Articles | Volume 14, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-391-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-391-2021
Research article
 | 
18 Jan 2021
Research article |  | 18 Jan 2021

Classification of lidar measurements using supervised and unsupervised machine learning methods

Ghazal Farhani, Robert J. Sica, and Mark Joseph Daley

Related authors

Optimal estimation method retrievals of stratospheric ozone profiles from a DIAL
Ghazal Farhani, Robert J. Sica, Sophie Godin-Beekmann, and Alexander Haefele
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 2097–2111, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2097-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2097-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Others (Wind, Precipitation, Temperature, etc.) | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Combining commercial microwave links and weather radar for classification of dry snow and rainfall
Erlend Øydvin, Renaud Gaban, Jafet Andersson, Remco (C. Z.) van de Beek, Mareile Astrid Wolff, Nils-Otto Kitterød, Christian Chwala, and Vegard Nilsen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2279–2293, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2279-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2279-2025, 2025
Short summary
Improved consistency in solar-induced fluorescence retrievals from GOME-2A with the SIFTER v3 algorithm
Juliëtte C. S. Anema, K. Folkert Boersma, Lieuwe G. Tilstra, Olaf N. E. Tuinder, and Willem W. Verstraeten
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1961–1979, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1961-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1961-2025, 2025
Short summary
An information content approach to diagnosing and improving CLIMCAPS retrieval consistency across instruments and satellites
Nadia Smith and Christopher D. Barnet
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1823–1839, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1823-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1823-2025, 2025
Short summary
Characterizing urban planetary boundary layer dynamics using 3-year Doppler wind lidar measurements in a western Yangtze River Delta city, China
Tianwen Wei, Mengya Wang, Kenan Wu, Jinlong Yuan, Haiyun Xia, and Simone Lolli
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1841–1857, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1841-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1841-2025, 2025
Short summary
Radar-based high-resolution ensemble precipitation analyses over the French Alps
Matthieu Vernay, Matthieu Lafaysse, and Clotilde Augros
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1731–1755, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1731-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1731-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Bishop, C. M.: Pattern recognition and machine learning, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2006. a, b, c
Breiman, L.: Random Forests, Mach. Learn., 45, 5–32, 2002. a
Burges, C. J.: A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition, Data Mining Knowledge Discovery, 2, 121–167, 1998. a
Christian, K., Wang, J., Ge, C., Peterson, D., Hyer, E., Yorks, J., and McGill, M.: Radiative Forcing and Stratospheric Warming of Pyrocumulonimbus Smoke Aerosols: First Modeling Results With Multisensor (EPIC, CALIPSO, and CATS) Views from Space, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 10061–10071, 2019. a
Doucet, P. J.: First aerosol measurements with the Purple Crow Lidar: lofted particulate matter straddling the stratospheric boundary, Master's thesis, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada, 2009. a, b
Download
Short summary
While it is relatively straightforward to automate the processing of lidar signals, it is difficult to automatically preprocess the measurements to distinguish between good and bad scans. It is easy to train humans to perform the task; however, considering the growing number of measurements, it is a time-consuming, on-going process. We have tested some machine learning algorithms for lidar signal classification and had success with both supervised and unsupervised methods.
Share