Articles | Volume 14, issue 7
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 4915–4928, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4915-2021
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 4915–4928, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4915-2021

Research article 13 Jul 2021

Research article | 13 Jul 2021

Total ozone column intercomparison of Brewers, Dobsons, and BTS-Solar at Hohenpeißenberg and Davos in 2019/2020

Ralf Zuber et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on amt-2021-52', Vladimir Savastiouk, 27 Apr 2021
  • RC2: 'Comment on amt-2021-52', Anonymous Referee #3, 10 May 2021

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Ralf Zuber on behalf of the Authors (28 May 2021)  Author's response    Author's tracked changes    Manuscript
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (04 Jun 2021) by Natalya Kramarova
AR by Ralf Zuber on behalf of the Authors (16 Jun 2021)  Author's response    Manuscript
Download
Short summary
We validated two BTS-based systems in a longer-term TOC analysis in the 2019/2020 campaign at Hohenpeißenberg and Davos. The results showed a deviation of the BTS-Solar to Brewers of < 0.1 % with a k = 2 of < 1.5 %. Koherent showed a deviation of 1.7 % with a k = 2 of 2.7 %. Resultingly, the BTS-Solar performance is comparable to Brewers in Hohenpeißenberg. Koherent shows a seasonal variation in Davos due to the sensitivity of its TOC retrieval algorithm to stratospheric temperature.