021)  Author's response    Author's tracked changes    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (23 Mar 2021) by Pierre Herckes
Download
Short summary
Mercury monitoring in support of the Minamata Convention requires effective and reliable analytical tools. Passive sampling is a promising approach for creating a sustainable long-term network for atmospheric mercury with improved spatial resolution and global coverage. In this study the analytical performance of three passive air samplers (CNR-PAS, IVL-PAS, and MerPAS) was assessed over extended deployment periods and the accuracy of concentrations was judged by comparison with active sampling.