Articles | Volume 14, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-391-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-391-2021
Research article
 | 
18 Jan 2021
Research article |  | 18 Jan 2021

Classification of lidar measurements using supervised and unsupervised machine learning methods

Ghazal Farhani, Robert J. Sica, and Mark Joseph Daley

Related authors

Optimal estimation method retrievals of stratospheric ozone profiles from a DIAL
Ghazal Farhani, Robert J. Sica, Sophie Godin-Beekmann, and Alexander Haefele
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 2097–2111, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2097-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2097-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Others (Wind, Precipitation, Temperature, etc.) | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
An improved geolocation methodology for spaceborne radar and lidar systems
Bernat Puigdomènech Treserras and Pavlos Kollias
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6301–6314, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6301-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6301-2024, 2024
Short summary
Combining low- and high-frequency microwave radiometer measurements from the MOSAiC expedition for enhanced water vapour products
Andreas Walbröl, Hannes J. Griesche, Mario Mech, Susanne Crewell, and Kerstin Ebell
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6223–6245, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6223-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6223-2024, 2024
Short summary
HAMSTER: Hyperspectral Albedo Maps dataset with high Spatial and TEmporal Resolution
Giulia Roccetti, Luca Bugliaro, Felix Gödde, Claudia Emde, Ulrich Hamann, Mihail Manev, Michael Fritz Sterzik, and Cedric Wehrum
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6025–6046, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6025-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6025-2024, 2024
Short summary
Global-scale gravity wave analysis methodology for the ESA Earth Explorer 11 candidate CAIRT
Sebastian Rhode, Peter Preusse, Jörn Ungermann, Inna Polichtchouk, Kaoru Sato, Shingo Watanabe, Manfred Ern, Karlheinz Nogai, Björn-Martin Sinnhuber, and Martin Riese
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5785–5819, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5785-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5785-2024, 2024
Short summary
Retrieval of pseudo-BRDF-adjusted surface reflectance at 440 nm from the Geostationary Environmental Monitoring Spectrometer (GEMS)
Suyoung Sim, Sungwon Choi, Daeseong Jung, Jongho Woo, Nayeon Kim, Sungwoo Park, Honghee Kim, Ukkyo Jeong, Hyunkee​​​​​​​ Hong, and Kyung-Soo Han
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5601–5618, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5601-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5601-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Bishop, C. M.: Pattern recognition and machine learning, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2006. a, b, c
Breiman, L.: Random Forests, Mach. Learn., 45, 5–32, 2002. a
Burges, C. J.: A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition, Data Mining Knowledge Discovery, 2, 121–167, 1998. a
Christian, K., Wang, J., Ge, C., Peterson, D., Hyer, E., Yorks, J., and McGill, M.: Radiative Forcing and Stratospheric Warming of Pyrocumulonimbus Smoke Aerosols: First Modeling Results With Multisensor (EPIC, CALIPSO, and CATS) Views from Space, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 10061–10071, 2019. a
Doucet, P. J.: First aerosol measurements with the Purple Crow Lidar: lofted particulate matter straddling the stratospheric boundary, Master's thesis, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada, 2009. a, b
Download
Short summary
While it is relatively straightforward to automate the processing of lidar signals, it is difficult to automatically preprocess the measurements to distinguish between good and bad scans. It is easy to train humans to perform the task; however, considering the growing number of measurements, it is a time-consuming, on-going process. We have tested some machine learning algorithms for lidar signal classification and had success with both supervised and unsupervised methods.