Articles | Volume 15, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2479-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2479-2022
Research article
 | 
25 Apr 2022
Research article |  | 25 Apr 2022

Evaluating convective planetary boundary layer height estimations resolved by both active and passive remote sensing instruments during the CHEESEHEAD19 field campaign

James B. Duncan Jr., Laura Bianco, Bianca Adler, Tyler Bell, Irina V. Djalalova, Laura Riihimaki, Joseph Sedlar, Elizabeth N. Smith, David D. Turner, Timothy J. Wagner, and James M. Wilczak

Viewed

Total article views: 2,185 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,448 678 59 2,185 187 49 43
  • HTML: 1,448
  • PDF: 678
  • XML: 59
  • Total: 2,185
  • Supplement: 187
  • BibTeX: 49
  • EndNote: 43
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Dec 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 20 Dec 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,185 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,219 with geography defined and -34 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 13 Jun 2024
Download
Short summary
In this study, several ground-based remote sensing instruments are used to estimate the height of the convective planetary boundary layer, and their performance is compared against independent boundary layer depth estimates obtained from radiosondes launched as part of the CHEESEHEAD19 field campaign. The impact of clouds (particularly boundary layer clouds) on the estimation of the boundary layer depth is also investigated.