Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
AMT
Articles | Volume 14, issue 7
Articles | Volume 14, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4915-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4915-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 14, issue 7
Research article
 | 
13 Jul 2021
Research article |  | 13 Jul 2021

Total ozone column intercomparison of Brewers, Dobsons, and BTS-Solar at Hohenpeißenberg and Davos in 2019/2020

Ralf Zuber, Ulf Köhler, Luca Egli, Mario Ribnitzky, Wolfgang Steinbrecht, and Julian Gröbner

Viewed

Total article views: 2,313 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,509 748 56 2,313 53 43
  • HTML: 1,509
  • PDF: 748
  • XML: 56
  • Total: 2,313
  • BibTeX: 53
  • EndNote: 43
Views and downloads (calculated since 31 Mar 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 31 Mar 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,313 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,240 with geography defined and 73 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 29 Jun 2024
Download
Short summary
We validated two BTS-based systems in a longer-term TOC analysis in the 2019/2020 campaign at Hohenpeißenberg and Davos. The results showed a deviation of the BTS-Solar to Brewers of < 0.1 % with a k = 2 of < 1.5 %. Koherent showed a deviation of 1.7 % with a k = 2 of 2.7 %. Resultingly, the BTS-Solar performance is comparable to Brewers in Hohenpeißenberg. Koherent shows a seasonal variation in Davos due to the sensitivity of its TOC retrieval algorithm to stratospheric temperature.
Read more