Articles | Volume 14, issue 7
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 4915–4928, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4915-2021
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 4915–4928, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4915-2021

Research article 13 Jul 2021

Research article | 13 Jul 2021

Total ozone column intercomparison of Brewers, Dobsons, and BTS-Solar at Hohenpeißenberg and Davos in 2019/2020

Ralf Zuber et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 865 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
643 201 21 865 13 8
  • HTML: 643
  • PDF: 201
  • XML: 21
  • Total: 865
  • BibTeX: 13
  • EndNote: 8
Views and downloads (calculated since 31 Mar 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 31 Mar 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 824 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 824 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 21 Sep 2021
Download
Short summary
We validated two BTS-based systems in a longer-term TOC analysis in the 2019/2020 campaign at Hohenpeißenberg and Davos. The results showed a deviation of the BTS-Solar to Brewers of < 0.1 % with a k = 2 of < 1.5 %. Koherent showed a deviation of 1.7 % with a k = 2 of 2.7 %. Resultingly, the BTS-Solar performance is comparable to Brewers in Hohenpeißenberg. Koherent shows a seasonal variation in Davos due to the sensitivity of its TOC retrieval algorithm to stratospheric temperature.